Information between 15th March 2026 - 4th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 23rd April 2026 11 a.m. Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Incentivising investment in and strengthen the long-term competitiveness of the steel sector View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Conservative No votes vs 80 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 7 Conservative No votes vs 96 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 185 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 78 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 6 Conservative No votes vs 40 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 36 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 83 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 37 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 64 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 40 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 132 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 115 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharpe of Epsom voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: UK Steel Strategy
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 1 speech (1,241 words) Monday 23rd March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 4 speeches (809 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Lord Sharpe of Epsom speeches from: UK Domestic Visitor Levy
Lord Sharpe of Epsom contributed 2 speeches (142 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 9 March (HL14773), what assessment they have made of whether the blast furnaces at Scunthorpe steelworks are critical national security assets. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience. Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets. British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards. British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors. |
|
British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, for decommissioning the blast furnaces at the Scunthorpe steelworks; and what estimate they have made of the cost of decommissioning. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience. Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets. British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards. British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors. |
|
British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government how long they plan to fund the operation of the Scunthorpe steelworks; and what is the maximum budget for funding those steelworks. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience. Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets. British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards. British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors. |
|
British Steel: Company Accounts
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government who is responsible for the publication of British Steel's statutory accounts for the year ending 31 December 2024. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience. Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets. British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards. British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors. |
|
British Steel: Scunthorpe
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 9 March (HL14773), whether they will publish a breakdown of the £104 million provided to British Steel for "other operational expenses". Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience. Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets. British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards. British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors. |
|
British Steel: Expenditure
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government who is responsible for non-cash expenditure at British Steel, including carbon obligations under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and UK tax liabilities such as landfill tax. Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has reviewed the role of the Scunthorpe steelworks in contributing to the UK's national security including critical national infrastructure. The Government maintains that securing the continued operation of British Steel's assets is a necessary investment in our national interests and wider economic resilience. Funding for British Steel is subject to the usual government approval processes and ministerial decisions and the need for HMG support is kept under review. All efforts are being made to secure a viable future for the company. All support for British Steel has been drawn from existing HMG budgets. British Steel remains in the ownership of Jingye and estimated costs should the blast furnaces need to be decommissioned is commercially sensitive information. We continue to work with Jingye to find a pragmatic, realistic solution for the future of British Steel. The £104 million detailed for other operational expenses will be reflected in the Department for Business and Trade's accounts for 2025-26. The accounts will be prepared on a basis consistent with government financial reporting standards. British Steel are responsible for ensuring all tax liabilities and obligations pursuant to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme are met. Under the Companies Act 2006, the responsibility to produce accounts belongs to company directors. |
|
Ministry of Defence: Iron and Steel
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 1st April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government how many tonnes of steel procured by the Ministry of Defence in financial years (1) 2023–24, and (2) 2024–25 were (a) produced in the UK, and (b) imported; and, in the case of imported steel, from which countries that steel originated. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The main Defence requirements for steel are generally sourced by our prime contractors. The publication of cross-Government steel data is led by the Department for Business and Trade and is routinely published on gov.uk at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/steel-public-procurement I have attached the tables for 2023 and 2024. The data available shows both the tonnage and origin of steel procured for Ministry of Defence programmes. |
|
Ministry of Defence: Iron and Steel
Asked by: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 1st April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government how many tonnes of steel were procured by the Ministry of Defence in financial years (1) 2023–24, and (2) 2024–25. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The main Defence requirements for steel are generally sourced by our prime contractors. The publication of cross-Government steel data is led by the Department for Business and Trade and is routinely published on gov.uk at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/steel-public-procurement I have attached the tables for 2023 and 2024. The data available shows both the tonnage and origin of steel procured for Ministry of Defence programmes. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Mar 2026, 8:28 p.m. - House of Lords " The question is that this motion be agreed to. Amendment. Lord Sharpe of Epsom. >> I am extremely grateful to the Minister for explaining and " Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Mar 2026, 8:37 p.m. - House of Lords "regulations laid before the House on the 2nd of February be approved. Since when an amendment has been moved by Lord Sharpe of Epsom at " Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Mar 2026, 8:37 p.m. - House of Lords "moved by Lord Sharpe of Epsom at the end to insert the words set out on the Order Paper. The question I therefore have to put is that this " Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Mar 2026, 8:55 p.m. - House of Lords "sympathy with Lord Sharpe of Epsom views on some of this, because " Lord Goddard of Stockport (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
23 Mar 2026, 6:35 p.m. - House of Commons "Lord Sharpe, of Epsom in the other place would have protected our beer gardens from being designated smoke free and would have allowed " Jack Rankin MP (Windsor, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Tobacco and Vapes Bill
51 speeches (11,551 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 23rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Jack Rankin (Con - Windsor) wonder that landlords are barring MPs from their pubs.Amendments tabled in the other place by Lord Sharpe of Epsom - Link to Speech |
|
National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Regulations 2026
18 speeches (5,427 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD - Life peer) I have some sympathy with the views of the noble Lord, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, on some of this. - Link to Speech |