To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office: British Indian Ocean Territory
Wednesday 26th February 2025

Asked by: Steve Barclay (Conservative - North East Cambridgeshire)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, how many officials in his Department are working on issues related to the Chagos Islands.

Answered by Stephen Doughty - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

It would be difficult to assess how many officials are working on these issues, given that we do not record and measure the amount of time spent on any one topic where an official covers a range of matters.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 27 Nov 2017
Budget Resolutions

"I thank my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary for opening the debate. He spoke with customary élan about how the Budget will ensure that Britain capitalises on the industries of the future—robotics, artificial intelligence and self-driving cars. He was right to highlight that a new tech business is created …..."
Steve Barclay - View Speech

View all Steve Barclay (Con - North East Cambridgeshire) contributions to the debate on: Budget Resolutions

Written Question
Russia
Tuesday 9th December 2014

Asked by: Steve Barclay (Conservative - North East Cambridgeshire)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what information his Department has supplied to the British embassy in Moscow to enable people involved in the (a) arrest, torture and death of Sergei Magnitsky and (b) fraud he uncovered to be identified when visa applications are assessed.

Answered by David Lidington

The Home Office works closely with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and other government departments to identify individuals whose presence in the UK would not be conducive to the public good, including on the basis of human rights abuses. Details of individuals who are banned from entering the UK are included on the UK watch list which means that Entry Clearance Officers and Border Force officials are able to refuse visas or deny entry. It is Government policy not to discuss specific information held on watch lists as to do so would not be in the interests of border and national security.

The FCO cooperates with the Home Office on the availability of independent, reliable and credible evidence that an individual has committed human rights abuses. Where our Posts abroad have identified individuals that should be refused entry to the UK on the basis of human rights abuses they will refer such cases to the Home Office for consideration.


Written Question
Sanctions
Monday 27th October 2014

Asked by: Steve Barclay (Conservative - North East Cambridgeshire)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will make a comparative assessment of the criteria used to draw up the (a) UK, (b) US and (c) UN sanctions lists.

Answered by Lord Swire

There are over 30 sanctions regimes at either EU or UN level. Sanctions regimes are designed to combat a range of issues including: proliferation, terrorism and human rights issues. Criteria for each regime are therefore very different and crafted to meet the specific ends of the sanctions regime. The EU implements all UN sanctions and in doing so will reflect the criteria agreed at UN level. However, where the EU implements its own sanctions regime or goes further than UN sanctions (e.g. on Iran or Syria), the criteria are set by the EU. US sanctions criteria for their own domestic measures vary from regime to regime and may be different from the UN or EU criteria. UK sanctions lists replicate UN / EU lists except in relation to counter-terrorism sanctions where, in addition to implementing UN / EU sanctions, the Treasury can freeze domestically the assets of those believed to have been involved in terrorist related activity, where this is necessary for public protection from terrorism, under the Terrorist Asset-Freezing Act 2010.


Written Question
Sanctions
Thursday 23rd October 2014

Asked by: Steve Barclay (Conservative - North East Cambridgeshire)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, for what reasons the UK has not applied sanctions to all individuals on the US and UN sanction lists.

Answered by Lord Swire

The UK implements all sanctions agreed at the UN. These sanctions are implemented via the EU. The UK is responsible for implementation for the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. The US has its own domestic legislation by which it can introduce sanctions. This is an entirely separate process to the UN. The UK would not implement US domestic sanctions, although there may be individuals that the US designates which are also listed under UN sanctions.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 10 Sep 2014
Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

"The point that my hon. Friend the Member for Penrith and The Border (Rory Stewart) is making, and with which many of us agree, is that the Government and the Opposition seem to have an unachievable aim. It is slightly ironic that we are offering devo-max after 300 years of …..."
Steve Barclay - View Speech

View all Steve Barclay (Con - North East Cambridgeshire) contributions to the debate on: Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 10 Sep 2014
Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

"Is the right hon. and learned Gentleman suggesting that we should perhaps take money from DFID’s budget, which is often justified in terms of soft power? Last year, for example, it spent £4 million on a Spice Girl-style band in Ethiopia. Should we not be spending that sort of funding …..."
Steve Barclay - View Speech

View all Steve Barclay (Con - North East Cambridgeshire) contributions to the debate on: Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 10 Sep 2014
Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

"Does my hon. Friend agree that such leverage could be used in some of the existing disputes between the Baghdad Government and the Kurds?..."
Steve Barclay - View Speech

View all Steve Barclay (Con - North East Cambridgeshire) contributions to the debate on: Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 10 Sep 2014
Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

"In his remarks to the House on Monday, the Prime Minister spoke of the opportunity offered by the new Government in Baghdad. There is a certain tension between that remark and those of the Foreign Secretary when he spoke of taking stronger action on the financing of Islamic State. IS …..."
Steve Barclay - View Speech

View all Steve Barclay (Con - North East Cambridgeshire) contributions to the debate on: Ukraine, Middle East, North Africa and Security

Written Question
Zimbabwe
Tuesday 8th July 2014

Asked by: Steve Barclay (Conservative - North East Cambridgeshire)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, with reference to the Answer of 29 October 2013, Official Report, column 411W, on Zimbabwe: pension payments, what steps his Department has taken to ensure that British nationals in Zimbabwe receive their pensions.

Answered by Mark Simmonds

We continue to pursue a resolution to this issue. I have personally written to both Finance Minister Chinamasa and the responsible Minister for Pensions, Minister Goche. I also raised the issue during a meeting with the Zimbabwean Ambassador in London on 30 June. We are in regular contact with the Director of Pensions, with whom officials last met on 12 June. Our Ambassador regularly raises the issue with interlocutors, including most recently on 4 June with the Finance Minister Chinamasa. She also wrote to the Zimbabwe Civil Service Commission in December 2013; we await a response. We remain in regular contact with the interested parties, including the Overseas Service Pensioners Association (OSPA) and the Federal Pensioners Association in Harare.