Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent

Information between 14th April 2026 - 24th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer)

Statement - Main Chamber
Subject: Update on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180


Speeches
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 4 speeches (2,242 words)
Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Lords Chamber
Cabinet Office
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975 (Amendment) Order 2026
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 3 speeches (1,540 words)
Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Lords Chamber
Cabinet Office



Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

21 Apr 2026, 4:20 p.m. - House of Lords
"Baroness Anderson of Stoke on Trent. >> My Lords, I beg to move that the House considers the Ministerial and "
Baroness Lloyd of Effra, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026 9:30 a.m.
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK
At 10:00am: Oral evidence
The Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (Government Whip) and Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office
Ellen Atkinson - Interim Director General for the Propriety, Ethics & Constitution Group
Simon Madden - Director of Propriety and Ethics
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 21st April 2026
Oral Evidence - Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent, Ellen Atkinson, and Simon Madden

Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Found: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent, Ellen Atkinson, and Simon Madden Oral Evidence



Written Answers
Public Bodies
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL14079), whether it is still their intention to set up teams modelled on the Vaccine Taskforce to deliver Prime Ministerial priorities; and, if so, whether these teams will be subject to the new departmental accountability framework.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The government is reforming the spending control and accountability framework in order to drive better value for money and enable the public sector to deliver the government’s priorities efficiently. This ultimately means better and faster outcomes for citizens. The reforms will reinforce accountability, enable the central government functions to focus more of their efforts on building capability, and be supported by open and collaborative ways of working. From 1 April, ‘delegated authority limits’ have increased across most of government and duplication in the approvals process has been removed.

Taskforces will be given the authority to exercise unique freedoms, including the freedom to get on with the job with prioritised business case approvals and increased delegated authority limits from the Treasury as appropriate.

Ministers: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 April (HL15974), whether they plan to amend Ministerial Pension Scheme legislation to allow for pension forfeiture in cases where a minister is found guilty of (1) misconduct in public life, and (2) improper performance under the Bribery Act 2010, relating to their ministerial conduct.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

I refer the Noble Baroness to the response already provided to HL 15974:

Question: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Secretary for the Cabinet Office on 23 March (HC120630), what consideration they have given to amending primary legislation to provide for the Ministerial Pension Scheme to be in scope of forfeiture for situations where a former minister is convicted for a criminal offence in relation to their activities while serving as a minister.

Answer: The government does not currently have any plans to amend the Ministerial Pension Scheme.

Civil Servants: Media
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 April (HL16073), in what manner the disclosure of the publication date of the most recent version of the guidance to the Civil Service on speaking to the media inhibits the future policy development of changes to that guidance.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The guidance on speaking to the media is subject to ongoing policy development. Disclosing the publication date of the most recent version of the guidance could, in conjunction with other information already in the public domain, reveal the stage and direction of that development, which in turn could inhibit the free and frank provision of advice necessary for the policy process to operate effectively.

Prime Minister: Meetings
Asked by: Lord Gilbert of Panteg (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 17 March 2026 (HL14055), what is (1) the Prime Minister’s Office, and (2) their definition of a “meeting”.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

I refer the Hon Member to the answer given on 5 March, Official Report, PQ HC110411:

Question: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the answer of 13 October 2025 to Question 77563 on Palantir, whether there is a record of who the Prime Minister (a) met and (b) spoke to during that visit.

Answer: The visit was part of the Prime Minister's trip to Washington. During this visit the Prime Minister listened to a short presentation about Palantir’s work, followed by a tour of the premises and an introduction to members of staff.

In December 2025, the MOD signed an extension to the Enterprise Agreement with Palantir that had been initially awarded in November 2022, by the previous Government, and via a direct award. This extension covered existing services and ensured there was no drop-off in MOD capability in critical areas.

This contract - and all other contracts for any firm - go through the usual rigorous departmental processes and their decision makers.

Home Office: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Home Office has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Home Office keeps the commencement of its legislation under review, taking account of operational readiness and delivery of wider priorities.

This is alongside an established post-legislative scrutiny process. Responsibility sits with policy teams to monitor the status of provisions and determine appropriate timings for when they should be brought into force.

Health Services and Social Services
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 20th April 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps they have taken in the past year to meet their legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation concerning health and social care should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Policy teams within the Department of Health and Social Care keep the commencement and implementation of legislation under review. In line with established processes, we are in contact with the Health and Social Care Committee in the House of Commons to undertake required post-legislative scrutiny of relevant legislation, which includes a review of the operation of the legislation, and highlighting any measures not commenced and plans to commence them.

Senior Civil Servants: Performance Appraisal
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 17th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 February (HL14387), whether the central performance management framework for the Senior Civil Service has been, or will be, changed in order to deliver the plans set out by the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister in his speech on 20 January.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We are in the process of updating the Senior Civil Service (SCS) Performance Management Framework aimed at ensuring performance across the SCS is focused on the Prime Minister’s priorities and that underperformance is held to tougher standards and addressed as soon as it arises.

Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
Asked by: Lord Gilbert of Panteg (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 16th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 16 December 2025 (HL12742), whether the Cabinet Office holds information on the current cash equivalent transfer value of the pension scheme established under the Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Information about this Pension Scheme, including a calculation of the cash equivalent transfer value, was included in the Crown Prosecution Service's annual report and accounts for 2013-14. There has been no change to the policy under the last Administration not to publish information about civil servants' individual pensions apart from in the remuneration reports contained in departmental annual reports and accounts.

Cabinet Office: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 16th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Cabinet Office has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Cabinet Office conducts regular reviews to prioritise the commencement of legislation as soon as is reasonably practicable to do so, and taking into account departmental objectives.

The Cabinet Office has made two Commencement Orders in the past year to bring legislation within its remit into force as appropriate.



Parliamentary Research
Research and development (R&D) for UK defence - POST-PN-0766
Apr. 20 2026

Found: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent said in February 2024 that the project lacks “clarity and direction



Deposited Papers
Thursday 16th April 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Letter dated 09/04/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Lord Empey regarding the debate on the Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee's report 'Northern Ireland after Brexit': review of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement. 2p.
Document: Letter_from_Baroness_Anderson_to_Lord_Empey.docx.pdf (PDF)

Found: Letter dated 09/04/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Lord Empey regarding the debate on

Wednesday 15th April 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Letter dated 31/03/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Finn regarding the draft Procurement (Amendment) Regulations 2026 debate: guidance and support to contracting authorities in respect of data standards and reporting formats. 2p.
Document: 2026-03-31_-_B_Anderson_to_B_Finn_re_Procurement_Regulations_2026.pdf (PDF)

Found: Letter dated 31/03/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Finn regarding the draft