Stephanie Peacock Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Stephanie Peacock

Information between 12th March 2024 - 11th April 2024

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Mar 2024 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 147
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 292
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 293
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 179 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 181 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 249
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 179 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 250
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 181 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 251
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 181 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 250
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 251
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 181 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 255
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 252
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 182 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 255
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 154 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 305
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 151 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 305
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 152 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 306
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Stephanie Peacock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 301


Speeches
Stephanie Peacock speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephanie Peacock contributed 2 speeches (76 words)
Tuesday 26th March 2024 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Justice
Stephanie Peacock speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Stephanie Peacock contributed 2 speeches (56 words)
Monday 25th March 2024 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence
Stephanie Peacock speeches from: Sport: Gambling Advertising
Stephanie Peacock contributed 2 speeches (1,144 words)
Wednesday 13th March 2024 - Westminster Hall
Department for Business and Trade


Written Answers
Football: Governing Bodies
Asked by: Stephanie Peacock (Labour - Barnsley East)
Friday 15th March 2024

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, when she plans to publish the Football Governance Bill.

Answered by Stuart Andrew - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

This Government is committed to introducing a new independent regulator for English football, to protect and promote the sustainability of English football for the benefit of fans and the local communities football clubs serve.

The Government is working at pace to establish an Independent Football Regulator on a statutory footing as soon as parliamentary time allows.

Shingles: Vaccination
Asked by: Stephanie Peacock (Labour - Barnsley East)
Monday 18th March 2024

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether she plans to introduce the shingles vaccine for adults aged over 65.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

The current policy is to offer the shingles vaccine to anyone who turned 65 and 70 years old after 1 September 2023, as well as to anyone aged 50 years and older who is at higher risk of serious complications. This policy has significantly improved the already very successful programme.

People aged 66 to 69 years old on 1 September 2023, who do not have a severely weakened immune system, will become eligible for shingles vaccination when they turn 70 years old. Those with a severely weakened immune system are eligible for the shingrix vaccine from 50 years old, due to their increased risk. Anyone who is unsure if they are at higher risk of complications from shingles should speak to their general practitioner. It is important that anyone eligible takes up this offer to protect themselves.

The Government’s policy on groups eligible for the shingles vaccination programme is based on recommendations by the independent expert body, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and the scope and speed of any expansion of a programme is decided between the UK Health Security Agency, the Department, and NHS England.

Shingles: Vaccination
Asked by: Stephanie Peacock (Labour - Barnsley East)
Monday 18th March 2024

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of introducing the shingles vaccine to adults aged 65 and over.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

The Shingrix programme was recommended by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), to provide better and longer lasting population-level protection from a younger age than the previous Zostavax programme. The Shingrix shingles vaccination programme was introduced from September 2023, to offer two doses of the vaccine to immunocompetent individuals turning 65 and 70 years old, and severely immunosuppressed adults over 50 years old.

A cost-effectiveness review by the JCVI concluded that although the highest monetary benefit would be to provide the Shingrix vaccination at 65 years old, by offering it at 60 years old the highest number of cases would be prevented. For immunosuppressed individuals, Shingrix was determined to be cost-effective between the ages of 50 to 90 years old.

To avoid undue additional pressure on National Health Service delivery services, the Shingrix vaccine will be delivered in a phased approach over 10 years, after which the vaccine would then be offered routinely from 60 years old.

Shingles
Asked by: Stephanie Peacock (Labour - Barnsley East)
Tuesday 19th March 2024

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many shingles cases have led to complications requiring treatment in the last five years.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

The United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA) does not collect data on shingles cases that have led to complications requiring treatment. NHS England has provided the number of hospital admissions, with and without complications, from 2018/19 to 2022/23:

2018/19

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022/23

Total with Complications

1,521

1,552

1,259

1,486

1,401

Total without Complications

2,008

2,024

1,623

1,806

1,730

Grand Total

3,529

3,576

2,882

3,292

3,131

Source: Hospital Episode Statistics, NHS England

This should not be described as counts of people, however, as the same person may have more than one admission within any given time period. In addition, the UKHSA has published a paper showing the impact of the zostavax vaccine on the number of hospital admissions, which is available at the following link:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32641364/




Stephanie Peacock mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Sport: Gambling Advertising
26 speeches (10,845 words)
Wednesday 13th March 2024 - Westminster Hall
Department for Business and Trade
Mentions:
1: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) Member for Barnsley East (Stephanie Peacock) mentioned, and further cut the average number of sports - Link to Speech