Information between 28th March 2025 - 17th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 306 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 170 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 62 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 302 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164 |
|
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110 |
|
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Onshore Wind and Solar Generation - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 100 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Driving Licences: Zero Emission Vehicles - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 101 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Energy Conservation - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 349 Noes - 14 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Israeli Settlements: Crimes of Violence
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether he has had discussions with his Israeli counterparts on reported Israeli settler attacks on Masafer Yatta in the West Bank. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The Foreign Secretary continues to raise the rights of Palestinians and the need for Israel to hold settler violence to account in his engagements with Israeli counterparts. and The Foreign Secretary has also met Palestinian community members in the West Bank where he heard how communities are affected. We have always been clear that Israeli settlements are illegal under international law and harm prospects for a two-state solution. We condemn settler violence, and we are clear that the Israeli government must crack down on settler violence, stop settlement expansion and reject annexation of the West Bank. The demolitions of Palestinian homes causes unnecessary extensive suffering to Palestinians. In all but the most exceptional of cases, demolitions by an occupying power are contraryct to international law. Israel must cease its policy of demolitions and provide a clear route to construction for Palestinians in Area C. |
|
Artificial Intelligence: Copyright
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Friday 4th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if he will list the dates of meetings he has held with (a) companies and (b) creators on the potential impact of artificial intelligence on copyright since July 2024. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Ministers and officials have regular meetings with a range of stakeholders about artificial intelligence and copyright. Ministerial meetings and engagements are published through quarterly transparency reports on GOV.UK. |
|
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology: Arts
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Monday 7th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, how many (a) in person and (b) online meetings he has had with organisations representing the creative industries since July 2024. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Ministers and officials have regular meetings with a range of stakeholders about the creative industries. Ministerial meetings and engagements are published through quarterly transparency reports on GOV.UK. |
|
Arts: Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if he will bring forward legislative proposals to ensure that generative AI developers are obliged to disclose the use of creative works in AI training. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government’s consultation on copyright and AI closed on 25 February. This sought views on a proposal to require AI model developers to be more transparent about how they obtain and use copyright works in their training.
Our priority now is to review the evidence from the consultation which will inform the Government response, including any legislative proposals. |
|
Copyright: Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Friday 11th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, when he plans to publish the Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Governance consultation. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government published its consultation on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (AI) on 17 December 2024. This closed on 25 February 2025. The Government’s priority now is to review all responses to the consultation, to help inform its approach to copyright and AI. The Government will continue to engage extensively as it considers next steps, and its proposals will be set out in due course. |
|
Arts: Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Monday 14th April 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of generative artificial intelligence on employment in the creative industries. Answered by Chris Bryant - Minister of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) AI is increasingly being used as a tool in the creative process, from music and film production to publishing, architecture and design. As of September 2024 more than 38% of Creative Industries businesses said they have used AI technologies, with nearly 50% using AI to improve business operations. It may foster innovation and efficiency but may also disrupt the sector.We are working with the creative sector and committed to ensuring our brilliant artists benefit in working with the AI sector to harness the opportunities this technology provides.
|
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Relationship Education in Schools
50 speeches (10,195 words) Tuesday 1st April 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Education Mentions: 1: Joe Morris (Lab - Hexham) Friend the Member for Knowsley (Anneliese Midgley) noted the significance of “Adolescence”, the series - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 30th April 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Sue Ferns - Senior Deputy General Secretary at Prospect Jodie Coe - Director of People and Change at Northern Powergrid At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Leah Robson - Founder at Your Energy Your Way Tom Jarman - Director at Low Carbon Journey View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 7th May 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Tidal power and the Severn At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Sarah Williams-Gardener - Chair at Western Gateway Shaun Gaffey - Senior Planner at RSPB Cymru Dr Athanasios Angeloudis - Reader in Environmental Fluid Mechanics at School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Dr Andrew Garrard CBE - Chair at Severn Estuary Commission Sue Bartlett-Reed - Commissioner at Severn Estuary Commission Chris Mills - Commissioner at Severn Estuary Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
25 Apr 2025
National planning for energy infrastructure Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 12 May 2025) The Government is launching an update to the National Policy Statements for energy infrastructure, which govern development consent for major energy installations. One of the leading aims of the policy update is to give greater clarity about the weight planners should give to competing interests including economic, ecological, energy supply and security, and even aesthetic considerations, which can severely slow or even halt infrastructure planning decisions in their tracks. And time is of the essence: Government's Clean Power 2030 target will require most new electricity transmission and offshore wind projects to secure planning consent by next year, and most large-scale onshore projects will need that consent by 2028. The Government has indicated that it wants to remove planning ‘blocks’ to the infrastructure development needed for its energy, industrial and growth strategies – but will these updates to the National Policy Statements fit the bill? Can they really help balance the thorny issues around the competing, legitimate aims and interests of national energy needs, local communities and the natural environment? A key example is the question of electricity cabling: it can cost up to ten times as much to bury power cables as to run them on pylons overhead. But strong community objections to pylons on mainly aesthetic grounds can hold up the necessary planning consents - time that national energy needs, targets and strategy now do not have. Where should the balance lie? Do the policy statement updates do enough to help planners decide? Alongside the Government’s consultation on the new policy statements the Committee is launching a quick call for evidence, seeking stakeholder views on the impact of the policy changes. Many stakeholders will be making detailed submissions to the Government consultation on the same short timeline: the Committee would welcome submission of the “highlights” or key elements of these more detailed responses to Government, to be considered by the Committee and synthesised into our own recommendations to the Government. On that basis, the Committee is seeking evidence submissions by 5pm on May 12th from all interested stakeholders on any or all of the following areas in the three updated National Policy Statements for energy infrastructure: Overarching National Policy Statement for energy (EN-1) National Policy Statement for renewable energy infrastructure (EN-3) National Policy Statement for electricity networks infrastructure (EN-5) |