Joined House of Lords: 12th July 2023
Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Lord Houchen of High Leven, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
Lord Houchen of High Leven has not introduced any legislation before Parliament
Lord Houchen of High Leven has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting
As at 1 July 2026, DCMS has 380 desks with 752 staff members based in London. A 5:10 desk ratio is in line with government standards.
It has been the practice of this and successive governments not to comment, on grounds of both national security and staff safety, on the physical capacity or staffing numbers for individual buildings of the government estate.
The Department for Business and Trade has 1058 desks located within the Old Admiralty Building.
As of the end of June 2026 there are 3,699 civil servants assigned to the Old Admiralty Building.
We want to see more use of UK made steel in public projects, whilst respecting our national and international legal obligations.
To ensure that our steel producers, including British Steel and Tata Steel UK, are in the best position to bid for and win public contracts in that market, our steel Procurement Policy Note, introduced in June, states that all organisations in scope should consult UK Steel’s digital catalogue before making procurement decisions.
More broadly, we also welcome industry led local content targets across all industrial strategy sectors, including clean energy.
We want to see more use of UK made steel in public projects, whilst respecting our national and international legal obligations.
Central government procurers have an excellent record of using UK made steel. In FY 2023/24, where full domestic sourcing was possible, about 97% of the steel (by value) procured was UK made, equivalent to c.£351million. That said, we continue to strengthen mechanisms to enable the procurement of UK made steel. Our steel Procurement Policy Note, introduced in June, states that all organisations in scope should consult UK Steel’s digital catalogue before making procurement decisions.
More broadly, we also welcome industry led local content targets across all industrial strategy sectors, including clean energy.
This government is working towards a financially sustainable future for steelmaking in the UK, and we will set out our long-term vision for the sector in our upcoming Steel Strategy.
We are designing the Steel Strategy to drive growth in the industry, ensuring the sector is competitive and is in line with our national priorities, including increasing the level of domestic demand met by domestic production, to reduce reliance on imports.
On 30 June 2026, 55 Whitehall and 3-8 Whitehall Place had 1104 desk work settings, and 2970 active civil servants as their contracted office location.
55 Whitehall and 3-8 Whitehall Place are two adjacent conjoined buildings that provide the main London office space for the Department.
There are 1,023 desks and a range of shared working spaces available in Sanctuary Buildings. The number of civil servants from the Department for Education assigned to this office is 2,176.
As of 30th June 2026, there are: 1) 1,261 desks; and, 2) 2,180 civil servants assigned to the Department for Transport office at 33 Horseferry Road.
The Department has 2,114 civil servants assigned to 39 Victoria Street. 39 Victoria Street has 882 desks.
HMRC does not routinely collect or publish data on the extent to which Corporation Tax late-payment interest arises from differences between estimated and final tax liabilities, as opposed to late payment behaviour. No specific assessment has therefore been made of the relative contribution of these factors.
Interest on tax paid late is not a penalty but rather designed to both compensate the Exchequer for late payment and to provide a measure of fairness to those taxpayers that pay what is due on time.
The Government recognises that some businesses may face greater uncertainty when estimating their final Corporation Tax liability. The Corporation Tax regime has nevertheless operated successfully for many years using broadly consistent interest rules.
HMRC keeps all aspects of the tax administration framework under review. In doing so, it is mindful of the need to avoid unnecessary complexity and to ensure that rules work effectively across the wide range of businesses that make up the Corporation Tax population. HMRC has not identified evidence that introducing different late-payment interest regimes for particular sectors, activities or business types would improve fairness or deliver better overall outcomes. The Government therefore continues to apply a broadly consistent approach across taxpayers while keeping the operation of the regime under review.
HM Revenue and Customs does not hold a central dataset that identifies how many instances of Late Payment Interest (LPI) have been charged for all tax heads.
