Prisons: Contracts
(asked on 8th March 2018) - View Source
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the (a) names of providers and (b) value of each of the bids was of tenders submitted for (a) lot 1, (b) lot 2, (c) lot 3 and (d) lot 4 for the prison facilities management contracts awarded in 2014.
The names of providers who submitted tenders are as follows:
| Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 | Lot 4 |
Regions | North East, North West, Yorkshire and Humberside | East Midlands, West Midlands, Wales | East of England, London | South West, South Central, Kent and Sussex |
Successful bidder | Amey | Amey | Carillion | Carillion |
Unsuccessful bidders | Mitie, Sodexo, Carillion | Mitie, Sodexo, Carillion | Mitie, Sodexo, Amey | Mitie, Sodexo, Amey |
All Tender prices were entered into a permutation table which calculated the most economically advantageous submission for each Package Order or combination of Package Orders. The most economically advantageous permutation of tenders are as follows:
Package Order E: £117,861,047 (Amey)
Package Order F: £ 93,429,773 (Amey)
Package Order G: £ 98,790,002 (Carillion)
Package Order H: £ 100,195,572 (Carillion)
The Department does not publish the value of unsuccessful bidders due to commercial sensitivity.