Information between 11th March 2025 - 20th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 7 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 156 |
|
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 18 Crossbench No votes vs 19 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 162 |
|
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 17 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172 |
|
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 13 Crossbench No votes vs 20 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 151 |
|
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 22 Crossbench No votes vs 19 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 14 Crossbench No votes vs 26 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 13 Crossbench No votes vs 30 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 14 Crossbench No votes vs 31 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 173 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 20 Crossbench No votes vs 15 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and against the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 25 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 24 Crossbench No votes vs 3 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 31 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 17 Crossbench No votes vs 15 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted Aye and against the House One of 17 Crossbench Aye votes vs 6 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted Aye and against the House One of 15 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 10 Crossbench No votes vs 2 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 168 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 35 Crossbench No votes vs 13 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 29 Crossbench No votes vs 4 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 257 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 19 Crossbench No votes vs 8 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Pannick voted No and in line with the House One of 4 Crossbench No votes vs 0 Crossbench Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 43 Noes - 120 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Football Governance Bill [HL]
Lord Pannick contributed 1 speech (58 words) 3rd reading Wednesday 26th March 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Gaza: Ceasefire
Lord Pannick contributed 2 speeches (62 words) Tuesday 18th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Football Governance Bill [HL]
Lord Pannick contributed 4 speeches (890 words) Report stage Monday 17th March 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Palestine Statehood (Recognition) Bill [HL]
Lord Pannick contributed 1 speech (438 words) 2nd reading Friday 14th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Football Governance Bill [HL]
Lord Pannick contributed 7 speeches (1,056 words) Report stage part one Tuesday 11th March 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Lord Pannick speeches from: Football Governance Bill [HL]
Lord Pannick contributed 2 speeches (682 words) Report stage part two Tuesday 11th March 2025 - Lords Chamber |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
25 Mar 2025, 4:49 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Pannick was answered by Lord Bach, the Parliamentary Under- Secretary of State for justice. And " Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Mar 2025, 4:03 p.m. - House of Lords "Evans, Lord Monaghan, Lord Jackson of Peterborough, Lord Pannick, consistently raise the importance of having light touch regulation, which " Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Mar 2025, 3:57 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Pannick for their considered engagement. I want to particularly " Baroness Twycross (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Mar 2025, 12:51 p.m. - House of Lords "parents, others burned alive, or raped, as Lord Pannick has indicated the criteria for statehood under international law are clear and for good reason. Statehood is not simply " Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Mar 2025, 1:38 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord, Lord Pannick said, about the conditions needed under international law to create a state. And I have to say, he is a brilliant " Lord Swire (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 5:37 p.m. - House of Lords "context of the discussion with the Lord Pannick, universal, autonomous " Amendment:7 Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 5:59 p.m. - House of Lords "far more work for lawyers in the future than the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, anticipates. His point " Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 8:56 p.m. - House of Lords "for the good and for that reason I am encouraged by Lord Pannick and " Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 8:56 p.m. - House of Lords "touch and I don't think Lord Pannick will tell me it is, but it is positively used in the regulation, not regulatory discussion. I am " Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 9:02 p.m. - House of Lords "will repeat what I've said in earlier debates. I think the government's amendment as a Lord Pannick is a just made clear is " Lord Pannick (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 9:13 p.m. - House of Lords "And it really covered the sentiment. I think we all agree that Lord Pannick and others were trying to do " Lord Markham (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 9:21 p.m. - House of Lords "could get to VER! Amendment 18. Amendment 18, clause 8, page 6, line 9, at the end insert amendment 19 is an amendment to 18, Lord Pannick. " Deputy Lord Speaker. Baroness Newlove (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 9:21 p.m. - House of Lords "name alongside the noble Lords, Lord Burns and Lord Pannick, and the " Deputy Lord Speaker. Baroness Newlove (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 9:21 p.m. - House of Lords "Burns and Lord Pannick, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas. " Deputy Lord Speaker. Baroness Newlove (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 9:23 p.m. - House of Lords "sufficient. Third, Lord Burns, Lord Pannick, and Lord Thomas and I will " Amendment:21 Lord Birt (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:35 p.m. - House of Lords "be published. The letter, as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick pointed " Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:43 p.m. - House of Lords "comments of Lord Pannick made, I was surprised, the lawyer that he is, the expert that he is in football " Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:51 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Pannick, says about the intergenerational of sports lawyers, but I think he will accept that there is plenty in this both sports " Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:51 