For some tax heads, such as Income Tax Self Assessment, it would be possible to produce such figures, but due to the disproportionate cost to the taxpayer, it is not possible to answer this question. This cost represents the time it would take an analyst to extract, combine, analyse and quality assure the data.
For other tax heads, even with additional time and resource, it would not be possible to isolate how many instances of LPI have been charged, due to the way that data is stored for those tax heads.
HM Revenue and Customs does not hold a central dataset that identifies how many instances of Late Payment Interest (LPI) have been charged for all tax heads.
For some tax heads, such as Income Tax Self Assessment, it would be possible to produce such figures, but due to the disproportionate cost to the taxpayer, it is not possible to answer this question. This cost represents the time it would take an analyst to extract, combine, analyse and quality assure the data.
For other tax heads, even with additional time and resource, it would not be possible to isolate how many instances of LPI have been charged, due to the way that data is stored for those tax heads.
As announced at the Budget in 2024, HMRC amended legislation to increase the late payment interest rate by 1.5 percentage points (ppts). This changed interest rates from Bank of England base rate + 2.5 ppts to base rate + 4 ppts.
This change took effect as HMRC’s current interest was low when compared to commercially available short-term borrowing. This creates unfairness between those who pay on time and those who choose not to, using HMRC as a form of cheap lending.
The measure aimed to address this by bringing HMRC’s rates closer to those commercially available. The late payment interest rate increase was made to encourage taxpayers to pay on time, help raise vital revenue for public services, and ensure fairness for those who pay on time.
These changes took effect from 6 April 2025 and are applied where interest is charged to existing and new tax debts owed to HMRC.
This measure encourages people to pay the outstanding tax they owe, increasing incentives to engage with HMRC and make payment arrangements, as well as complying to avoid late payment penalties.
There is no proposal to publish any analysis or evidence as HMRC continues to keep its interest rates under review.
The reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief are forecast to raise a combined £520 million in 2029-30. The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) certified this costing at Autumn Budget 2024 and it does not expect the reforms to have a significant macroeconomic impact. In accordance with standard practice, a tax information and impact note will be published alongside the draft legislation before the relevant Finance Bill.
Information from claims is not recorded to enable regional breakdowns of the number of estates expected to be affected. However, the Government has set out that around 1,500 estates across the UK only claiming business property relief are expected to be affected in 2026-27, with around 1,000 of these expected to only hold shares designated as “not listed” on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, such as the Alternative Investment Market. The remaining 500 estates will include business assets from sectors across the economy that are eligible for business property relief. These reforms mean that around three-quarters of estates claiming business property relief in 2026-27 (excluding those only relating to holding shares designated as “not listed”) will not pay any more inheritance tax in 2026-27.
The Government’s reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief from 6 April 2026 achieve the right balance between supporting businesses, including farms, and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The Government is not removing either agricultural property relief or business property relief. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared to the position before 1992.
The Government has set out that the reforms are expected to result in up to 520 estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim business property relief, in 2026-27 paying more inheritance tax. This means almost three-quarters of estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim for business property relief, would not pay any more tax as a result of the changes in 2026-27, based on the latest available data.
The Government has also set out that around 1,500 estates only claiming business property relief are expected to be affected in 2026-27, with around 1,000 of these expected to only hold shares designated as “not listed” on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, such as the Alternative Investment Market. The remaining 500 estates will include business assets from sectors across the economy that are eligible for business property relief. These reforms mean that around three-quarters of estates claiming business property relief in 2026-27 (excluding those only relating to holding shares designated as “not listed”) will not pay any more inheritance tax in 2026-27.
The reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief are forecast to raise a combined £520 million in 2029-30. The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) certified this costing at Autumn Budget 2024. The OBR published information about the costing in the Economic and Fiscal Outlook on 30 October 2024. The OBR recently published more detail on the costings on 22 January 2025. This material is all available on the OBR’s website.
