Lord Moylan - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Moylan

Information between 10th November 2025 - 20th November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Moylan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150

Speeches
Lord Moylan speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill Lord Moylan contributed 6 speeches (1,437 words) Committee stage Monday 17th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care
Lord Moylan speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill Lord Moylan contributed 8 speeches (2,292 words) Committee stage Thursday 13th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care
Lord Moylan speeches from: Sentencing Bill Lord Moylan contributed 1 speech (932 words) 2nd reading Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice
Lord Moylan speeches from: Airport Expansion Lord Moylan contributed 1 speech (83 words) Tuesday 11th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport
Lord Moylan speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill Lord Moylan contributed 2 speeches (481 words) Committee stage Tuesday 11th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care
Lord Moylan speeches from: Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Definition of Relevant Land) (Amendment) Order 2025 Lord Moylan contributed 1 speech (666 words) Monday 10th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department for Transport

Written Answers
Software: National Security Asked by: Lord Moylan (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the legal implications of the Podchasov v Russia European Court of Human Rights judgment; and what assessment they have made of the risk that Ofcom's power to issue Technology Notices under section 121 of the Online Safety Act 2023 could create vulnerabilities exploitable by hostile states. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The impugned legislation in Podchasov v. Russia is not directly comparable to the Online Safety Act, which contains robust protections for privacy and freedom of expression. A memorandum on ECHR compatibility was published during Bill passage. Section 121 of the Act contains stringent safeguards ensuring that Ofcom’s power to issue Technology Notices, including relating to child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) content communicated privately, can only be used when necessary and proportionate. Ofcom must consider a range of matters, including whether there are less intrusive alternatives, the harm to individuals and the required technology’s ability to achieve the purpose described.

Written Answers

Software: National Security
Asked by: Lord Moylan (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 18th November 2025

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the legal implications of the Podchasov v Russia European Court of Human Rights judgment; and what assessment they have made of the risk that Ofcom's power to issue Technology Notices under section 121 of the Online Safety Act 2023 could create vulnerabilities exploitable by hostile states.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The impugned legislation in Podchasov v. Russia is not directly comparable to the Online Safety Act, which contains robust protections for privacy and freedom of expression. A memorandum on ECHR compatibility was published during Bill passage.

Section 121 of the Act contains stringent safeguards ensuring that Ofcom’s power to issue Technology Notices, including relating to child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) content communicated privately, can only be used when necessary and proportionate. Ofcom must consider a range of matters, including whether there are less intrusive alternatives, the harm to individuals and the required technology’s ability to achieve the purpose described.

Lord Moylan mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
12 Nov 2025, 6:45 p.m. - House of Lords "overview of IPV in this potential way forward was tremendous. My noble friend Lord Moylan and " Lord Woodley (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
12 Nov 2025, 7:51 p.m. - House of Lords "my Lords. >> I'm not a lawyer. Rather like Lord Moylan. >> But. >> I have retained. " Lord Berkeley of Knighton (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript
12 Nov 2025, 8:06 p.m. - House of Lords "Viscount Hailsham Lord Moylan, Lord Woolley, Baroness Maclean, Lord Berkeley of Knighton and others. " Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
12 Nov 2025, 6:20 p.m. - House of Lords " noble Lord Lord Moylan, who I think makes some very important " Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
20 Nov 2025, 2:56 p.m. - House of Lords "aircraft and then lastly the noble Lord Moylan for whom I have huge " Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript

Parliamentary Debates
Tobacco and Vapes Bill 76 speeches (19,161 words) Committee stage Monday 17th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Lord Johnson of Lainston (Con - Life peer) have a proper consultation to work out how they can ensure we do not end up, as my noble friend Lord Moylan - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer) amendments, I am afraid.I want to make a couple of comments on the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Moylan - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Merron (Lab - Life peer) her question—we do not plan to include them in a consultation.The noble Lords, Lord Johnson and Lord Moylan - Link to Speech 4: Earl Howe (Con - Excepted Hereditary) As my noble friend Lord Moylan has asked in his Amendment 170, why prohibit such specialist shops providing - Link to Speech 5: Baroness Merron (Lab - Life peer) This was spoken to by not only the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, but the noble Lord, Lord Johnson, and the - Link to Speech
Tobacco and Vapes Bill 90 speeches (22,061 words) Committee stage Thursday 13th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: None My noble friend Lord Moylan hit on a very subtle but important point in the psychology that surrounds - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Walmsley (LD - Life peer) My Lords, I shall say a few words in support of Amendment 147 from the noble Lord, Lord Moylan. - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Merron (Lab - Life peer) I thank the noble Lords, Lord Lansley and Lord Moylan, for tabling these amendments, and other noble - Link to Speech 4: None The amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, aims to allow the Government to set aside their - Link to Speech 5: None The noble Lord, Lord Moylan, asked why Ministers abide by the FCTC if it is not law. - Link to Speech
Sentencing Bill 54 speeches (34,383 words) 2nd reading Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Lord Foster of Bath (LD - Life peer) My Lords, I am delighted to follow the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, who makes some very important points.I - Link to Speech 2: Lord Woodley (Lab - Life peer) As always on this subject, the contributions from the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, and the noble Baroness - Link to Speech 3: Lord Berkeley of Knighton (XB - Life peer) It is quite an interesting thought.I am not a lawyer, rather like the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, but I - Link to Speech 4: Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (LD - Life peer) agree with the tenor of speeches on IPPs from the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham, the noble Lords, Lord Moylan - Link to Speech
Planning and Infrastructure Bill 18 speeches (3,370 words) 3rd reading Monday 10th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: None In particular, I put on record my thanks to my noble friends Lord Jamieson, Lord Moylan, Lord Blencathra - Link to Speech
Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Definition of Relevant Land) (Amendment) Order 2025 7 speeches (1,956 words) Monday 10th November 2025 - Grand Committee Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) In answer to both the noble Baroness and the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, that is to avoid duplicate signage - Link to Speech 2: None The noble Lord, Lord Moylan, referred to the Railways Bill and the creation of Great British Railways - Link to Speech