Information between 18th March 2026 - 28th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 Cabinet Office Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Orders and regulations - Main Chamber Subject: Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975 (Amendment) Order 2026 Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975 (Amendment) Order 2026 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 108 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 110 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 166 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 185 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 116 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 58 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 81 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 64 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 81 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 83 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 110 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 107 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 112 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 140 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Northern Ireland After Brexit (Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee Report)
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 9 speeches (3,548 words) Wednesday 25th March 2026 - Grand Committee Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Arms Length Bodies
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 2 February (HL13762), what progress they have made in the arm's length bodies review; when they expect that review to be completed; and when they will publish its findings. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the Noble Lady to my answer to HL13762.: Question:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 19 January (HL13276), when the arm's length bodies (ALB) review will be completed; and whether its findings will be published.
Answer:
The review is ongoing. Outcomes will be communicated in due course.
|
|
Labour Together
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the reply by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 February (HL Deb col489), what is their current policy on (1) ministerial, (2) special adviser, and (3) civil service, engagement with Labour Together. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Ministerial Code sets out the standards of conduct expected of Ministers and how they discharge their duties, including meeting with any external organisations.
Any external engagement by special advisers must adhere to the Code of Conduct for Special Advisers. Similarly, any external engagement undertaken by civil servants must adhere to the Civil Service Code.
Guidance on the declaration and publication of external engagement undertaken by ministers, senior officials and special advisers is available on gov.uk at the following links:
|
|
Jonathan Powell
Asked by: Lord Gilbert of Panteg (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 5 February (HL13975), and in light of the statutory prohibitions under section 8(5)(b) of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 on exercising any power in relation to the management of any part of the civil service, why Jonathan Powell is listed as management on the Cabinet Office website. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Security Adviser sets direction on behalf of the Prime Minister for national security and foreign policy in the National Security Secretariat. Some leadership and corporate responsibilities, such as the line management of civil servants, accounting or matters affecting a civil servant’s career (including recruitment, promotion, reward and discipline), are not carried out by the National Security Adviser.
|
|
Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 March (HL14751), what resources, guidance or similar they provide to departments to support their legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation should be brought into force; and what reporting mechanisms they use to ensure that that duty is being met. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Each Government department is responsible for ensuring that this duty is met, including monitoring, reporting and guidance.
|
|
Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 March (HL14751), and the remarks by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 5 March (HL Deb col 585GC), what steps they are taking to ensure that departments are resourced to meet their legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation should be brought into force. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Each Government department is responsible for ensuring adequate resourcing to keep uncommenced legislation under review. |
|
Lobbying
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 18 December 2025 (HL12683) and 22 January 2026 (HL13471), what is the public interest reason for not disclosing (1) the dates of group phone calls with lobbyists, and (2) the names of the lobbying firms being briefed by the Government, in line with the guidance in the paragraphs 211 and 223 of the Guide to Parliamentary Work, updated 19 November 2024. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the Noble Lord back to HL12683:
Question: To ask His Majesty's Government on what dates calls have been held between the government and corporate lobbyists since 4 July 2024; which lobbying firms joined those calls; and which ministers have joined those calls.
Answer: Details of Ministers and Senior Officials' meetings, including those held using video or audio-conferencing technology, and including phone calls where these replace or take the format of an official meeting, are published by departments on GOV.UK every quarter.
GOV.UK transparency publications list details of Ministers' and Senior Officials' official meetings with all external organisations, including organised group telephone or video calls, where these replace or take the format of an official meeting.
These publications include the dates of meetings or calls, and the name(s) of the organisation(s) with whom the minister or senior official met.
|
|
Government Departments: Communication
Asked by: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 18 February (HL14450), what was the cost to existing operational budgets of (1) the rebranding of government communications from 'HM Government' to 'UK Government', and (2) any work to explore the redesigning of the Lesser Arms used in government communications. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Any costs associated with routine updates to branding guidance are covered by existing staff costs. The redesign of the Lesser Arms to accommodate the Tudor Crown cost £4,950.
|
|
Government Departments: Recruitment
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 February (HL14386), how they will monitor whether individual departments and agencies change their hiring procedures and practices to place greater value on frontline delivery, innovation and private sector experience. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Departments and agencies have delegated authority to determine their own practices and procedures for the recruitment of staff to the Civil Service, including the Senior Civil Service (SCS), as outlined in the Civil Service Management Code.
The Government People Group are collaborating with dedicated SCS Recruitment leads from the core Government departments to support them in sharing best practice and making relevant changes to their hiring practices, in line with the ambition set out in the Chief Secretary to the Prime Ministers’ speech of 20 January 2026.
|
|
Government Departments: Communication
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 26 February (HL14633), whether they will publish the (1) relevant stakeholders they consulted, and (2) standard protocols they used, to produce the updated government branding guidance. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The guidance was developed and agreed upon by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Number 10.
There are no plans to discontinue the use of "His Majesty's Government". This term continues to be used on relevant official communications and records, and this will not change.
|