The Government’s reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief from 6 April 2026 achieve the right balance between supporting businesses, including farms, and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The Government is not removing either agricultural property relief or business property relief. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared to the position before 1992.
The Government has set out that the reforms are expected to result in up to 520 estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim business property relief, in 2026-27 paying more inheritance tax. This means almost three-quarters of estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim for business property relief, would not pay any more tax as a result of the changes in 2026-27, based on the latest available data.
The Government has also set out that around 1,500 estates only claiming business property relief are expected to be affected in 2026-27, with around 1,000 of these expected to only hold shares designated as “not listed” on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, such as the Alternative Investment Market. The remaining 500 estates will include business assets from sectors across the economy that are eligible for business property relief. These reforms mean that around three-quarters of estates claiming business property relief in 2026-27 (excluding those only relating to holding shares designated as “not listed”) will not pay any more inheritance tax in 2026-27.
The reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief are forecast to raise a combined £520 million in 2029-30. The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) certified this costing at Autumn Budget 2024. The OBR published information about the costing in the Economic and Fiscal Outlook on 30 October 2024. The OBR recently published more detail on the costings on 22 January 2025. This material is all available on the OBR’s website.
The Government’s reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief from 6 April 2026 achieve the right balance between supporting businesses, including farms, and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The Government is not removing either agricultural property relief or business property relief. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared to the position before 1992.
The Government has set out that the reforms are expected to result in up to 520 estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim business property relief, in 2026-27 paying more inheritance tax. This means almost three-quarters of estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim for business property relief, would not pay any more tax as a result of the changes in 2026-27, based on the latest available data.
The Government has also set out that around 1,500 estates only claiming business property relief are expected to be affected in 2026-27, with around 1,000 of these expected to only hold shares designated as “not listed” on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, such as the Alternative Investment Market. The remaining 500 estates will include business assets from sectors across the economy that are eligible for business property relief. These reforms mean that around three-quarters of estates claiming business property relief in 2026-27 (excluding those only relating to holding shares designated as “not listed”) will not pay any more inheritance tax in 2026-27.
The reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief are forecast to raise a combined £520 million in 2029-30. The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) certified this costing at Autumn Budget 2024. The OBR published information about the costing in the Economic and Fiscal Outlook on 30 October 2024. The OBR recently published more detail on the costings on 22 January 2025. This material is all available on the OBR’s website.
The Government’s reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief from 6 April 2026 achieve the right balance between supporting businesses, including farms, and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared to the position before 1992.
A technical consultation will be published shortly. As set out at Autumn Budget 2024, the focus of the consultation will be on the detailed application of the £1m allowance to lifetime transfers into trusts and charges on trust property. This will inform the legislation to be included in a future Finance Bill and the Government welcomes engagement on this technical issue. There are no plans to expand the scope of the consultation.
The Government’s reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief from 6 April 2026 achieve the right balance between supporting businesses, including farms, and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared to the position before 1992.
A technical consultation will be published shortly. As set out at Autumn Budget 2024, the focus of the consultation will be on the detailed application of the £1m allowance to lifetime transfers into trusts and charges on trust property. This will inform the legislation to be included in a future Finance Bill and the Government welcomes engagement on this technical issue. There are no plans to expand the scope of the consultation.
The Government’s reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief from 6 April 2026 achieve the right balance between supporting farms and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared to the position before 1992.
These reforms are being introduced in a broader context of significant existing support for the farming industry in the wider tax system, which the Government is maintaining. The existing rules already provide considerable support for the agricultural sector beyond the general support for businesses. This includes the exemption from business rates for agricultural land and buildings, the ongoing entitlement for vehicles and machinery used in agriculture to use rebated diesel and biofuels, and the exemption from the plastic packaging tax for the plastic film used by farmers to produce silage bales. Furthermore, farmers are able to claim to add together their profits from farming for two years or five years and be taxable on the average of those profits.
