Mentions:
1: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (LAB - Life peer) This means they do not even have to be disclosed to Parliament, let alone laid and debated here. - Speech Link
2: Baroness Donaghy (LAB - Life peer) It was thanks to Mr Johnson advising the Queen to prorogue Parliament in 2019 that there was extra time - Speech Link
3: Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (CB - Life peer) that if CRaG does not apply, then they do not need to do anything. - Speech Link
4: Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (LAB - Life peer) national importance which do not require the say not just of government but of Parliament. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Sarah Jones (LAB - Croydon Central) I do not mind how noisy the Minister is; I do not want to curtail his right to be as noisy as he likes.We - Speech Link
2: Sarah Jones (LAB - Croydon Central) ensure that protests are reasonable, and do not put out the public too much. - Speech Link
3: Margaret Greenwood (LAB - Wirral West) When people go to a demonstration, they do not know who else will be there. - Speech Link
4: None We do not need these new provisions, and the Government know it. - Speech Link
5: Sarah Jones (LAB - Croydon Central) However, the Bill does not do anything on that; it is about protests. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Kemi Badenoch (CON - Saffron Walden) The answer is no, we do not share that concern. - Speech Link
2: Chris Clarkson (CON - Heywood and Middleton) So do not spin the line that this does not happen. - Speech Link
3: Beth Winter (LAB - Cynon Valley) In the week in which the Government intend to prorogue the House, they have voted to carry over three - Speech Link
4: John McDonnell (LAB - Hayes and Harlington) The Government did not even do that, however. - Speech Link
Oral Evidence Apr. 28 2022
Inquiry: The UK’s new relationship with the EUFound: with the sovereignty of Parliament?
Mentions:
1: Anne McLaughlin (SNP - Glasgow North East) We can stand in the middle of Glasgow or outside the Scottish Parliament all we like—and we do—but the - Speech Link
2: Diane Abbott (LAB - Hackney North and Stoke Newington) It is Government Ministers who were responsible for attempting to prorogue Parliament in breach of the - Speech Link
3: Sarah Jones (LAB - Croydon Central) Why not do something about that? - Speech Link
Found: State Opening of Parliament - history and ceremonial
Oral Evidence Apr. 08 2022
Committee: Constitution CommitteeFound: the Government could prorogue Parliament whenever they liked for as long as they liked.
Oral Evidence Apr. 26 2022
Inquiry: Post-pandemic economic growth: State Aid and Post Brexit Competition PolicyFound: That is how we will judge it and how Parliament will be able to scrutinise its work as well.
Mentions:
1: Kevin Brennan (LAB - Cardiff West) in the way that they abused the power to prorogue Parliament during that period through a disgraceful - Speech Link
2: Julian Lewis (CON - New Forest East) I do not think it was a dreadful election—it was a brilliant election. - Speech Link
3: None be general elections, because I do not think that they were good chaps. - Speech Link
4: Patrick Grady (IND - Glasgow North) This is not control being taken back by Parliament but control being taken from Parliament by the Executive - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Viscount Hailsham (CON - Life peer) have known him for over 60 years—rightly pointed out, the present Prime Minister illegally thought to prorogue - Speech Link
2: None , as it is reasonable for Parliament to do, to have regard to when going about its work, particularly - Speech Link
3: Lord Rennard (LDEM - Life peer) However, I do not believe that this is happening. - Speech Link
4: Lord Collins of Highbury (LAB - Life peer) prefer that the Government did not do it. - Speech Link