Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest

Information between 1st December 2025 - 20th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Thursday 22nd January 2026
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest (Conservative - Life peer)

Debate - Main Chamber
Subject: Impact of government policy on hospitality and retail sectors
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 201 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 153
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 154 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 157 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 156


Speeches
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest contributed 1 speech (382 words)
Committee stage
Friday 16th January 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest contributed 1 speech (106 words)
Committee stage
Friday 12th December 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Supported Housing: Learning Disability
Asked by: Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 4th December 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of closures of intentional communities on people with severe learning disabilities.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

No formal national assessment has been undertaken, and the Government does not monitor the operation or closure of intentional communities.

We want to ensure that people with a learning disability and autistic people get the support they need in the community and are given a choice about where and with whom they live, including small-scale supported living, and settled accommodation.

Local authorities are best placed to understand and plan for the care needs of their populations, and to develop and build local market capacity. That is why under the Care Act 2014, local authorities are required to shape their local markets, and ensure that people have a range of high-quality, sustainable, and person-centred care and support options available to them, and that they can access the services that best meet their needs.

Any health and social care provider that carries out a regulated activity must register with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the independent regulator of health and social care in England. The CQC can take action, in line with their Enforcement Policy, if the quality or safety of a service has fallen to unacceptable levels. The CQC is not closing down existing services that provide good care, including services developed as village communities. The CQC does not direct commissioning decisions, which remain the responsibility of local authorities. The CQC’s Enforcement Policy is available on the CQC website, in an online only format.

As a response to the independent review into the CQC’s regulation of Whorlton Hall, the CQC has strengthened its regulatory approach for services for autistic people and people with a learning disability. This included updating the statutory guidance, titled Right support, right care, right culture, which sets out regulatory expectations for any service that currently provides or intends to provide regulated care to autistic people and people with a learning disability.

Employment: Learning Disability
Asked by: Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 8th December 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will implement specific measures to support people with learning disabilities into work; and if so, when.

Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

People with learning disabilities often face very significant challenges in being able to find work. We know that most people with learning disabilities want to have a job, and evidence shows that they bring many positive benefits to their employers.

Connect to Work is our voluntary, locally commissioned, Supported Employment programme which is rolling out this year and early 2026. This £1bn programme is for anyone who is disabled, has a health condition or is experiencing more complex barriers to work and will support around 300,000 people by the end of the decade. Participants are given a dedicated specialist employment support adviser who works alongside them to understand their career goals and help them to address any specific barriers to employment. Local Authorities are required to follow two models of Supported Employment – Individual Placement and Support and Supported Employment Quality Framework. The latter framework has been specifically designed, and has a proven track record, to support individuals with learning disabilities or who are neurodivergent to get into sustainable employment.

Fraud: Retail Trade
Asked by: Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 11th December 2025

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that suspected fraudulent activity in retail business premises can be investigated and tackled by the police.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

In March this year, the National Crime Agency coordinated a three-week crackdown (Operation MACHINIZE) against business premises such as barber shops and other cash intensive businesses across England and Wales. Operation MACHINIZE involved 19 different police forces and Regional Organised Crime Units, as well as national agencies including HM Revenue & Customs, Trading Standards and Home Office Immigration Enforcement. In total, 380 premises were visited across the three-week operation with officers securing freezing orders over bank accounts totalling in excess of one million pounds, executing 84 warrants and arresting 35 individuals.

This has been followed by a second phase of activity throughout October which involved every UK police force and Regional Organised Crime Unit. During the operation, which targeted a broader range of businesses, the operation saw: 2,734 premises visited and raided; 924 individuals arrested; over £13m of suspected criminal proceeds seized or restrained; and over £2.7m worth of illicit commodities destroyed.

At the Budget 2025, the Chancellor announced a new dedicated cross-government taskforce to design systemic interventions to disrupt money laundering and related criminality on the high street, as well as new funding for operational partners such as law enforcement and Trading Standards to tackle this threat.