Mentions:
1: Leo Docherty (Con - Aldershot) We have no role in that, and we see no evidence of the prospect of that being used. - Speech Link
2: Leo Docherty (Con - Aldershot) We do that because it is the honourable thing to do. - Speech Link
3: Julian Lewis (Con - New Forest East) houses, we have no hospitals, we have no schools. - Speech Link
4: Miriam Cates (Con - Penistone and Stocksbridge) Friend agree that such a move would both harm UK defence interests and disadvantage our own armed forces - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Rishi Sunak (Con - Richmond (Yorks)) First, I want to apologise for the failure in blood policy and blood products, and the devastating—and - Speech Link
2: Keir Starmer (Lab - Holborn and St Pancras) no mistake—the victims in this scandal have suffered unspeakably. - Speech Link
3: Stephen Flynn (SNP - Aberdeen South) The first is an apology. I am incredibly sorry that this happened to you. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Marsha De Cordova (Lab - Battersea) That’s fine—no need to apologise! - Speech Link
2: Theresa Villiers (Con - Chipping Barnet) They harm our economy and our capital city, and they punish people just for trying to get around in a - Speech Link
3: Ruth Cadbury (Lab - Brentford and Isleworth) They use physical barriers such as bollards and planters, and no one—no one—has contacted me or their - Speech Link
4: Guy Opperman (Con - Hexham) But they can also do harm where they are poorly thought through and introduced with insufficient public - Speech Link
5: Guy Opperman (Con - Hexham) The first petition asks that the Government carry out an independent review of LTNs. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley East) What harm are you guarding against? How do you craft that? - Speech Link
2: Shaun Bailey (Con - West Bromwich West) First, how do we ensure that we are not, with this Bill, effectively turning football into something - Speech Link
3: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley East) My first question is: do you believe that the Bill carves out enough space for existing supporters’ trusts - Speech Link
4: Anna Firth (Con - Southend West) Alistair Jones: Personally, no. I do not think it goes far enough. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) The potential harm that that can cause to fans and the local communities reliant on the clubs is unacceptable - Speech Link
2: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley East) proportionality requirement will ensure that where clubs are running sustainably, with low risk of harm - Speech Link
3: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) defined scope and purpose, to tackle the specific market failures that carry a risk of significant harm - Speech Link
4: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) That reflects the fact that the regulator’s scope has been carefully targeted at addressing harm where - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Peter Dowd (Lab - Bootle) than 1,000 people who responded, 67% had experienced symptoms of depression, 27% had considered self-harm - Speech Link
2: Khalid Mahmood (Lab - Birmingham, Perry Barr) 67% of patients with kidney disease had experienced symptoms of depression, 27% had considered self-harm - Speech Link
3: Abena Oppong-Asare (Lab - Erith and Thamesmead) Labour has committed to include reform of the Act in our first King’s Speech. - Speech Link
4: Maria Caulfield (Con - Lewes) No referral is required. - Speech Link
5: Peter Dowd (Lab - Bootle) First, thank you for your excellent stewardship of today’s event, Sir Robert. I thank my hon. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Browning (Con - Life peer) What the person who looked at it in the first place was thinking about, I really do not know.The questions - Speech Link
2: Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (LD - Life peer) They also intend to severely restrict the serious harm test. - Speech Link
3: Lord Addington (LD - Excepted Hereditary) Making sure you do not get noise on the microphone is probably the first step, and then you have done - Speech Link
4: Baroness Andrews (Lab - Life peer) Gloriously Normal Life, we showed how interdependent carers were with the people they cared for—if you harm - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Patricia Gibson (SNP - North Ayrshire and Arran) Empty words do not pay bills, and no one is fooled by that nonsense.Perhaps we should not be too surprised - Speech Link
2: Marco Longhi (Con - Dudley North) identified the women who have come to harm. - Speech Link
3: Wendy Chamberlain (LD - North East Fife) The first report on maladministration was published almost three years ago, so I just do not accept that - Speech Link
4: Alison McGovern (Lab - Wirral South) My first question is about time. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Gillian Keegan (Con - Chichester) about the importance of boundaries and privacy and that they have rights over their own bodies, but no - Speech Link
2: Catherine McKinnell (Lab - Newcastle upon Tyne North) additional content on suicide prevention in the secondary curriculum, as well as on the risks of self-harm - Speech Link
3: Gillian Keegan (Con - Chichester) Usually, parents are the first educators of their children. - Speech Link
4: George Howarth (Lab - Knowsley) In my time, there was no way in which children could discuss these issues with their parents, who did - Speech Link
5: Gillian Keegan (Con - Chichester) Friend’s welcoming of this guidance—materials will now have to be shown to parents, no ifs, no buts, - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Barran (Con - Life peer) about the importance of boundaries and privacy and that they have rights over their own bodies, but no - Speech Link
2: Baroness Twycross (Lab - Life peer) schools in an age-appropriate way does not keep children as children but potentially exposes them to harm - Speech Link
3: Earl Russell (LD - Excepted Hereditary) If it is not broken, do not fix it: we on these Benches do not welcome most of these changes, which are - Speech Link
4: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab - Life peer) Can the Minister assure us that that sort of teaching material will no longer be in any school in any - Speech Link