Information between 4th January 2026 - 14th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 37 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 47 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Clement-Jones speeches from: AI Systems: Risks
Lord Clement-Jones contributed 2 speeches (545 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Grand Committee |
|
Lord Clement-Jones speeches from: Computer-generated Child Sexual Abuse Material
Lord Clement-Jones contributed 1 speech (64 words) Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Clement-Jones speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Clement-Jones contributed 10 speeches (2,881 words) Committee stage part one Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Clement-Jones speeches from: Government Communications: X
Lord Clement-Jones contributed 1 speech (85 words) Monday 5th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Data Protection: Public Bodies
Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 5th January 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government (1) which public bodies are subject to the data sharing agreement under the Digital Economy Act 2017, (2) which public bodies have received data under the Digital Economy Act 2017, and (3) what checks they have performed on the accuracy of the entries added to the register of information sharing agreements. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Digital Economy Act 2017 (DEA) contains data sharing powers that allow specified authorities to share information, including personal data, for specific purposes. Anyone sharing information under Chapters 1- 4 of Part 5 of the DEA is required to have regard to the relevant Code of Practice when doing so. This states that those authorities, listed in schedules 4-8 and Chapter 2 of the DEA, should enter an information sharing agreement (ISA) when sharing data under these powers. The codes of practice provide details to practitioners on how information sharing powers under the DEA must be operated. Those relating to public service delivery (PSD), debt and fraud and civil registration place a requirement on the Data Controller(s) to set out information about their ISA within a publicly available register. The register, operated by Government Digital Service (GDS) and publicly available on GOV.UK, provides a central repository of all data shares made under the powers provided by Chapters 1 - 4 of Part 5 of the DEA. It is a key transparency measure which outlines details of each data share, including the bodies involved, why it is shared, for how long and the expected benefits. The register currently contains 525 entries and 464 public bodies. It is available at https://www.digital-economy-act-register.data.gov.uk. While GDS is responsible for maintaining the register, the DEA’s statutory Code of Practice makes clear that responsibility for the accuracy of register entries rests with the public authorities involved in each data share, except in relation to the debt and fraud provisions, where responsibility falls under the debt and fraud secretariat. |
|
Music Venues: Business Rates
Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 7th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of increased business rates on grassroots music venues; and what steps they intend to take in response to the open letter sent to the Prime Minister by the Music Venue Trust on 10 December. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) At the Budget, the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation. Music venues are valued in the same way as any other class of non-domestic property, through applying the statutory and common law principles that apply across non-domestic rating.
Some properties, including in the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors, have seen their rateable values increased. This is in part because the last revaluation updated rateable values to align with market values at 1 April 2021 – during the COVID pandemic. This meant rateable values were lower due to the atypical economic situation the pandemic created. This latest revaluation reflects a post Covid world, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties.
To support with bill increases, at the Budget, the Government introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion over the next three years to protect ratepayers seeing their bills increase because of the revaluation. As a result, over half of ratepayers will see no bill increases, including 23% seeing their bills go down. Government support also means that most properties seeing increases will see them capped at 15% or less next year, or £800 for the smallest.
|
|
Music Venues: Valuation
Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 7th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the Valuation Office Agency about valuations of grassroots music venues. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) At the Budget, the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) announced updated property values from the 2026 revaluation. Music venues are valued in the same way as any other class of non-domestic property, through applying the statutory and common law principles that apply across non-domestic rating.
Some properties, including in the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors, have seen their rateable values increased. This is in part because the last revaluation updated rateable values to align with market values at 1 April 2021 – during the COVID pandemic. This meant rateable values were lower due to the atypical economic situation the pandemic created. This latest revaluation reflects a post Covid world, which has led to significant increases in rateable values for some properties.
To support with bill increases, at the Budget, the Government introduced a support package worth £4.3 billion over the next three years to protect ratepayers seeing their bills increase because of the revaluation. As a result, over half of ratepayers will see no bill increases, including 23% seeing their bills go down. Government support also means that most properties seeing increases will see them capped at 15% or less next year, or £800 for the smallest.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:50 p.m. - House of Lords "my friend Lord Clement-Jones, who perfectly and indeed proportionately set out the principles in this amendment which " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:52 p.m. - House of Lords "digital ID is critical. Lord Clement-Jones effectively set out the provisions of this amendment. I " Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:55 p.m. - House of Lords "Europe on this subject. Could I suggest that he and the noble Lord Clement-Jones did, together with " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:58 p.m. - House of Lords "with Lord Clement-Jones as the thrust of the amendment, although I " Lord Fuller (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:57 p.m. - House of Lords "timely than Lord Clement-Jones anticipated, because today the government has announced the " Lord Fuller (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:57 p.m. - House of Lords "laid by the noble Lord Clement-jones. And it's a very timely amendment, possibly more " Lord Fuller (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:59 p.m. - House of Lords "report. I hope the Minister is prepared to meet with Lord Clement-Jones and others to get this principle, so that the " Lord Fuller (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 5:59 p.m. - House of Lords " My Lords, I thank the noble Lord Lord Clement-Jones for tabling this Lord Clement-Jones for tabling this amendment, and I know that the creation of a specific identity offence has been a long standing " Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 6:03 p.m. - House of Lords "matter. The noble Lord Clement-jones asked me whether I would read out a number of " Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 6:27 p.m. - House of Lords "put forward by our noble Lord Lord Clement-Jones and also my noble friend, Lord, Lord Holmes. They are " Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 6:29 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Lord Clement-Jones and my noble friend Lord Holmes of Richmond for tabling the amendments " Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 6:33 p.m. - House of Lords " Once again, I'm grateful to the noble Lord Clement-Jones and indeed, with support from the noble Lord " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 7:13 p.m. - House of Lords "of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-jones not a conservative, but my partner. Over the last decade in the defence of " Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 7:25 p.m. - House of Lords "grateful that Lord Clement-jones intervened, because probably people might have forgotten some of the points you've made. And if I amplify them too much, I'm sure " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 7:25 p.m. - House of Lords "ably explained by Baroness Neville-rolfe, and I may cover some of the same ground. I was only grateful that Lord Clement-jones " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
7 Jan 2026, 7:41 p.m. - House of Lords "has been lost or stolen by a registered user. And again, the noble Lord Clement-jones, the noble " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
AI Systems: Risks
32 speeches (7,210 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Grand Committee Mentions: 1: Lord Leong (Lab - Life peer) I hope this will be welcomed by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. - Link to Speech |
|
Crime and Policing Bill
96 speeches (28,955 words) Committee stage part one Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Holmes of Richmond (Con - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones effectively set out his amendment, which is proportionate, valid, - Link to Speech 2: Lord Fuller (Con - Life peer) So I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, on the thrust of the amendment, although I accept - Link to Speech 3: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for tabling this amendment. - Link to Speech 4: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) These are caveats I share.The noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, asked whether I would read out a number - Link to Speech 5: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and my noble friend Lord Holmes of Richmond for - Link to Speech |