Employment Rights Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateSureena Brackenridge
Main Page: Sureena Brackenridge (Labour - Wolverhampton North East)Department Debates - View all Sureena Brackenridge's debates with the Department for Business and Trade
(2 days, 16 hours ago)
Commons ChamberI understand that there will be workers around the country who are worried about the watering down of such legislation. I reassure my hon. Friend that as long as they vote Labour, that will never happen.
In the other place, the Government made amendments to strengthen protections for social care workers and school support staff, ensuring that workers whose employers go above and beyond the minimum standards set out by the negotiating bodies will have those better terms protected.
On that point, will the Secretary of State give way?
As a former schoolteacher and leader, I know the value of support staff and how critical they are, but does the Secretary of State agree that Lords amendment 121 is unnecessary? The Bill already ensures that no negotiating body can prevent employers from offering better terms and conditions where they wish to do so. The school support staff negotiating body was regrettably abolished in 2010, but this Government will reinstate it. The amendment would add needless bureaucracy and would risk impeding the flexibility that schools and staff rightly expect.