Information between 18th July 2025 - 28th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 9th September 2025 Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Debate - Grand Committee Subject: Joint Committee on Human Rights report: 'Accountability for Daesh Crimes' View calendar - Add to calendar |
Division Votes |
---|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House One of 18 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House One of 24 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and against the House One of 34 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House One of 33 Crossbench Aye votes vs 4 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and in line with the House One of 27 Crossbench Aye votes vs 2 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Alton of Liverpool voted Aye and against the House One of 11 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: “Hillsborough Law”
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 1 speech (229 words) Thursday 24th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Great British Energy: Nuclear Development
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 1 speech (84 words) Tuesday 22nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber |
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 1 speech (225 words) Tuesday 22nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
Lord Alton of Liverpool speeches from: Official Development Assistance
Lord Alton of Liverpool contributed 1 speech (143 words) Monday 21st July 2025 - Lords Chamber |
Written Answers |
---|
Poverty: Children
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Children's Commissioner's report Growing up in a low income family - children's experiences, published on 8 July; and what actions they intend to take to address the levels of child poverty in England identified by the report. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Child Poverty Taskforce, co-chaired by the Work and Pensions and Education Secretaries, is committed to listening to the voices of children and families and embed the voices of these families directly into their work.
The Office of the Children’s Commissioner’s report, Growing up in a low-income family: Children‘s experiences, was commissioned by the Child Poverty Taskforce to provide evidence on children’s lived experience of poverty to support the development of an ambitious child poverty strategy. The findings of the report make for uncomfortable reading, but it is vital that we face up to the reality of what children in poverty are feeling so we can develop a Strategy that is fit for purpose and truly responds to the needs of children as they set out from their perspective. This valuable research forms part of the Taskforce’s ongoing wider work to ensure those voices are a central part of developing a strategy.
The Child Poverty Unit, based in the Cabinet Office, worked closely with the Office of the Children’s Commissioner on the report, including at research design and reporting stages, and the findings have already been considered as part of strategy development.
The Minister for School Standards is planning to meet with the Children‘s Commissioner for England to discuss the report in detail and a Children’s Commissioners roundtable, co-chaired by the Minister for Employment and the Minister for School Standards, will be held in September to bring together all four Children’s Commissioners for a broader discussion on child poverty.
The Taskforce is considering the report’s recommendations in advance of publication of the strategy in the autumn. |
Nigeria: Armed Conflict
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Collins of Highbury on 23 June (HL8468), what assessment they have made of the root causes of the conflict in Benue, in particular of the role of religion. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The UK Government is deeply concerned about the ongoing violence in Nigeria's Middle Belt and we express our sincere concern for all those impacted. The root causes of intercommunal violence are complex and often linked to land disputes, historical tensions, and criminal activity. While religion is not a causal factor in these conflicts, the impacts are felt acutely by religious communities, including hindering people's ability to practice their faith freely. The UK supports all affected communities, regardless of faith or ethnicity, and is working through programmes like Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria and the UK-Nigeria Security and Defence Partnership to promote peace, strengthen local institutions, and protect civilians. The UK remains committed to defending Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB), with Nigeria a priority country under the new FoRB strategy, and we will continue to raise this issue in our engagements with Nigeria. |
Ethiopia: Armed Conflict
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assistance they are providing to victims of conflict-related sexual violence in Ethiopia; how this assistance will be affected by the cuts to Official Development Assistance; and how they are coordinating the responses to atrocity crimes in Ethiopia with other countries. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The UK has played a critical role in supporting survivor-centred humanitarian interventions in Ethiopia, particularly in response to conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) in Tigray and other conflict-affected regions. The UK has prioritised healthcare, psychosocial support, access to justice, as well as policy efforts to increase accountability. In the last financial year, we allocated £4.6 million to deliver Gender Based Violence (GBV) and child protection services in Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia and Somali regions. Between June 2023 and January 2025, GBV and child protection services reached over 50,000 women and girls, across 19 health facilities in affected regions. The UK remains committed to preventing CRSV and funding for GBV prevention and response has increased this financial year. Funding for future years has not yet been allocated. |
Arms Trade Treaty
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, following the judgment by the High Court in R (Al-Haq) v Secretary of State for Business and Trade [2025] EWHC 1615 (Admin) on 30 June, whether they plan to consider the incorporation of the Arms Trade Treaty into domestic law. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The Government is fully committed to international law and acts in a manner that is consistent with our international obligations and commitments. We remain strongly committed to the Arms Trade Treaty and to act accordingly. Our export control regime remains consistent with our international obligations. |
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Thursday 24th July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the lessons learned from the Afghanistan data loss incident. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has commissioned several audits at various times since the data protection incident relating to the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy to inform remediation plans. All recommendations from these audits have been accepted and are either complete or work-in-progress.
It is a key priority of this Government to reinforce data handling practices. Within the Defence Afghan Relocation and Resettlement (DARR) team we have introduced a new casework management system which prioritises data protection. We also recently completed a comprehensive review on legacy data held within this casework management system and historic email accounts to ensure information is held at the right security classification and within the right location, which also enhances the case-working capability. This includes the application of need-to-know principles, with shared sites locked down and proactively managed.
A new senior civil servant level Chief Information Officer was appointed within the DARR team in October 2024 with responsibility for a larger and more skilled data and information management team. They produced a data strategy in line with the Government Digital Services’ data maturity assessment and this is shaped by priorities as identified from the myriad internal and external audits.
We regularly emphasise the need to complete the relevant mandatory training across DARR and all current staff have completed it. Bespoke induction training includes security briefings and data protection training, and there are regular communications on protecting information and expected behaviours, including discussions at senior leadership level.
We are continuously investing in our cybersecurity infrastructure to ensure we remain resilient against evolving threats. Through targeted interventions, campaigns, and role-specific training, we are embedding a culture where every individual understands their role in safeguarding Defence. By reinforcing positive cyber habits and reducing human cyber risk, we are building a workforce that is confident, capable, and cyber secure.
|
Ethiopia: Genocide Convention
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Friday 25th July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are taking steps, alone or in partnership with other countries, to initiate proceedings against Ethiopia before the International Court of Justice for violations of the Genocide Convention. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) Our approach to genocide determination does not, and has not, prevented us from taking action to call out and seek to address atrocities, or work to build resilience in places where there are risks of instability and violence. Where we see immediate risks of atrocities, we raise our concerns bilaterally with the countries involved and multilaterally through international organisations. On 15 November 2023, the UK jointly with Canada, Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands filed a declaration of intervention at the International Court of Justice in order to set out our interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Genocide Convention before the Court. This, and Written Observations submitted to the Court in March 2025, are intended to assist the court in its independent deliberations. The UK has not initiated proceedings against the Government of Ethiopia. It is the long-standing policy of the UK Government that any formal determination as to whether genocide has occurred should be made following a judgment by a competent national or international court. This policy is consistent with our obligations under the Genocide Convention, providing a clear, impartial and independent measure for the determination of whether genocide has occurred. |
Ethiopia: Crimes against Humanity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Friday 25th July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to initiate a structural investigation into international crimes in Ethiopia. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The UK co-sponsored the establishment of the Independent Commission on Human Rights in Ethiopia (ICHREE). The UK welcomed the 2023 ICHREE report and its recommendations. We repeatedly call, publicly and privately, for independent investigations into conflict related human rights violations and for perpetrators to be held to account. The UK is financing international monitors from Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOHCR) and building the investigative capacity of the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (EHRC) through our human rights and peacebuilding programme. We also support multiple dialogue initiatives across Ethiopia to find political solutions to conflict and help end conflict related human rights abuses. Where we see immediate risks of atrocities, we raise our concerns bilaterally with the countries involved and multilaterally through international organisations. |
Lebanon: Christianity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Friday 25th July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made with the government of Lebanon regarding protections for Christian churches in Lebanon. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) Continued escalation across the Israel-Lebanon Blue Line, and its impact upon communities on both sides of the border is deeply concerning. The Government of Lebanon has cited its commitment to freedom of religion. We encourage Lebanon to meet its international obligations and uphold the values of equality and religious coexistence that are enshrined in its national laws. The UK Government remains steadfast in its commitment to promoting and protecting the right to freedom of religion or belief globally. |
Algeria: Christianity
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Monday 28th July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, following the Arab Parliament’s defence of Algeria’s religious freedom record, what assessment they have made of restrictions on religious freedom faced by Christian communities in Algeria. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The UK champions Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) for all. It is our firm opinion that no one should live in fear because of what they do or do not believe. Our Embassy in Algiers raises FoRB with the Algerian authorities, doing so most recently when our Ambassador met the Minister of Religious Affairs on 10 February. Our Embassy remains in regular contact with minority religious groups on how best to support FoRB. We will continue to raise the issue and advocate for freedom of expression, including for Christian communities in Algeria. |
Syria: Children
Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench - Life peer) Monday 28th July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the situation of children in Syria, including those held in camps and detention and rehabilitation facilities in north-east Syria; and what assistance they are providing for child-focused humanitarian initiatives in that country. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) There are over seven million children in need of humanitarian assistance in Syria and more than two million out of school. Through INGOs and UN organisations, the UK aims to help children across the country, including in North-East Syria, through multi-sectoral support including water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH), education, health, nutrition and child protection services. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025
61 speeches (17,728 words) Tuesday 22nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: None hope the Minister will be able to answer them, including the question from the noble Lord, Lord Alton of Liverpool - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Thursday 24th July 2025
Report - 6th Report - Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains Human Rights (Joint Committee) Found: Current membership House of Lords Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench; Life peer) (Chair) Lord Dholakia |
Parliamentary Research |
---|
Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Bill: HL Bill 127 of 2024–25 - LLN-2025-0029
Jul. 24 2025 Found: Mr Jarvis also made these points in a letter to Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench), chair of the Joint |
Humanitarian situation in Sudan - CDP-2025-0167
Jul. 17 2025 Found: Sudan: Armed Conflict 8 Jul 2025 | HL8679 Asked by: Lord Alton of Liverpool To ask His Majesty's |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
23 Jul 2025
Proposal for a draft Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2025 Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select) Not accepting submissions Background Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that in proceedings under that Act in respect of a judicial act done in good faith, damages may not be awarded except in two circumstances. The first is to compensate a person to the extent required by Article 5(5) of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’) (deprivation of liberty). The second is to compensate a person for a judicial act that is incompatible with Article 6 ECHR (right to fair trial) in circumstances where the person is detained and, but for the incompatibility, the person would not have been detained or would not have been detained for so long. In the case of Re W (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140, the Court of Appeal found that accusations of professional misconduct against a witness made by a Family Court judge breached her rights under Article 8 of the ECHR (right to respect for private life). In its judgment of 22 June 2021 in SW v United Kingdom (Application no. 87/18), the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the ECHR (right to an effective remedy), because the effect of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was that the witness could not bring a claim for damages in respect of a judicial act that was incompatible with Article 8. Government proposals On 17 July 2025, the Government laid before both Houses of Parliament its proposal for a Remedial Order to amend the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposed order is intended to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in SW v United Kingdom, by remedying the incompatibility of section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 with Article 13 of the ECHR. The Government proposes to address this incompatibility by amending section 9(3) to allow damages to be awarded to compensate a person for a judicial act on an additional basis: that the judicial act is incompatible with Article 8 on the ground that it was done in such a procedurally defective way as to amount to a breach of the requirements of procedural fairness under that Article. Section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 was previously amended by the Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2020 to give effect to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Hammerton v United Kingdom (Application no. 6287/10). See the Fifteenth Report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights of Session 2017-19, and its Second Report of Session 2019-21.
Remedial Orders Section 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives Ministers of the Crown the power to make remedial orders. The section applies if it appears to the Minister that, having regard to a finding of the European Court of Human Rights in proceedings against the United Kingdom, a provision of legislation is incompatible with an obligation of the United Kingdom arising from the Convention. In those circumstances, the Minister may by order make such amendments to the legislation as the Minister considers necessary to remove the incompatibility, if the Minister considers that there are compelling reasons for doing so. Reporting on the proposal The Joint Committee on Human Rights is required to report to Parliament on any proposal for a remedial order to be made under the Human Rights Act 1998. The Committee has 60 sitting days to report to each House its recommendation whether a draft order in the same terms as the proposal should be laid before the House. |
25 Jun 2025
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select) Submit Evidence (by 5 Sep 2025)
In recent years there has been growth in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. These can be used for a wide variety of applications. There is no universally agreed definition of AI or AI technologies. The then Government’s 2023 policy paper on “A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation” defined Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI systems or AI technologies as “products and services that are ‘adaptable’ and ‘autonomous’.” Adaptability refers to AI systems, after being trained, developing the ability to perform new ways of finding patterns and connections in data that are not directly envisioned by their human programmers. Autonomy refers to AI systems making decisions without the intent or ongoing control of a human. Many argue that AI technologies can offer great benefits to individuals and society – for example, assisting in decision-making and improving productivity. Others are concerned about risks such as:
On 5 September 2024, the UK signed the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. It is the first legally binding treaty in this area and "aims to ensure that activities within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems are fully consistent with human rights, democracy and the rule of law, while being conducive to technological progress and innovation." The UK also adheres to the OECD’s AI Principles, which were the “first intergovernmental standard on AI”. The five principles are:
The UK Government has signalled its intention to “bring forward legislation which allows us to safely realise the enormous benefits and opportunities of the most powerful AI systems for years to come.” (PQ 41098 on Artificial Intelligence: Regulation, 31 March 2025) Against this backdrop, the Joint Committee on Human Rights will explore what regulation might be required in order to safeguard human rights when AI technologies are being developed and used, and any implications this might have for future legislation. The inquiry will not be considering topics such as social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms,[3] or how malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy.[4] While these are important topics, they are outside the scope of this inquiry.
[1] POSTbrief 57, Artificial intelligence: An explainer, 14 December 2023 [2] UK Parliament, Artificial Intelligence (AI) glossary, January 2024 [3] The subject of a report by the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee: Social media, misinformation and harmful algorithms [4] The subject of a current inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee: Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy |