Information between 18th July 2026 - 16th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 220 |
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146 |
|
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234 |
|
22 Jul 2026 - Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 56 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 95 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - ACAS Code of Practice on Time Off for Trade Union Duties and Activities - View Vote Context Baroness Berridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 56 Noes - 82 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Berridge speeches from: Conduct of Undercover Policing and Surveillance Operatives Bill [HL]
Baroness Berridge contributed 1 speech (653 words) 2nd reading Friday 17th July 2026 - Lords Chamber |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Juries
Asked by: Baroness Berridge (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 1st October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made the effectiveness of the Juror Appreciation Week initiative in boosting recognition of jurors. Answered by Lord Lemos - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) The Government values the contribution of jurors throughout the year. Since the ‘Juror Appreciation Week’ initiative was launched in 2024, the Government has supported awareness-raising across a range of channels, including social media, blogs and other digital content, which has seen strong public engagement with the materials we have shared. In 2026, we supported Juror Appreciation Week through communications recognising the contribution of jurors and promoting information about jury service and the support available to jurors. This included a student myth-busting video, a social media poll, a podcast on jury service, juror information content and publication of the evaluation of the Enhanced Support for Jurors pilot. More widely, the Government remains committed to recognising the important contribution made by jurors and continues to promote awareness of jury service and juror support through its wider communications and operational activity. |
|
Juries
Asked by: Baroness Berridge (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 1st October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government why they did not support Juror Appreciation Week in 2026. Answered by Lord Lemos - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) The Government values the contribution of jurors throughout the year. Since the ‘Juror Appreciation Week’ initiative was launched in 2024, the Government has supported awareness-raising across a range of channels, including social media, blogs and other digital content, which has seen strong public engagement with the materials we have shared. In 2026, we supported Juror Appreciation Week through communications recognising the contribution of jurors and promoting information about jury service and the support available to jurors. This included a student myth-busting video, a social media poll, a podcast on jury service, juror information content and publication of the evaluation of the Enhanced Support for Jurors pilot. More widely, the Government remains committed to recognising the important contribution made by jurors and continues to promote awareness of jury service and juror support through its wider communications and operational activity. |
|
Samaritans: Juries
Asked by: Baroness Berridge (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 1st October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the support to jurors provided by Samaritans between 2022 and 2025. Answered by Lord Lemos - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) Jury service is an important civic duty, and the Government is committed to ensuring jurors feel supported throughout their service. The Government did not undertake a specific assessment of the support provided to jurors by Samaritans between 2022 and 2025. During this period, jurors experiencing distress were signpost by HMCTS to Samaritans’, alongside support available through their GP. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Sep 2026, 11:51 a.m. - Justice and Home Affairs Committee "Baroness Berridge " Baroness Berridge - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 10:46 a.m. - Justice and Home Affairs Committee "Sorry, Baroness Berridge first. Oh, " Lord Foster of Bath - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 11:05 a.m. - Justice and Home Affairs Committee "Baroness Berridge? " Lord Foster of Bath - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 11:18 a.m. - Justice and Home Affairs Committee "Baroness Berridge. " Lord Foster of Bath - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 8th October 2026
Written Evidence - Manchester Metropolitan University, and Manchester Metropolitan University SFJ0026 - Support for Jurors Support for Jurors - Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: Baroness Berridge asked us about the influence that graphic moving evidence can have upon jurors. |
|
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes for House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee 11th Meeting 26-27 8 September 2026 Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: held at 10:30am on Tuesday, 8 September 2026 P resent: Lord Anderson of Ipswich Lord Bach Baroness Berridge |
|
Wednesday 9th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes for House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee 10th Meeting 26-27 2 September 2026 Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: at 10:30am on Wednesday, 2 September 2026 Present: Lord Anderson of Ipswich Lord Bach Baroness Berridge |
|
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Park Square Barristers, and QEB Hollis Whitman Support for Jurors - Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: meeting Members present: Lord Foster of Bath (The Chair); Lord Anderson of Ipswich; Lord Bach; Baroness Berridge |
|
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - GMB Support for Jurors - Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: meeting Members present: Lord Foster of Bath (The Chair); Lord Anderson of Ipswich; Lord Bach; Baroness Berridge |
|
Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes for House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee 9th Meeting 26-27 21 July 2026 Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: Minutes of the 9th Meeting, held at 10:30am on Tuesday, 21 July 2026 Present: Lord Bach Baroness Berridge |
|
Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Oral Evidence - Manchester Metropolitan University, and Manchester Metropolitan University Support for Jurors - Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: Baroness Berridge: You have talked about mitigation afterwards. |
|
Tuesday 21st July 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes for House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee 8th Meeting 26-27 14 July 2026 Justice and Home Affairs Committee Found: Meeting, held at 10:30am on Tuesday, 14 July 2026 Present: Lord Anderson of Ipswich Lord Bach Baroness Berridge |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Jul 2026
Support for Jurors Justice and Home Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The Justice and Home Affairs Committee is undertaking a short investigation into support for jurors in England and Wales, focusing on the health and mental health impact of the experience of being a juror. |