Lord Markham Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Markham

Information between 10th March 2026 - 20th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191


Speeches
Lord Markham speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Lord Markham contributed 5 speeches (391 words)
Committee stage
Friday 13th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice


Written Answers
Fluoride: Water Supply
Asked by: Lord Markham (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 16th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 16 February (HL14539), whether water companies are required to make an active contribution to the protection and improvement of public health.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Water companies have statutory and regulatory duties to protect and improve public health and actively take steps to meet them. These include completion of risk assessments and the sampling of drinking water supplies that may cause the supply not to be wholesome. “Wholesomeness” is defined in the Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2016 as water which does not contain any microorganism, parasite, or substance at a concentration or value which would constitute a potential danger to public health.

Where a water company is also legally required to add fluoride to water supplies to improve public health, it must do so in a way that complies with the Drinking Water Inspectorate’s Code of Practice on Technical Aspects of Fluoridation of Water Supplies 2021.

Protecting and improving public health is also a priority in the Government’s planned reforms for the water sector. A new taskforce, led by the Chief Medical Officer for England, will support the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, providing independent and technical advice on public health risks from water and opportunities to improve water treatment and protection.




Lord Markham mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
195 speeches (43,033 words)
Committee stage
Friday 13th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice
Mentions:
1: Lord Harper (Con - Life peer) reconcile in this legislation.The other very important issue—I am pleased to see my noble friend Lord Markham - Link to Speech