Information between 12th October 2025 - 22nd October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 175 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 168 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Jackson of Peterborough speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Jackson of Peterborough contributed 1 speech (786 words) 2nd reading Thursday 16th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Jackson of Peterborough speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Lord Jackson of Peterborough contributed 2 speeches (1,394 words) Committee stage part one Monday 13th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Deputy Prime Minister: Admiralty House
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 13th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have agreed with the former Deputy Prime Minister when she will vacate her residence in Admiralty House. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The former Deputy Prime Minister has vacated the property. The Government agreed the terms of vacation of Admiralty House with the former Deputy Prime Minister in the usual way. |
|
Deputy Prime Minister: Admiralty House
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 13th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 4 August (HL9337), on what date they registered the former Deputy Prime Minister's Admiralty House residence as a second home with Westminster City Council; and whether the Cabinet Office (1) paid a second homes council tax premium, or (2) claimed a job-related second homes council tax discount in respect of that residence. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) As has been the case under successive administrations, the Government Property Agency is responsible for liaising with Westminster City Council on the administration of council tax for Admiralty House. The council tax rate for Admiralty House is determined by Westminster Council; council tax for Admiralty House is properly discharged. |
|
Prime Minister's Chief of Staff: Visits Abroad
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what overseas visits the Prime Minister’s chief of staff has made, without the Prime Minister and at public expense, since being appointed, and at what cost. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Special Adviser travel expenses are not routinely published, as was the case under previous administrations.
|
|
Railways: Crew
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government whether income levels affect socio-economic classifications and, therefore, whether train drivers earning £80,000 per year should be classed as working class under State of the Nation 2024: Local to national, mapping opportunities for all, published by the Social Mobility Commission in September 2024; and what assessment the Office for National Statistics has made of the classification of train drivers under the national statistics socio-economic classifications. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority. Please see the letter attached from the National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority.
Emma Rourke | Acting National Statistician
Lord Jackson of Peterborough House of Lords London SW1A 0PW
30 September 2025
Dear Lord Jackson, As Acting National Statistician, I am responding to your Parliamentary Question asking whether income levels affect socio-economic classifications and, therefore, whether train drivers earning £80,000 per year should be classed as working class under State of the Nation 2024: Local to national, mapping opportunities for all, published by the Social Mobility Commission in September 2024; and what assessment the Office for National Statistics has made of the classification of train drivers under the national statistics socio-economic classifications (HL10733). The Office for National Statistics (ONS) does not incorporate income in the methodology or derivation of the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC). The ONS classifies Train Drivers to the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) 2020 code 8231, which corresponds to " Train and tram drivers”. Under the simplified NS-SEC framework, this occupation is classified as analytic class 5: Lower supervisory and technical occupations. There are 8 analytic classes in the NS-SEC used by the ONS: · Higher managerial, administrative and professional occupation · Lower managerial, administrative and professional occupations · Intermediate occupations · Small employers and own account workers · Lower supervisory and technical occupations · Semi-routine occupations · Routine occupations · Never worked, unemployed, and not elsewhere classified The Social Mobility Commission groups these into 5 categories: ‘higher professional and managerial’, ‘lower professional and managerial’, ‘intermediate’, ‘higher working class’, and ‘lower working class’. Yours sincerely, Emma Rourke
|
|
Senior Civil Servants: Vetting
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what information is passed to the employer once a senior civil servant has undergone developed vetting. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The decision on whether to grant developed vetting will be taken either by United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV), the department or police force that requires the individual to hold clearance, or by the sponsoring authority that carries out this task on behalf of departments. Vetting information required for the decision to be made is strictly controlled and access limited to those directly responsible for the decision reached. Upon successful application for clearance, the sponsor, who is often but not always exclusively within the individual’s employer, is notified.
In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters.
|
|
Lord Mandelson
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, following the letter of 16 September from the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, why the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office was not asked to contribute to the due diligence process on the appointment of Lord Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States; and whether any other bodies were involved in that due diligence process. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Due diligence was undertaken prior to the appointment of the former Ambassador to the United States, and was part of an established process to collate relevant information as part of the identification and selection of the appointee.
