Information between 9th July 2026 - 28th August 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 38 Noes - 133 |
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 118 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 138 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 239 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 202 |
|
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 188 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 154 |
|
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 171 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Berkeley speeches from: Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL]
Lord Berkeley contributed 3 speeches (480 words) Report stage Monday 13th July 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Crown Lands and Estates
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 9th July 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government how much of the £487 million transferred from the Crown Estate to the Consolidated Fund in 2025–26 was subsequently allocated for use by the Royal Family. Answered by Lord Livermore The Crown Estate’s revenue account profit is paid in full to the Consolidated Fund. In exchange, the Government provides the Sovereign Grant to support the Monarch’s official business. The Grant does not provide an income to any member of the royal family.
As set out in the Sovereign Grant Review published on 25 June 2026, the Royal Trustees have determined that a reference rate of 20.5 per cent is appropriate for the funding formula from 2027-28 onwards, which equates to a 2027-28 Grant amount of £99.9 million, a reduction against the £137.9 million in 2026-27.
As the Sovereign Grant Act 2011 currently restricts the Grant amount from being set lower than the preceding year’s amount, the Government has committed to bring forward legislation to enable the Grant for 2027-28 to be set at this lower amount, to reflect the adjustment now that the temporary additional funding for Buckingham Palace Reservicing is no longer needed. |
|
House of Lords: Fire Prevention
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 14th July 2026 Question To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker, in respect of the evacuation of the House of Lords at 15:00pm on Thursday 2 July, (1) to what extent, if any, were members and staff of the House of Commons involved, (2) to what extent was the London Fire Brigade informed and involved, and (3) how long did the evacuation take, from the time of sounding the alarm to the last person leaving the building. Answered by Lord McLoughlin The Senior Deputy Speaker has asked me, as Chair of the Services Committee, to respond on his behalf. The House of Commons was fully involved in the evacuation drill. For the purposes of evacuation, the Parliamentary Estate is treated as a single zone. Accordingly, the House of Commons Chamber was also evacuated during a debate. The London Fire Brigade was informed in advance of the exercise. Its control room was notified and remained in contact throughout the drill. The local Borough Commander and the Station Commander from Soho were also informed. A representative from the London Fire Brigade's Risk Management Team attended and observed the exercise in order to provide feedback. In addition, the Chief Inspector from the Crown Premises Fire Safety Inspectorate attended to observe the evacuation. The evacuation took a total of 15 minutes from commencement of the exercise until all members of the public and staff, excluding security personnel and designated observers, had left the building. |
|
Driving: Disqualification
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Friday 24th July 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government, for each of the last five calendar years, how many appeals have been made against magistrates' court decisions which have rejected defendants' claims of exceptional hardship in proceedings concerning drivers liable to disqualification under the totting-up provisions; and how many of those appeals were successful. Answered by Lord Lemos - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) The Ministry of Justice publishes quarterly data on appeals against magistrates’ court decisions heard in the Crown Court in the Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly release which can be downloaded from the Criminal Court Statistics landing page here: Criminal court statistics - GOV.UK. Table C11 provides details of appeals heard at the Crown Court.
However, data is not centrally recorded on the specific grounds of appeal, including whether an appeal relates to the rejection of an exceptional hardship argument in proceedings concerning drivers liable to disqualification under the totting-up provisions.
This information may be contained within individual court records. However, identifying and reviewing relevant cases would require a manual examination of those records and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Jul 2026, 10:04 p.m. - House of Lords "But I think what Lord Berkeley has said that we need to seriously look " Baroness Foster of Oxton (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Jul 2026, 10:05 p.m. - House of Lords "We do not support the amendment. >> Well, I thank the noble Lord Berkeley and the noble Lord Davis of Gower for this amendment. The " Lord Moylan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Jul 2026, 12:10 p.m. - Science and Technology Committee "Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Jul 2026, 3:49 p.m. - House of Lords " My Lords, my Lords, perhaps the most intractable problem is that of work for artists in Europe, whether work for artists in Europe, whether temporary or permanent, affecting, as Lord Berkeley says, not just musicians, but dancers and actors " The Earl of Clancarty (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Jul 2026, 3:41 p.m. - House of Lords " Second, Oral Question Lord Berkeley of Knighton. >> My Lords, I beg leave to ask the question standing in my name on the Order Paper. " Lord Berkeley of Knighton (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Performing Artists and Musicians: Access to the EU
24 speeches (1,431 words) Wednesday 22nd July 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Earl of Clancarty (XB - Life peer) As the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, said, this is affecting not just musicians but dancers and actors, - Link to Speech |
|
Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL]
163 speeches (35,189 words) Report stage Monday 13th July 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Baroness Foster of Oxton (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I support this amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, co-signed by the noble Lord, Lord - Link to Speech 2: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) I thank my noble friend Lord Berkeley and the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Gower, for this amendment. - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 21st July 2026
Government Response - National Policy Statement for Ports: Government response to the Transport Committee and Consultation Transport Committee Found: stated that, “ports should be given a major role in telling everyone what their forecast is” (Lord Berkeley |
|
Tuesday 21st July 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 8th meeting 14 June 2026 Science and Technology Committee Found: TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE M inutes of the 8th Meeting, held at 10am on Tuesday, 14 July 2026 P resent: Lord Berkeley |
|
Tuesday 14th July 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 7th meeting 7 July 2026 Science and Technology Committee Found: TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE M inutes of the 7th Meeting, held at 10am on Tuesday, 7 July 2026 P resent: Lord Berkeley |
|
Tuesday 14th July 2026
Oral Evidence - UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Science and Technology Committee Found: Innovation Tuesday 14 July 2026 10.20 am Watch the meeting Members present: Lord Mair (The Chair); Lord Berkeley |
|
Tuesday 7th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), and Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) Innovation in the NHS: Personalised Medicine and AI - Science and Technology Committee Found: and AI Tuesday 7 July 2026 10.15 am Watch the meeting Members present: Lord Mair (The Chair); Lord Berkeley |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Tuesday 4th August 2026
Department for Transport Source Page: National Policy Statement for Ports: Response to the Transport Committee and to consultation. Incl. Appendices. 36p. Document: Response_to_the_Transport_Committee_Consultation_Elay.pdf (PDF) Found: stated that, “ports should be given a major role in telling everyone what their forecast is” (Lord Berkeley |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 1st September 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 15th September 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 8th September 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) At 10:15am: Oral evidence Kathleen Fisher - Chief Executive Officer at Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) View calendar - Add to calendar |