Information between 2nd March 2026 - 12th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 29 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 12 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 13 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 14 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 13 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 38 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 183 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 39 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 6 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Teverson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 38 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 40 Noes - 123 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Teverson speeches from: Energy Markets
Lord Teverson contributed 1 speech (115 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Insecticides: Pets
Asked by: Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 5 February (HL14038), why the potential risks of chronic exposure to users and children is not listed in the Veterinary Medicines Directorate product information database of authorised products. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) When conducting a user risk assessment, before a veterinary medicine is authorised, both the hazards and the likely exposures to humans, including the children in a household, are considered. Data from both acute and chronic toxicology studies using animal models are used to identify the possible negative reactions that may be seen in humans if exposed. Several exposure scenarios are considered, including reasonable worst-case scenarios, leading to a conservative estimate of the actual risks to those that may come into contact with a veterinary medicine. A hazard may be identified, but if the exposure to the medicines is likely to be low, then this leads to minimal risk to the person. If risks are identified, they are listed on the product information database, alongside advice on how to minimise those risks. VMD collects data on adverse reactions reported to them and to pharmaceutical companies, once a product is on the market, and can update the risk profile and user warnings where these data indicate a concern. |
|
Veterinary Services: Insecticides
Asked by: Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 5 February (HL14039), (1) when the regulatory review of the AVM‑GSL status of products containing fipronil and imidacloprid will be completed, and (2) whether input from vets and scientists external to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate will be consulted and contribute to the review. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) is undertaking a review of the AVM‑GSL status of veterinary medicines containing fipronil and imidacloprid, and further details on the review will be published in the coming weeks. A completion date cannot yet be provided as this is dependent on finalising the process and associated milestones.
The review will include a consultative process, drawing on evidence and input from all stakeholders. All decisions will be based on robust scientific assessment, with animal health and welfare remaining paramount throughout the review. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 3rd March 2026
Declarations of interest - All members- Regulators and growth declarations of interest Industry and Regulators Committee Found: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town Interests as set out in the Register of Lords’ Interests Lord Teverson |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Business and Trade, and Department for Business and Trade Regulators and growth - Industry and Regulators Committee Found: Q155 Lord Teverson: Minister, you are the Minister for Small Business. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Regulators and growth At 10:30am: Oral evidence The Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary at HM Treasury Jessica Glover - Director General, growth and productivity at HM Treasury View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 11 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |