Information between 11th March 2024 - 10th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Calendar |
---|
Friday 10th May 2024 Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative - Life peer) Legislation - Main Chamber Subject: Pet Abduction Bill - second reading Pet Abduction Bill 2023-24 View calendar |
Division Votes |
---|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 180 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 178 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 178 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 180 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 175 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187 |
13 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 154 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 201 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 205 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 196 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 208 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 203 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Black of Brentwood voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 200 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Black of Brentwood speeches from: Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
Lord Black of Brentwood contributed 1 speech (350 words) Committee stage Monday 25th March 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
Lord Black of Brentwood speeches from: Independent Schools
Lord Black of Brentwood contributed 3 speeches (224 words) Monday 18th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Education |
Lord Black of Brentwood speeches from: Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
Lord Black of Brentwood contributed 1 speech (293 words) Report stage Wednesday 13th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
Lord Black of Brentwood speeches from: Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
Lord Black of Brentwood contributed 2 speeches (1,940 words) Report stage Monday 11th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
Written Answers |
---|
BBC: Advertising
Asked by: Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd April 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the BBC’s plans to introduce advertising on podcasts and on-demand content via third-party services; and whether the plans are compatible with the Royal Charter and Agreement. Answered by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The BBC has responsibilities set out in its Royal Charter to avoid unnecessary adverse impacts on the market. As the BBC’s independent regulator, it is for Ofcom to hold the BBC to account in meeting its obligations both to its audiences and to the market, as set out in the Royal Charter and Framework Agreement. The Government’s recent Mid-Term Review of the BBC stresses the need for the BBC meaningfully to engage with its competitors, and for high standards of transparency. Our recommendations seek to secure more effective engagement between competitors, the BBC and Ofcom on competition and market issues, enabling the BBC and Ofcom to make more informed decisions about changes which may affect the BBC’s competitors, and to ensure that the BBC’s competitors are better able to inform those decisions. The Government will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the reforms as we approach the renewal of the BBC’s Royal Charter. We will examine the BBC’s role in the wider market, including how the regulatory framework may need to evolve to reflect shifts in technology and consumer behaviour, as part of our work in the next Charter Review. In the meantime, the BBC must rise to the challenge and make sure to strike the correct balance between its obligations. |
BBC: Advertising
Asked by: Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd April 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the BBC’s initiatives to engage with competitors on their plans to introduce advertising on podcasts and on-demand content via third-party services. Answered by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The BBC has responsibilities set out in its Royal Charter to avoid unnecessary adverse impacts on the market. As the BBC’s independent regulator, it is for Ofcom to hold the BBC to account in meeting its obligations both to its audiences and to the market, as set out in the Royal Charter and Framework Agreement. The Government’s recent Mid-Term Review of the BBC stresses the need for the BBC meaningfully to engage with its competitors, and for high standards of transparency. Our recommendations seek to secure more effective engagement between competitors, the BBC and Ofcom on competition and market issues, enabling the BBC and Ofcom to make more informed decisions about changes which may affect the BBC’s competitors, and to ensure that the BBC’s competitors are better able to inform those decisions. The Government will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the reforms as we approach the renewal of the BBC’s Royal Charter. We will examine the BBC’s role in the wider market, including how the regulatory framework may need to evolve to reflect shifts in technology and consumer behaviour, as part of our work in the next Charter Review. In the meantime, the BBC must rise to the challenge and make sure to strike the correct balance between its obligations. |
BBC: Advertising
Asked by: Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd April 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to (1) the BBC Mid Term Review 2024, published on 22 January, and (2) the BBC’s plans to introduce advertising on podcasts and on-demand content via third-party services, what steps they are taking to ensure that Ofcom’s regulation of the BBC ensures the Corporation does not unduly harm the commercial sector. Answered by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The BBC has responsibilities set out in its Royal Charter to avoid unnecessary adverse impacts on the market. As the BBC’s independent regulator, it is for Ofcom to hold the BBC to account in meeting its obligations both to its audiences and to the market, as set out in the Royal Charter and Framework Agreement. The Government’s recent Mid-Term Review of the BBC stresses the need for the BBC meaningfully to engage with its competitors, and for high standards of transparency. Our recommendations seek to secure more effective engagement between competitors, the BBC and Ofcom on competition and market issues, enabling the BBC and Ofcom to make more informed decisions about changes which may affect the BBC’s competitors, and to ensure that the BBC’s competitors are better able to inform those decisions. The Government will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the reforms as we approach the renewal of the BBC’s Royal Charter. We will examine the BBC’s role in the wider market, including how the regulatory framework may need to evolve to reflect shifts in technology and consumer behaviour, as part of our work in the next Charter Review. In the meantime, the BBC must rise to the challenge and make sure to strike the correct balance between its obligations. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
36 speeches (8,195 words) 3rd reading Tuesday 26th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Lord Offord of Garvel (Con - Life peer) I thank my noble friends Lord Black of Brentwood and Lord Lucas for their engagement and collaboration - Link to Speech |
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
121 speeches (23,637 words) Report stage Monday 11th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) the exemption will be tested, no matter the wording.Finally, Amendment 34, tabled by my noble friend Lord - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 25 2024
HL Bill 30-III Third marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: BARONESS KIDRON LORD BLACK OF BRENTWOOD LORD CLEMENT-JONES BARONESS JONES OF WHITCHURCH 103 |
Mar. 25 2024
HL Bill 30-III Third marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: BARONESS KIDRON LORD BLACK OF BRENTWOOD LORD CLEMENT-JONES BARONESS JONES OF WHITCHURCH 103 |
Mar. 21 2024
HL Bill 30-II Second marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: LORD CLEMENT-JONES BARONESS HARDING OF WINSCOMBE BARONESS JONES OF WHITCHURCH LORD BLACK OF |
Mar. 18 2024
HL Bill 30-I Marshalled list for Grand Committee Data Protection and Digital Information Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: LORD CLEMENT-JONES BARONESS HARDING OF WINSCOMBE BARONESS JONES OF WHITCHURCH LORD BLACK OF |
Mar. 11 2024
HL Bill 47-II Second marshalled list for Report Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill 2022-23 Amendment Paper Found: and Consumers Bill 22 Clause 258 LORD LUCAS BARONESS JONES OF WHITCHURCH LORD CLEMENT-JONES LORD |