Information between 11th November 2025 - 1st December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 309 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Adam Thompson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Adam Thompson speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Adam Thompson contributed 1 speech (65 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Public Buildings: Textiles
Asked by: Adam Thompson (Labour - Erewash) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to help expand the pipeline of qualified floor layers to deliver (a) public housing, (b) hospitals, (c) schools and (d) other infrastructure projects. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Government is investing £625 million in construction skills over this Parliament. This includes Foundation Apprenticeships, expanded Skills Bootcamps, and the launch of Construction Technical Excellence Colleges. These measures aim to deliver up to 60,000 additional skilled workers and support employers to invest in training. The industry-led Construction Skills Mission Board is working to create construction job opportunities to meet the government's announced 159 infrastructure and built environment (1.5 million homes and retrofitting 5 million existing homes) commitments. |
|
Construction: Apprentices
Asked by: Adam Thompson (Labour - Erewash) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps he is taking to ensure that (a) organisations delivering commercial flooring apprenticeships and (b) other independent specialist training providers can access funding and opportunities at parity with large further education colleges delivering for trades. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The funding band of each apprenticeship standard sets out the maximum amount that the government will contribute to the costs of apprenticeship training and assessment. This is irrespective of the type or size of funding provider.
New training providers can enter the apprenticeship training market under one of the three entry routes in place: where there is a legitimate gap in provision that is generated by unmet employer demand, where a levy paying employer wants to become an employer-provider to train its own workforce, or where the provider is in an area we want to grow or where we identify a capacity issue. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Nov 2025, 10:06 a.m. - House of Commons "know why you bother standing about five minutes to go. Adam Thompson. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Much of Erewash is. >> On a floodplain. >> So the flood re scheme is. " Rt Hon Emma Reynolds MP, The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Wycombe, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Nov 2025, 3:53 p.m. - House of Commons ">> It was me that actually asked for the report just to be helpful. Adam Thompson. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I know that my. >> Constituents in. Erewash haven't " Bobby Dean MP (Carshalton and Wallington, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Digital centre of government - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Freddie van Mierlo; Samantha Niblett; Dr Lauren Sullivan; Adam Thompson |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Huma Therapeutics, and Huma Therapeutics Innovation showcase - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: ; Emily Darlington; Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Samantha Niblett; Dr Lauren Sullivan; Adam Thompson |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Innovation showcase At 9:30am: Oral evidence Dr Rebecca Chubb - Deputy Clinical Director at North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust Joe McCrea - Associate Director of Communications at North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust At 9:45am: Oral evidence Dr Manjari Chandran-Ramesh - Partner at Amadeus Capital Partners Jessica Wade - Associate Professor at Imperial College London At 10:30am: Oral evidence Jonathan Legh-Smith - Executive Director at UKQuantum Duncan Jones - General Manager at Quantinuum View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Secretary of State for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology At 9:45am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP - Secretary of State at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Emran Mian - Permanent Secretary at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Digital inclusion and telecoms At 9:30am: Oral evidence Paul Hollingshead - Lead, UK & Europe at Saronic At 9:45am: Oral evidence The Baroness Lloyd of Effra CBE - Minister for Digital Economy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Kevin Adams - Interim Director Digital Infrastructure at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Jenny Hall - Director Digital and Data Policy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
6 Nov 2025
The science and regulation of hair and beauty products and treatments Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Hair and beauty products (chemicals applied to the hair or body for cosmetic purposes) and treatments (cosmetic procedures typically performed by specialists) can cause harm to consumers if they contain unregulated ingredients or if they are improperly administered. The inquiry will respond to recent research which has led to concerns about the current scientific evidence base and regulation for these products, as well as the required training and qualifications of specialists performing treatments. The inquiry will also investigate the growing concern that certain products that are commonly used by marginalised groups, such as creams to ‘relax’ afro-type hair and synthetic hair, can contain harmful chemicals.
|
|
24 Nov 2025
Data security across government Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions On 15 July 2025 the Defence Secretary told the House of Commons about a large-scale data breach that had taken place in 2022, when a Ministry of Defence official emailed a spreadsheet to an external contact, unaware that it contained details relating to 18,700 Afghan nationals applying for relocation. In the wake of this, and other serious public sector data breaches, the committee chair wrote to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, and the Information Commissioner, to find out more about data hygiene and data management practices across government. This led to the publication in August 2025 of an Information Security Review which had been undertaken by the Cabinet Office in 2023 but not published. In August and then October 2025 the government announced further details of their intended response to the Afghan data breach - and others like it – and the subsequent review. On 21 October 2025 the committee questioned the Information Commissioner about his office's response to the February 2022 breach and wider learnings for government information and data security. In February 2026, the committee will question the Security Minister and Minister for Digital Government and Data on how the government has responded to the breach, and implemented the recommendations made in the Information Security Review. |