Information between 18th April 2026 - 28th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 61 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Tim Roca voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Carbon Capture and Storage: Cheshire East
Asked by: Tim Roca (Labour - Macclesfield) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether the Health and Safety Executive has been consulted by Peak Cluster Limited on the proximity of the proposed CO2 pipeline route and above-ground installation to Gawsworth Church of England Primary School. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) As a statutory consultee to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) process for the Peak Cluster pipeline, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has responded to the Planning Inspectorate at the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Stage confirming whether the proposed pipeline passes through the Consultation Distances of other major accident hazard pipelines, major hazard sites, or licensed explosives sites.
Under the Pipeline Safety Regulations 1996, as amended, the operator of a major hazard pipeline is required to produce a major accident prevention document prior to the design of the pipeline being completed, demonstrating that major accident hazard potential arising from the pipeline has been identified; evaluation of those risks has been carried out; and that an adequate safety management system for those risks is in place. |
|
Carbon Capture and Storage: Cheshire East
Asked by: Tim Roca (Labour - Macclesfield) Friday 24th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the National Wealth Fund (a) conducted due diligence on alternative pipeline route and junction location options and (b) commissioned an independent engineering assessment of alternative junction locations for the meeting point of pipeline Sections 3 and 4 before investing in Peak Cluster Limited. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The National Wealth Fund (NWF) is operationally independent in regard to its investment decisions. The NWF undertakes extensive due diligence in line with commercial investor assessment standards, processes and quantification methodologies, to ensure that taxpayer funds are deployed safely, represent value for money, and support technically and commercially viable projects.
|
|
Carbon Capture and Storage: Cheshire East
Asked by: Tim Roca (Labour - Macclesfield) Friday 24th April 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether Peak Cluster Limited has submitted to his Department or to Ofgem any societal risk assessment (FN curve analysis) under BS PD 8010 Parts 1 and 3 comparing the risk profile of the current proposed pipeline route through Gawsworth Parish with any alternative route that avoids the settled Gawsworth valley. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The department is engaging with potential future CCUS projects, including the Peak Cluster, to understand their proposals.
The Peak Cluster’s pipeline proposals are still in development. A societal risk assessment is part of the quantitative risk assessment framework for the pipelines under BS PD8010, which will be carried out as part of the FEED design stage. The Peak Cluster project is not yet at this stage. Once complete, the risk assessment will be submitted to the Health and Safety Executive, who will undertake the review. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 13th April Tim Roca signed this EDM on Monday 20th April 2026 100th anniversary of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 101 signatures (Most recent: 21 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme) That this House notes, with affection and respect, the 100th anniversary, on 21 April 2026 of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; reflects on the sense of loss that people throughout the United Kingdom, the realms, territories and Commonwealth still feel following Her late Majesty’s death on … |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 24th April 2026
Report - 7th Report – Resetting the relationship with fishing communities Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Found: Falmouth) Josh Newbury (Labour; Cannock Chase) Jenny Riddell-Carpenter (Labour; Suffolk Coastal) Tim Roca |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 9:30 a.m. Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Department and its arm’s-length bodies At 10:15am: Oral evidence Dame Helen Ghosh, Preferred candidate to become Chair of OEP View calendar - Add to calendar |