IPP Sentences Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice
Monday 15th September 2025

(2 days, 14 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
None Portrait Noble Lords
- Hansard -

Lib Dems!

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Timpson Portrait Lord Timpson (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble and learned Lord for his question, and for the work that he and the noble and learned Lord Thomas have done on this area. It is really important, and the focus has been very helpful. Already, the documents are clearer and more focused. Senior managers now oversee all recall decisions. From 3 November this year, we are extending the post-recall timeframes to improve planning and decision-making. That is thanks to Shirley Debono, who has helped us on that as well. The multidisciplinary progression panels are the way to do this, because we need to make sure that everybody who is in prison on an IPP sentence has hope, engages with the action plan, gets out and stays out.

Baroness Blower Portrait Baroness Blower (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, can the Minister explain why IPP prisoners have to go to such lengths to prove that they are safe to leave custody before being released, while others in prison for similar offences do not? Does he agree that this difference in treatment is a further injustice against IPP prisoners, and that it is vital and urgent that we make progress in this area?

Lord Timpson Portrait Lord Timpson (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Parole Board are the experts in deciding who is safe to be released. The release tests that it has are robust and fair, but we need to make sure that when people are in front of it, they are in a really good position to be released and released safely.