The Government’s commitment to farmers and the vital role they play in feeding our nation remains steadfast. The Government’s decisions at Autumn Budget 2024 provide £5 billion over two years for farming and land management in England which will restore stability and confidence in the sector, strengthening food security alongside nature’s recovery. This is the largest ever budget directed at sustainable food production and nature’s recovery in our country’s history. Despite the difficult fiscal inheritance, funding has also been prioritised for the Farm Recovery Fund to support farmers with the impact of severe wet weather over the last year.
The Home Office publishes data on people claiming asylum by route of entry to the UK in table Asy_D01a of the 'Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release' on GOV.UK. The latest data relates to the year ending June 2025. Between July 2024 and June 2025, 14,800 asylum claims were submitted by those holding a study visa. There is no breakdown by sponsored or non-sponsored study available. This breakdown is not available from published statistics, and the relevant data could only be collated and verified for the purpose of answering this question at disproportionate cost.
The Home Office requires sponsors to pass an annual Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) to retain their licence. Additionally, sponsor visiting teams carry out audits to ensure sponsors are fulfilling their duties.
As set out in the Immigration White Paper, we are taking action to drive responsible recruitment by tightening the minimum pass requirement of each BCA metric by five percentage points. Further details will be provided in due course.
The Home Office requires sponsors to pass an annual Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) to retain their licence. Additionally, sponsor visiting teams carry out audits to ensure sponsors are fulfilling their duties.
As set out in the Immigration White Paper, we are taking action to drive responsible recruitment by tightening the minimum pass requirement of each BCA metric by five percentage points. Further details will be provided in due course.
The Home Office requires sponsors to pass an annual Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) to retain their licence. Additionally, sponsor visiting teams carry out audits to ensure sponsors are fulfilling their duties.
As set out in the Immigration White Paper, we are taking action to drive responsible recruitment by tightening the minimum pass requirement of each BCA metric by five percentage points. Further details will be provided in due course.
The Government recognises the pressures on prison capacity but can give reassurance that it has not materially affected parole outcomes. As set out in the Parole Board Annual Report, in 2024-25 the Board concluded c.17,000 cases at either paper or oral hearing, compared to c.16,000 in 2023-24. The proportion of cases reviewed where the Board has directed the offender’s release has remained broadly similar for the last few years (since 2021): around 1 in 4 cases result in a release direction. This indicates that the release rate by the Parole Board has remained broadly stable, suggesting that recent prison capacity pressures have not significantly affected it.
Release inaccuracy is yet another symptom of the prison system crisis inherited by this Government. While the overwhelming majority of offenders are released correctly, we are bearing down on those errors that do occur, and this includes releases in error from prisons.
On 11 November, the Deputy Prime Minister announced a five-point action plan setting out initial steps, which includes strengthening release checks across prisons and an independent inquiry, which will report its recommendations to prevent further inaccuracies.
The latest data on releases in error from prisons, which we published exceptionally on 11 November, showed that there have been 91 releases in error from prisons from April 2025 to October 2025. Data on releases is based on the information available at the time. It may be the case in some circumstances that information on a case is brought to light that either confirms or disproves a release in error. Future release in error data will be published in the normal way through our regular statistics and Dame Lynne Owens will be looking at data and transparency as part of her independent investigation.
With the prison system routinely operating at 98% occupancy, central management of population movements is the only practical mechanism to ensure every legally committed prisoner is accommodated appropriately. This includes transferring prisoners from regions with deficits of prison places to regions with relative surpluses.
To put prison capacity on a sustainable footing, the Government launched an Independent Review of Sentencing on 22 October 2024, chaired by former Lord Chancellor, David Gauke. The review was published on 22 May this year and we are accepting, in principle, the following recommendations which will support effective crime prevention and rehabilitation:
Release will be earned – and the most dangerous offenders excluded.
Ramping up tagging and monitoring, with an up to £700 million uplift in annual probation budgets.
Toughening up punishment outside of prison so offenders pay back their debt to society.