Information between 21st April 2026 - 1st May 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 17 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 14 Crossbench No votes vs 6 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 15 Crossbench No votes vs 16 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 12 Crossbench No votes vs 8 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 12 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 141 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 14 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 3 Crossbench No votes vs 6 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 2 Crossbench No votes vs 7 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 138 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 5 Crossbench No votes vs 1 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 3 Crossbench No votes vs 9 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted Aye and in line with the House One of 52 Crossbench Aye votes vs 7 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted Aye and in line with the House One of 8 Crossbench Aye votes vs 0 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 129 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 22 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 181 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025
Lord Pannick contributed 1 speech (62 words) Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Student Visas
Lord Pannick contributed 1 speech (37 words) Monday 27th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Pannick contributed 1 speech (189 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Monday 27th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Antisemitic Attacks
Lord Pannick contributed 1 speech (88 words) Monday 27th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Lord Pannick contributed 2 speeches (292 words) Committee stage Friday 24th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
24 Apr 2026, 1:08 p.m. - House of Lords "problem that the noble Lord Lord Pannick has raised. The problem is " Lord Deben (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Apr 2026, 1:13 p.m. - House of Lords "that this isn't a passing issue that can be discussed easily. And when the noble Lord Lord Pannick " Lord Deben (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Apr 2026, 2 p.m. - House of Lords "repetitious or unusual in length. We heard from Lord Pannick before that charge, but we haven't heard any specifics on which ones are " Baroness Berger (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Apr 2026, 3:06 p.m. - House of Lords "the noble Lord Pannick referred to several things in there. And of course, I do know that the noble " Baroness Coffey (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
27 Apr 2026, 3:41 p.m. - House of Lords "The noble Lord Pannick has just said a moment ago that the Prime " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
27 Apr 2026, 3:43 p.m. - House of Lords "give the government the opportunity to fulfil that, because, as the noble Lord Pannick has said, we " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Crime and Policing Bill
19 speeches (3,342 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Monday 27th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) I point to what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has just said: the Prime Minister said last week that the - Link to Speech 2: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) of Gower, will give the Government the opportunity to fulfil that, because, as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick - Link to Speech |
|
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
155 speeches (33,958 words) Committee stage Friday 24th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Baroness O'Loan (XB - Life peer) The noble Lords, Lord Birt and Lord Pannick, tabled 35 amendments jointly. - Link to Speech 2: Lord Deben (Con - Life peer) The problem is not the problem that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has raised; the problem is the nature - Link to Speech 3: Lord Deben (Con - Life peer) all accept that this is not a passing issue that can be discussed easily.When the noble Lord, Lord Pannick - Link to Speech 4: None We heard that charge from the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, but we have not heard any specifics on which - Link to Speech 5: Baroness Coffey (Con - Life peer) I am conscious that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, referred to several things in that report, and I know - Link to Speech |