p.m. - House of Lords "take what the noble Lord Pannick says about... I will in just a second. I say what the noble Lord, " Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:56 p.m. - House of Lords "of the amendments themselves, much as I do not want to see the noble Lord, Lord Pannick lose the opportunity for future litigation, " Baroness Twycross (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 5:46 p.m. - House of Lords " I think, on the same lines as Lord Pannick there on the degree, " - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:06 p.m. - House of Lords "mentioned in it. I thank Lord Pannick for his legal point and I take it on board. I would be happy if the Minister said she would accept just paragraph 1. But I heard " - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:23 p.m. - House of Lords "this right, we do talk later on, and Lord Pannick made the point about wanting to make sure this regulate is light-touch. The government gets " Lord Markham (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2025, 4:25 p.m. - House of Lords "the regulated too far and are potentially over prescriptive, as the noble Lord Lord Pannick expressed in a much more elegant way " Government Spokes. Baroness Twycross (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Mar 2025, 3:32 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lord Pannick has explained, this is a duplication of work which " Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Mar 2025, 3:54 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Pannick as well. As I said previously, the regulator is not " Baroness Twycross (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords]
233 speeches (32,168 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 1st April 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Justin Madders (Lab - Ellesmere Port and Bromborough) As the noble and learned Lord Pannick said in the other place,“the practical reality is that technical - Link to Speech |
|
Football Governance Bill [HL]
10 speeches (2,427 words) 3rd reading Wednesday 26th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Baroness Twycross (Lab - Life peer) light on the good work that clubs do for their local areas.I thank the noble Lords, Lord Birt and Lord Pannick - Link to Speech 2: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) My noble friends Lord Markham and Lord Jackson of Peterborough, along with the noble Lord, Lord Pannick - Link to Speech |
|
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
140 speeches (33,397 words) Committee stage part one Tuesday 25th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House Mentions: 1: Lord Murray of Blidworth (Con - Life peer) answer to that question.The issue was raised again in July 2009 in a question from the noble Lord, Lord Pannick - Link to Speech |
|
Gaza: Ceasefire
35 speeches (2,219 words) Tuesday 18th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Football Governance Bill [HL]
125 speeches (28,323 words) Report stage Monday 17th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab - Life peer) I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Pannick: this is a non-sensible amendment that we should rigorously - Link to Speech 2: Lord Grantchester (Lab - Excepted Hereditary) I also understand the comment from the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, to which I respond merely that if a - Link to Speech 3: Lord Sentamu (XB - Life peer) But I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, that that is not the better way. - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Twycross (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Birt, Lord Pannick and Lord Burns, and the noble and learned - Link to Speech |
|
Palestine Statehood (Recognition) Bill [HL]
68 speeches (19,049 words) 2nd reading Friday 14th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Lord Leigh of Hurley (Con - Life peer) Others were burned alive and innocents were raped.As the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, indicated, the criteria - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Kennedy of Shaws (Lab - Life peer) No court would acknowledge what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has said when all those criteria have been - Link to Speech 3: Lord Verdirame (Non-affiliated - Life peer) I echo in this respect the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, on territory as a requirement for - Link to Speech 4: Lord Swire (Con - Life peer) I listened closely to what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, said about the conditions needed under international - Link to Speech |
|
Football Governance Bill [HL]
121 speeches (26,110 words) Report stage part one Tuesday 11th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord Markham (Con - Life peer) In terms of getting the balance right, though, we shall talk later—the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, made - Link to Speech 2: None Finally, I turn to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. - Link to Speech 3: Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD - Life peer) My Lords, we are on the same lines as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, on the degree. - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer) Therefore, the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, is totally wrong; this is not otiose or unnecessary. - Link to Speech |
|
Football Governance Bill [HL]
55 speeches (12,508 words) Report stage part two Tuesday 11th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab - Life peer) For that reason, while I am encouraged by the amendment of noble Lord, Lord Pannick, the noble Baroness - Link to Speech 2: Lord Birt (XB - Life peer) As the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, made clear, the Government’s amendment is extremely helpful. - Link to Speech 3: Lord Markham (Con - Life peer) They cover the sentiment of what I think we all agree the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and others were trying - Link to Speech 4: Lord Birt (XB - Life peer) As the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has just said, imagine that the backstop is triggered four years after - Link to Speech |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] 2024-25 - CBP-10224
Mar. 27 2025 Found: government would have to “find a better way of proceeding in this vitally important area of law.”230 Lord Pannick |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Mar. 27 2025
Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] 2024-25 Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] 2024-26 Briefing papers Found: government would have to “find a better way of proceeding in this vitally important area of law.”230 Lord Pannick |
|
Mar. 13 2025
HL Bill 59-II Second Marshalled list for Report Football Governance Bill [HL] 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Clause 57 LORD BIRT LORD THOMAS OF CWMGIEDD LORD PANNICK LORD BURNS 58_ Clause 57, page 47, line |