To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 25 Apr 2022
Ukraine Update

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: Ukraine Update

Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 10 Jan 2022
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 14 Oct 2020
RAF Valley: Funding and Employment

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: RAF Valley: Funding and Employment

Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 14 Oct 2020
RAF Valley: Funding and Employment

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: RAF Valley: Funding and Employment

Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 14 Oct 2020
RAF Valley: Funding and Employment

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: RAF Valley: Funding and Employment

Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 16 Mar 2020
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Armed Forces: Training
Monday 3rd February 2020

Asked by: Wayne David (Labour - Caerphilly)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of Service law in holding people accountable for military training supervision.

Answered by Johnny Mercer - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Minister for Veterans' Affairs)

I refer the hon. Member to the Government response to the Defence Committee's specific recommendations and conclusions

(https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmdfence/525/52504.htm#_idTextAnchor001), and specifically to answers 21 to 28 in the section titled "Accountability".

The exemptions to the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 relating to operations, "hazardous training in preparation for operations", and Specialist Military Units were addressed in answer 25 of the Government response. The rationale set out then remains valid but as the answer notes, the situation is kept under review.

The Ministry of Defence believes that the range of criminal, disciplinary and administrative powers available provides a sufficient means of holding individuals, the Armed Forces, and the Department accountable for training supervision, but this too remains under review and any necessary changes will be addressed in the next Armed Forces Bill.


Written Question
Armed Forces: Training
Monday 3rd February 2020

Asked by: Wayne David (Labour - Caerphilly)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the Defence Select Committee report, Session 2015-16, Beyond Endurance: Military Exercises and the Duty of Care (HC598), what recent assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of the recommendation that the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 should be amended to provide appropriate legal restraints to the military.

Answered by Johnny Mercer - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Minister for Veterans' Affairs)

I refer the hon. Member to the Government response to the Defence Committee's specific recommendations and conclusions

(https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmdfence/525/52504.htm#_idTextAnchor001), and specifically to answers 21 to 28 in the section titled "Accountability".

The exemptions to the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 relating to operations, "hazardous training in preparation for operations", and Specialist Military Units were addressed in answer 25 of the Government response. The rationale set out then remains valid but as the answer notes, the situation is kept under review.

The Ministry of Defence believes that the range of criminal, disciplinary and administrative powers available provides a sufficient means of holding individuals, the Armed Forces, and the Department accountable for training supervision, but this too remains under review and any necessary changes will be addressed in the next Armed Forces Bill.


Written Question
Armed Forces: Training
Monday 3rd February 2020

Asked by: Wayne David (Labour - Caerphilly)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of sanctions applied to (a) his Department, (b) the armed forces and (c) individuals for failings in the safe supervision of training events.

Answered by Johnny Mercer - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Minister for Veterans' Affairs)

I refer the hon. Member to the Government response to the Defence Committee's specific recommendations and conclusions

(https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmdfence/525/52504.htm#_idTextAnchor001), and specifically to answers 21 to 28 in the section titled "Accountability".

The exemptions to the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 relating to operations, "hazardous training in preparation for operations", and Specialist Military Units were addressed in answer 25 of the Government response. The rationale set out then remains valid but as the answer notes, the situation is kept under review.

The Ministry of Defence believes that the range of criminal, disciplinary and administrative powers available provides a sufficient means of holding individuals, the Armed Forces, and the Department accountable for training supervision, but this too remains under review and any necessary changes will be addressed in the next Armed Forces Bill.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 03 Feb 2020
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Wayne David (Lab - Caerphilly) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions