Restraining Orders

(asked on 5th March 2015) - View Source

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many restraining orders issued by the courts were breached (a) once, (b) twice and (c) on more than three occasions in each of the last five years.


Answered by
 Portrait
Simon Hughes
This question was answered on 12th March 2015

I am replying as the Ministry of Justice has overall responsibility for this legislation. The Government is absolutely clear that stalking and harassment, which cause misery for victims, are totally unacceptable. That is why in 2012 we added to the existing offences in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (harassment (section 2) and putting people in fear of violence (section 4)) two new specific offences of stalking (section 2A) and stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress (section 4A).

The 1997 Act also gives the courts the option, upon conviction or acquittal for an offence under it, of making a restraining order for the purpose of protecting the victim of an offence, or any other person mentioned in the order, from conduct that amounts to harassment or that will cause fear of violence. Breach of such an order is a criminal offence carrying a maximum sentence of five years in prison, or a fine, or both.

The number of offenders convicted on one, two, or three or more occasions, in each of the last five years for which data is available, of breaching a restraining order can be viewed in the table below. These figures have been drawn from an extract of the Police National Computer (PNC) data held by the Department. The PNC holds details of all convictions and cautions given for recordable offences. As with any large scale recording system the PNC is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing so data provided may be subject to revision.

Number of offenders breaching restraining orders1, England and Wales2

Number of restraining order breach offences3

12 months ending September4

1

2

3 or more

2010

1,655

211

71

2011

2,738

456

138

2012

3,638

607

216

2013

4,086

710

221

2014

4,822

767

244

Data Source: MoJs copy of the Police National Computer

1. Includes offences covered by:

- Breach of a restraining order under s5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997

- Breach of restraining Order under s5A of the Sex Offenders Act 1997 (Sexual Offences Prevention Orders replaced restraining orders under s.5A Sex Offenders Act 1997. However, it is possible for cases to still appear where an offender is subject to one of the orders that pre-date the Sexual Offences Act 2003)

- Breach of a restraining order on acquittal under s.5A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997

2. England and Wales includes all 43 police force areas and the British Transport Police

3. Where the primary offence on a given occasion was a restraining order breach offence.

4. The same offender may appear in multiple years.

The number of restraining orders issued and sentences given for breaches of restraining orders, from 2009 to 2013 (the latest available) in England and Wales, can be viewed in the table below. These figures are taken from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) court proceedings database.

Number of restraining orders issued and sentences given for breaches of restraining orders, England & Wales, 2009 to 2013(1)(2)

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Offenders issued with a restraining order(3)(4)(5)

5,074

10,761

19,551

20,067

20,304

Offenders convicted for breaching a restraining order

Convicted

1,464

2,920

4,558

5,699

6,337

Sentenced

1,329

2,798

4,431

5,608

6,194

Immediate custody

457

904

1,594

2,101

2,236

Suspended sentence

178

381

507

667

822

Community sentence

371

779

1,299

1,461

1,563

Fine

141

321

469

705

847

Absolute discharge

5

15

19

28

40

Conditional discharge

93

237

385

462

469

Otherwise dealt with

84

161

158

184

217

(1) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

(3) Includes restraining orders issued on conviction or acquittal.

(4) Issued under either S.5 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 or S.5A Sex Offenders Act 1997.

(5) Sexual Offences Prevention Orders replaced restraining orders under s.5A Sex Offenders Act 1997 and Sex Offender Orders under s.2 Crime and Disorder Act 1998. However, it is possible for cases to still appear where an offender is subject to one of the orders that pre-date the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice.

PQ: 226457

Court proceedings data for 2014 are planned for publication in May 2015.

Figures taken from the PNC database will differ from figures taken from the MoJ court proceedings database. Hence, police recorded crime and court proceedings data are not directly comparable.

As the Violence Against Women and Girls Report (Home Office, 2015) notes: “Increases in reporting of domestic abuse incidents indicate that victims have more confidence in the criminal justice system. Prosecutions for domestic abuse have increased while out of court disposals for domestic abuse at the pre-charge stage have reached their lowest levels, and we have seen increases in the volume of prosecutions and conviction rate for all VAWG offences. These figures are showing that not only are victims more confident in coming forward – the criminal justice system is delivering improved outcomes for them.”

Reticulating Splines