Information between 1st November 2025 - 1st December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Tyler of Enfield voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Tree Felling: Enfield
Asked by: Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks made by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 24 April (HL Deb col 756–7), what progress has the Forestry Commission made in its investigation into the illegal felling of the Whitewebbs Oak that took place on 3 April. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) It is acknowledged that the works to this ancient tree caused public concern. The Forestry Commission has carried out a site inspection and detailed review to determine whether there have been any breaches of the Forestry Act 1967 in relation to the tree works on the Oak.
The Forestry Commission review has concluded that in this case, there have been no breaches of the Forestry Act 1967 or the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Forestry) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999.
The decision of the Forestry Commission does not reflect the decisions or actions of other public bodies or individuals who may be conducting investigations or initiating proceedings in relation to any other alleged offences or civil matters other than those set out within the Forestry Act 1967 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Forestry) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Monday 17th November 2025
Oral Evidence - AUKUS Industry Forum, Tiberius Aerospace, and Syos Aerospace The National Security Strategy - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Edward Morello; Lord Robathan; Lord Sarfraz; Lord Sedwill; Lord Tunnicliffe; Derek Twigg; Baroness Tyler of Enfield |
|
Monday 17th November 2025
Oral Evidence - City St George’s, University of London, and University of Oxford The National Security Strategy - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Edward Morello; Lord Robathan; Lord Sarfraz; Lord Sedwill; Lord Tunnicliffe; Derek Twigg; Baroness Tyler of Enfield |
|
Monday 3rd November 2025
Oral Evidence - Jonathan Hall KC, and Lord Sumption OBE PC, FSA, FRHistS The National Security Strategy - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Martin; Edward Morello; Lord Robathan; Emily Thornberry; Lord Tunnicliffe; Derek Twigg; Baroness Tyler of Enfield |
|
Monday 3rd November 2025
Oral Evidence - Isabel Hilton OBE, Lord Patten of Barnes, and MI6 The National Security Strategy - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Martin; Edward Morello; Lord Robathan; Emily Thornberry; Lord Tunnicliffe; Derek Twigg; Baroness Tyler of Enfield |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025
Oral Evidence - Attorney General's Office, and Duchy of Lancaster Espionage cases and the Official Secrets Acts - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Morello; Lord Robathan; Lord Sedwill; Andy Slaughter; Emily Thornberry; Lord Tunnicliffe; Baroness Tyler of Enfield |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025
Oral Evidence - Attorney General's Office, and Duchy of Lancaster Espionage cases and the Official Secrets Acts - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Morello; Lord Robathan; Lord Sedwill; Andy Slaughter; Emily Thornberry; Lord Tunnicliffe; Baroness Tyler of Enfield |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 17th November 2025 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: The National Security Strategy At 4:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Sir Anthony Finkelstein CBE - Former Chief Scientific Adviser for National Security Deputy (2015-2021) and President at City St George’s, University of London Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt - Executive Chair & Co-founder at Open Data Institute, and Principal of Jesus College and Professorial Research Fellow in Computer Science at University of Oxford At 5:15pm: Oral evidence Sophia Gaston - Visiting Fellow in the Department of War Studies, King’s College London, and Founder and Lead at AUKUS Industry Forum Air Commodore (retd) Blythe Crawford CBE - Former Commandant of the Air and Space Warfare Centre and Director GRAIL (Generative Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Lethality) at Tiberius Aerospace Lieutenant Colonel (retd) Haydn Gaukroger OBE - Head of Capability Development at Syos Aerospace View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 1st December 2025 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 15th December 2025 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |