Citizenship (Armed Forces) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Citizenship (Armed Forces) Bill

John Bercow Excerpts
Friday 17th January 2014

(10 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jacob Rees-Mogg Portrait Jacob Rees-Mogg (North East Somerset) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Mr Speaker, I do not believe you ever weary of listening to speeches in this Chamber.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

The hon. Member for North East Somerset (Jacob Rees-Mogg) is entirely correct in his surmise.

--- Later in debate ---
Jonathan Lord Portrait Jonathan Lord
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In my constituency of Woking, we have a Muslim burial ground, which, I am pleased to say, will be renovated in time for the commemorations of the great war. It was built to house the remains and give proper dignity to, and proper commemoration of, the sacrifices made by those from the Indian sub-continent. Indian soldiers or those from modern-day Pakistan who served in the great war are commemorated there. We are talking about the new Commonwealth as well as the old Commonwealth and the European countries that served alongside our Great British forces in both of those great wars.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

As significant tribute has now been paid to the respective immigrant communities of the United Kingdom, and that is perfectly right, the hon. Member for Hexham (Guy Opperman), I am sure, will now wish to focus with a laser-like precision on the contents of the Bill as it stands at Third Reading.

Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Mr Speaker, I am delighted to say that you have prompted me to say that I am in the last minute or so of my speech. I could not finish, notwithstanding your strong instruction on matters of international domain, without pointing out that crucially this Bill will affect the 9,000 foreign and Commonwealth troops who are serving in our armed forces, 200 of whom are expected to fall foul of the five-year rule. It would be totally wrong of this House in the 21st century to allow a situation in which those 200 or 300 are disadvantaged and not treated as equals. They are no different from those troops who have so bravely served us in the past.