Following the announcement of the appointment, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office started the ambassadorial appointment process, including national security vetting, in the usual way.
|
|
Lord Mandelson
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the former Ambassador to the United States, Lord Mandelson, provided advice to the Prime Minister's Office during the Cabinet reshuffle on 5 September. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Prime Minister’s Office did not seek or accept any advice from the former Ambassador in respect of the reshuffle on 5 September.
|
|
Lord Mandelson
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th October 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government for what policy reason, if any, Lord Mandelson was permitted to keep his shareholding in Global Counsel whilst Ambassador to the United States of America. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) We do not comment on the finances of individual employees. |
|
Prime Minister's Chief of Staff: Center for Countering Digital Hate and HOPE not hate
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 15th October 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what meetings the Prime Minister's chief of staff has held with the Center for Countering Digital Hate and Hope not Hate while in post. Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal In line with longstanding process, relevant meetings are declared in the Special Advisor transparency publications. The Prime Minister’s chief of staff has not held meetings with the Center for Countering Digital Hate and Hope not Hate. |
|
USA: Diplomatic Service
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how much they spent on fixtures, fittings, or refurbishment of the Ambassador's residence in Washington DC during Lord Mandelson's tenure as Ambassador. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) Ongoing refurbishment work at our Embassy in Washington DC began in June 2019. The majority of work was completed in 2023, with limited aspects ongoing. |
|
Migrants: Organised Crime
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 26 September (HL10489), why the requested data regarding migrants with suspected links to organised crime groups is not published and collected currently. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Official statistics published by the Home Office are kept under review in line with the code of practice for statistics, taking into account a number of factors including user needs, the resources required to compile the statistics, as well as quality and availability of data. These reviews allow us to balance the production of our regular statistics whilst developing new statistics for future release. |
|
Migrants: Organised Crime
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 26 September (HL10489), for what reason is the data requested not published and collected currently. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Official statistics published by the Home Office are kept under review in line with the code of practice for statistics, taking into account a number of factors including user needs, the resources required to compile the statistics, as well as quality and availability of data. These reviews allow us to balance the production of our regular statistics whilst developing new statistics for future release. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Oct 2025, 11:03 p.m. - House of Lords "thank my supporters in this amendment? Firstly, the noble Lord, Lord folks, Lord Jackson of Peterborough. And Lord Alton of " AMDT: 203F Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Oct 2025, 10:15 p.m. - House of Lords "the noble Lord Lord Cameron and noble Lord Jackson of Peterborough, my Lords, we need to acknowledge in " Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Oct 2025, 9:39 p.m. - House of Lords "Murray Bloodworth, Lord Jackson of Peterborough and Baroness Lawlor. It is a very pertinent amendment. It " Lord Sandhurst (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Oct 2025, 3:43 p.m. - House of Lords ">> My Lords. >> I'm grateful to the clerks, the. >> Whips, and to the noble Lord, Lord Jackson of Peterborough, for allowing me to change my place. " Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Crime and Policing Bill
146 speeches (49,599 words) 2nd reading Thursday 16th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to the clerks, the Whips and the noble Lord, Lord Jackson of Peterborough, for - Link to Speech |
|
Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
89 speeches (22,054 words) Committee stage part two Monday 13th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary) Amendment 203I tabled by my noble friends Lord Murray of Blidworth, Lord Jackson of Peterborough and - Link to Speech 2: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) the amendments in this group in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Cameron and Lord Jackson of Peterborough - Link to Speech 3: Lord Murray of Blidworth (Con - Life peer) First, I thank my supporters in this amendment, the noble Lords, Lord Faulks, Lord Jackson of Peterborough - Link to Speech 4: Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary) Murray of Blidworth for bringing these amendments and to the noble Lords, Lord Faulks, Lord Jackson of Peterborough - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025 3:30 p.m. European Affairs Committee - Private Meeting Subject: The UK-EU reset View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 11th November 2025 3:30 p.m. European Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |