Information between 2nd March 2026 - 12th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 105 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 110 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 11 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson contributed 1 speech (84 words) Report stage part two Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson speeches from: Maternity Commissioner
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson contributed 1 speech (62 words) Wednesday 4th March 2026 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson contributed 2 speeches (610 words) Report stage: Part 1 Monday 2nd March 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NHS: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to monitor the delivery of efficiency savings by NHS England, integrated care boards and NHS providers in order to fund the NHS Agenda for Change staff pay award 2026–27; and what steps they plan to take to ensure that those savings do not impact frontline services. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government has accepted the NHS Pay Review Body (NHSPRB) recommendation for a 2026/27 headline pay award, for all National Health Service staff on Agenda for Change (AfC), of a 3.3% pay rise effective from April 2026. We hugely appreciate the work of so many talented staff across the NHS. Accepting the recommendation gives NHS staff on AfC a deserved real terms pay rise. The additional pressure above 2.5% affordability will be managed by the Department and the arms length bodies, including NHS England’s central budgets, but will not be paid for by cutting frontline services or an additional efficiency ask of integrated care boards and providers. At the 2024 Autumn Statement and in our NHSPRB evidence, the Government reaffirmed its commitment to a 2% annual productivity growth target for the NHS and productivity is currently ahead of this target at 2.8% for the first seven months in this financial year. In 2025/26, systems have planned £11.1 billion of efficiencies and savings, or 7.1% of the total allocation. The planned efficiency and savings for the 2026/27 financial year will be finalised as part of the normal planning process that is currently underway. Both efficiency and productivity performance is monitored on a monthly basis as part of our routine financial management to ensure the NHS lives within its budget. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NHS: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the cash value of the productivity and efficiency savings to be made by NHS England, integrated care boards and NHS providers in order to fund the NHS Agenda for Change staff pay award 2026–27. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government has accepted the NHS Pay Review Body (NHSPRB) recommendation for a 2026/27 headline pay award, for all National Health Service staff on Agenda for Change (AfC), of a 3.3% pay rise effective from April 2026. We hugely appreciate the work of so many talented staff across the NHS. Accepting the recommendation gives NHS staff on AfC a deserved real terms pay rise. The additional pressure above 2.5% affordability will be managed by the Department and the arms length bodies, including NHS England’s central budgets, but will not be paid for by cutting frontline services or an additional efficiency ask of integrated care boards and providers. At the 2024 Autumn Statement and in our NHSPRB evidence, the Government reaffirmed its commitment to a 2% annual productivity growth target for the NHS and productivity is currently ahead of this target at 2.8% for the first seven months in this financial year. In 2025/26, systems have planned £11.1 billion of efficiencies and savings, or 7.1% of the total allocation. The planned efficiency and savings for the 2026/27 financial year will be finalised as part of the normal planning process that is currently underway. Both efficiency and productivity performance is monitored on a monthly basis as part of our routine financial management to ensure the NHS lives within its budget. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prescription Drugs: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they still plan to increase the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost per quality-adjusted life years thresholds in April; and what steps they will take to implement that increase. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) currently assesses value for money for the National Health Service by applying a standard cost-effectiveness range of £20,000 to £30,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained over and above current treatments. As part of the landmark pharmaceuticals trade deal with the United States of America, it has been agreed that the cost-effectiveness threshold will be increased to £25,000 to £35,000 per QALY. My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, does not currently have the legal power to direct NICE to amend the cost-effectiveness threshold used in its technology appraisal or highly specialised technology programmes. The Government has therefore proceeded to amend the NICE regulations, to give ministers a limited power of direction to set the core cost-effectiveness threshold that NICE uses in the development of guidance, and remove the requirement for NICE to consult on methods changes where these result from a ministerial direction. The regulation change has been made by a statutory instrument which was laid before Parliament on 3 March 2026 and, subject to the will of Parliament, will come into force on 24 March 2026. In line with the United Kingdom-United States’ deal, NICE will implement the cost-effectiveness threshold increase in April 2026, following a direction from my Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prescription Drugs: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals which are paused pending increases in the cost per quality-adjusted life year threshold in April. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) There are currently two appraisals paused, at the request of the company, until the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has the power to apply the new cost-effectiveness threshold:
NICE anticipates that its cost-effectiveness threshold will increase in April 2026 and will provide a further update to stakeholders at that time. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NHS: Pay
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what the cash value is of the productivity and efficiency savings they assumed in their submission to the NHS Pay Review Body for the NHS Agenda for Change staff pay award 2026–27; and whether they assumed those savings could be released (1) at the beginning of the financial year, or (2) during the financial year. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) At the 2024 Autumn Statement, the Government reaffirmed its commitment to a 2% annual productivity growth target for the National Health Service. This is a stretching but essential ambition to ensure the NHS can meet rising demand within a tight financial settlement and return to pre-pandemic productivity levels. Detail on this was provided as part of the pay review body written evidence to give context to the wider NHS England financial position against which decisions are set.
Currently NHS productivity is running ahead of the 2% target, and increased by 2.8% in the first seven months of this financial year. This builds on the 2.7% growth between the 2024/25 and 2023/24 financial years. Consequently, we remain confident in delivering the 2% target.
The pay review body evidence did not set an explicit efficiency target. In practice, efficiency savings as a percentage run well ahead of 2% because they including non-recurrent savings and technical efficiencies, for instance reductions in agency costs, that are outside of productivity calculations. In 2024/25, NHS systems planned what was then the most ambitious efficiency and savings measures to date, targeting £9.3 billion, the equivalent to 6.1% of their total allocation. In 2025/26, systems have planned £11.1 billion of efficiencies and savings, 7.1% of the total allocation. NHS England will finalise planned efficiency and savings for the 2026/27 financial year as part of the normal planning process that is currently underway. Efficiencies are delivered throughout the course of the financial year, rather than all upfront at the start of the year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NHS: Pay
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of (1) the total cost of the 2026–27 pay award for NHS Agenda for Change staff in England, and (2) the cost of that award above the affordability assumption set out in their evidence to the NHS Pay Review Body. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government has accepted the NHS Pay Review Body recommendation for the 2026/27 headline pay award, for all National Health Service staff on Agenda for Change terms and conditions in England, of a 3.3% consolidated pay rise effective from April 2026. The pay uplift is above the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecast inflation of 2.2% for 2026/27 and delivers a real terms pay rise for NHS staff. The total cost for the 2026/27 pay award is estimated to be £3,250 million, and the likely impact above the 2.5% affordability assumption is estimated to be approximately £800 million. However, the exact cost will vary depending on the workforce size and composition during the year. This additional pressure above affordability will be managed by the Department and our arms length bodies, including NHS England central budgets, but the pay increases will not be paid for by cutting frontline services. It is vital that pay awards are fair for both workers and the taxpayer, so public services can deliver high-quality services across the country. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Department of Education: Public Expenditure
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 12th March 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government how much resource and capital was allocated to the Department of Education in the Spending Review 2025 for (1) 2026–27, (2) 2027–28, and (3) 2028–29; whether they have revised the spending allocations for that department at any point since the Spending Review 2025 on 11 June 2025; and if so, whether they will publish the revised spending allocations for capital and resource in each of those years. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) All departments’ Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL) budgets are freely available on GOV.UK.
DfE’s DEL budgets allocated at the Spending Review 2025 were:
Revised budgets were published at the Autumn Budget in 2025:
|
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 29th April 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 20th May 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd June 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th June 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th June 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The role of ambulance services in supporting accident and emergency departments View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026 11 a.m. Public Services Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The role of ambulance services in supporting accident and emergency departments View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Mar 2026
The role of ambulance services in supporting accident and emergency departments Public Services Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions No description available |