Make provision about the effect, during an appeal, of an order under section 40 of the British Nationality Act 1981.
The Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Act 2025 was a Government Bill that became an Act of Parliament.
Is this Bill currently before Parliament?No. This Bill was introduced on 19 June 2025 and became an Act of Parliament on 27 October 2025.
Whose idea is this Bill?Government Bills implement the legislative agenda of the Government. This agenda, and the Bills that will implement it, are outlined in the Queen's Speech at the Session's State Opening of Parliament.
How can I find out exactly what this Bill does?The most straightforward information is contained in the initial Explanatory Notes for the Bill.
Would you like to know more?See these Glossary articles for more information: Act of Parliament, Government Bills, Process of a Bill
Official Bill Page Initial Explanatory Notes Initial Briefing papers Ministerial Extracts from Debates All Bill Debates
This bill has received Royal Assent and has become an Act of Parliament
Bill Progession through Parliament
1
Lord Verdirame (Non-affiliated)Clause 1, page 1, line 25, at end insert— “(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the citizenship, during the appeal period, of a child of a person who makes an appeal under inserted section (2B).
NC1
Lisa Smart (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Cabinet Office)To move the following Clause— "Independent review (1) The Secretary of State must, within one year of the passing of this Act, commission an independent review of the effects of the changes made to section 40A of the British Nationality Act 1981 by section 1. (2) The review must be completed within two years of the passing of this Act. (3) As soon as practicable after a person has carried out the review, the person must— (a) produce a report of the outcome of the review, and (b) send a copy of the report to the Secretary of State. (4) The Secretary of State must lay before each House of Parliament a copy of the report sent under subsection (3)(b) within one month of receiving the report."
1
Kit Malthouse (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 9, at end insert— "(2BA) But a judge may determine that an order does not continue to have effect for a person "P" during the appeal period if, on granting leave to appeal at any stage, they are satisfied that— (a) "P" faces a real and substantial threat of serious harm as a result of the order, (b) continuation of the order would significantly prejudice their ability to mount an effective defence at a subsequent appeal, or (c) the duration of the appeal process has been excessive because of an act or omission by a public authority."