Information between 6th March 2026 - 16th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 183 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Hayman of Ullock speeches from: Sustainable Farming Incentive: Small Farms
Baroness Hayman of Ullock contributed 9 speeches (763 words) Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Insecticides: Pets
Asked by: Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 5 February (HL14038), why the potential risks of chronic exposure to users and children is not listed in the Veterinary Medicines Directorate product information database of authorised products. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) When conducting a user risk assessment, before a veterinary medicine is authorised, both the hazards and the likely exposures to humans, including the children in a household, are considered. Data from both acute and chronic toxicology studies using animal models are used to identify the possible negative reactions that may be seen in humans if exposed. Several exposure scenarios are considered, including reasonable worst-case scenarios, leading to a conservative estimate of the actual risks to those that may come into contact with a veterinary medicine. A hazard may be identified, but if the exposure to the medicines is likely to be low, then this leads to minimal risk to the person. If risks are identified, they are listed on the product information database, alongside advice on how to minimise those risks. VMD collects data on adverse reactions reported to them and to pharmaceutical companies, once a product is on the market, and can update the risk profile and user warnings where these data indicate a concern. |
|
Veterinary Services: Insecticides
Asked by: Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 5 February (HL14039), (1) when the regulatory review of the AVM‑GSL status of products containing fipronil and imidacloprid will be completed, and (2) whether input from vets and scientists external to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate will be consulted and contribute to the review. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) is undertaking a review of the AVM‑GSL status of veterinary medicines containing fipronil and imidacloprid, and further details on the review will be published in the coming weeks. A completion date cannot yet be provided as this is dependent on finalising the process and associated milestones.
The review will include a consultative process, drawing on evidence and input from all stakeholders. All decisions will be based on robust scientific assessment, with animal health and welfare remaining paramount throughout the review. |
|
Fungi: Conservation
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer from Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 26 November 2025 (HL11789), what steps they have taken to communicate the ambition of the International Fungal Conservation Pledge and ensure national alignment with the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs' national team, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and devolved government agencies. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Further to those actions set out in our response to PQ UIN HL11789, in September 2025 Defra participated in the launch of the UK Network for Fungal Conservation. The network, which currently includes Defra, NE, JNCC, NIEA and DAERA membership, brings together representatives from statutory bodies, research institutes, conservation NGOs and other fungal conservation professionals to work on fungal conservation across the UK. During the first quarter of 2026, the network will work on a collaborative new strategy and delivery plan for fungal conservation in the UK, enabling its integration with the new global strategy for fungal conservation.
Additionally, and in line with the UK’s commitment to the International Fungal Conservation Pledge, the UK led a proposal at CoP20 (December 2025) to develop a programme of work on how CITES should be applied to fungi in practice. This proposal was adopted by the Parties. |
| Welsh Government Publications |
|---|
|
Monday 9th March 2026
Source Page: Written Statement: The REACH (Amendment) Regulations 2026 (9 March 2026) Document: Written Statement: The REACH (Amendment) Regulations 2026 (9 March 2026) (webpage) Found: Article 4A(3) of (EC) No 1907/2006 (“UK REACH”) Welsh Ministers’ consent was sought from Baroness Hayman of Ullock |