Lord Markham Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Markham

Information between 14th March 2026 - 3rd April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Markham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141


Speeches
Lord Markham speeches from: AI Growth Lab
Lord Markham contributed 1 speech (99 words)
Thursday 26th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Business and Trade


Written Answers
Fluoride: Water Supply
Asked by: Lord Markham (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 16th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 16 February (HL14539), whether water companies are required to make an active contribution to the protection and improvement of public health.

Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Water companies have statutory and regulatory duties to protect and improve public health and actively take steps to meet them. These include completion of risk assessments and the sampling of drinking water supplies that may cause the supply not to be wholesome. “Wholesomeness” is defined in the Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2016 as water which does not contain any microorganism, parasite, or substance at a concentration or value which would constitute a potential danger to public health.

Where a water company is also legally required to add fluoride to water supplies to improve public health, it must do so in a way that complies with the Drinking Water Inspectorate’s Code of Practice on Technical Aspects of Fluoridation of Water Supplies 2021.

Protecting and improving public health is also a priority in the Government’s planned reforms for the water sector. A new taskforce, led by the Chief Medical Officer for England, will support the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, providing independent and technical advice on public health risks from water and opportunities to improve water treatment and protection.