Information between 6th September 2025 - 16th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 278 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 327 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 333 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 339 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 319 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 316 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Anneliese Midgley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Anneliese Midgley contributed 1 speech (80 words) Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Internet: Data Protection
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment his Department has made of the level of risk of identity theft in connection with the implementation of the Online Safety Act 2023. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Online Safety Act requires providers to protect users’ right to privacy when implementing age assurance. UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act requires data to be processed fairly, lawfully, and transparently. Where Ofcom is concerned that a provider has not complied it may refer the matter to the ICO. Under the Act, regulated services that are likely to be accessed by children must implement highly effective age assurance to prevent exposure to harmful content. There are cost-effective compliant methods available. Highly effective age assurance must be robust, and services must take appropriate steps to mitigate against circumvention. |
|
IVF: LGBT+ People
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Monday 8th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will bring forward the removal of requirements for same-sex female couples to self-fund intrauterine insemination cycles before becoming eligible for NHS-funded IVF treatment. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government recognises that fertility treatment across the National Health Service in England is subject to variation in access. Work continues between the Department and NHS England to better understand the offer around NHS-funded fertility services including the issue for female same sex couples. Funding decisions for health services in England are made by integrated care boards (ICBs) and are based on the clinical needs of their populations. We expect ICBs to commission fertility services in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which are currently under review and will take into consideration whether the current recommendations for access to fertility guidelines are still appropriate. In the light of broader pressures on the NHS and on ongoing changes within NHS England we have been looking at achievable ambitions to improve access to fertility services and fairness for all affected couples. The Government is committed to prioritising women’s health as we build an NHS fit for the future. Through our 10 Year Health Plan, we are delivering our manifesto commitment that never again will women’s health be neglected. |
|
Fertility: Medical Treatments
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Monday 8th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure that all Integrated Care Boards provide equal access to fertility treatments across England. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government recognises that fertility treatment across the National Health Service in England is subject to variation in access. Work continues between the Department and NHS England to better understand the offer around NHS-funded fertility services including the issue for female same sex couples. Funding decisions for health services in England are made by integrated care boards (ICBs) and are based on the clinical needs of their populations. We expect ICBs to commission fertility services in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which are currently under review and will take into consideration whether the current recommendations for access to fertility guidelines are still appropriate. In the light of broader pressures on the NHS and on ongoing changes within NHS England we have been looking at achievable ambitions to improve access to fertility services and fairness for all affected couples. The Government is committed to prioritising women’s health as we build an NHS fit for the future. Through our 10 Year Health Plan, we are delivering our manifesto commitment that never again will women’s health be neglected. |
|
Health Services: Women
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Monday 8th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what his planned timetable is for (a) removing financial barriers for same-sex couples accessing fertility treatments on the NHS and (b) full implementation of the Women’s Health Strategy. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government recognises that fertility treatment across the National Health Service in England is subject to variation in access. Work continues between the Department and NHS England to better understand the offer around NHS-funded fertility services including the issue for female same sex couples. Funding decisions for health services in England are made by integrated care boards (ICBs) and are based on the clinical needs of their populations. We expect ICBs to commission fertility services in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which are currently under review and will take into consideration whether the current recommendations for access to fertility guidelines are still appropriate. In the light of broader pressures on the NHS and on ongoing changes within NHS England we have been looking at achievable ambitions to improve access to fertility services and fairness for all affected couples. The Government is committed to prioritising women’s health as we build an NHS fit for the future. Through our 10 Year Health Plan, we are delivering our manifesto commitment that never again will women’s health be neglected. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Employment Rights Bill
178 speeches (28,836 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Sep. 15 2025
Committee to draw up Reasons for disagreeing to Lords Amendments - 15 September 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Minutes of Reasons Committee Found: SEPTEMBER 2025 Members present: Peter Kyle, in the Chair Andrew Griffith Gen Kitchen Anneliese Midgley |
| Department Publications - Transparency | |
|---|---|
|
Tuesday 30th September 2025
Department for Business and Trade Source Page: DBT: ministerial overseas travel and meetings, April to June 2025 Document: View online (webpage) Found: | |
|
Tuesday 30th September 2025
Department for Business and Trade Source Page: DBT: ministerial overseas travel and meetings, April to June 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: online marketplaces Justin Madders 28/04/2025 Mayor of Sefton, Sefton Council, Patrick Hurley MP, Anneliese Midgley |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th October 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: State of Play: Elite Deaf Athletes and the Deaflympics At 10:00am: Oral evidence Chris Ratcliffe - Chief Executive at UK Deaf Sport Henry Hughes - Deaflympics Swimmer Nathan Young - Deaflympics Swimmer View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 15th October 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The cost of energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence David Buttress - CEO at OVO Energy Chris Norbury - CEO at E.ON Chris O'Shea - CEO at Centrica Simone Rossi - CEO at EDF UK Andrew Ward - CEO at Scottish Power Customer Business Rachel Fletcher - Director of Regulation and Economics at Octopus Energy View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 22nd October 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Unlocking community energy at scale At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Alex Lockton - CEO at Empowered Dr Calum MacDonald - Development Manager at Point and Sandwick Trust Dr Mairi Brookes - Smart Energy Systems Director at Low Carbon Hub At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Matt Magill - Director of Engineering & Customer Solutions Transformation at National Energy System Operator (NESO) Mark Askew - Head of Connections, Policy and Performance at Southern and Scottish Electricity Networks - Distribution Sarah Jeffery - Head of Community Energy at National Grid Electricity Distribution Finley Becks-Phelps - UK Head of Development at Nadara View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: UK refineries and the role of oil and gas At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Elizabeth de Jong - CEO at Fuels Industry UK Benj Sykes - Head of Ørsted UK at Ørsted UK Paul Greenwood - UK Chair at ExxonMobil At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Stuart Payne - Chief Executive at North Sea Transition Authority Katy Heidenreich - Supply Chain & People Director at Offshore Energies UK Harriet Eisner - Regional Co-Ordinating Officer at Unite View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Protecting built heritage At 10:00am: Oral evidence Eilish McGuinness - Chief Executive at National Lottery Heritage Fund Matthew Mckeague - Chief Executive at Architectural Heritage Fund Geoff Parkin - Interim Chief Executive at English Heritage At 11:00am: Oral evidence Sarah Buckingham - Director of Historic Properties and Environment at Jersey Heritage Paul Crisp - Senior Director and Head of Heritage at Smith Jenkins Planning & Heritage Councillor Julie Jones-Evans - Chair at Local Government Association's Culture, Tourism and Sport Board View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
30 Oct 2025
Managing the future of UK oil and gas Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Following an initial evidence session in Parliament on the role of the UK’s refinery industry in the energy transition, the Committee is launching a new inquiry and call for evidence on the future of UK oil and gas. Data from the oil and gas industry shows that it directly supports around 26,000 jobs across the UK and indirectly supports 95,000 more – through offshore drilling, rigging, catering and scaffolding, and onshore fabrication yards, anchor manufacturing, vessel maintenance and more. There are an estimated, further 84,000 jobs for hospitality workers and taxi drivers that serve these industrial communities. The UK has of course experienced previous energy and industrial transitions with the closure of its coal mines in the 1980s, and more recently the closure of major steel manufacturing works. The harsh experience of deindustrialisation has raised concerns that large, skilled workforces may bear the brunt of moving away from fossil fuels. The successful redeployment of the workforce at the UK’s last coal power plant Ratcliffe may prove difficult to replicate for the sector-wide transition away from oil & gas. Yet a key element in delivering the energy transition will be to ensure that the benefits from existing fossil fuel extraction can be utilised in establishing the industry that will replace it. In the initial session in Parliament on October 29, witnesses from the industry highlighted the need to address the oil and gas industry’s fiscal environment. They reinforced the Scottish Affairs Committee’s conclusion that there needs to be a revision to the Energy Profits Levy where “a lack of clarity on the fiscal regime beyond 2030 has created uncertainty for industry in the North Sea. The Energy Profits Levy at its current rate of 38%, which brings the headline rate of tax to 78%, is seen by many in industry as no longer proportionate”. The Committee also heard a further call to ensure that refineries were included in the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, so they could compete on a level playing field with foreign based competitors in what is a global market. The Committee is now launching a full inquiry into the role of oil and gas in the energy transition, the management of the UK’s North Sea energy basin and how the transition away from gas in home heating might be achieved. It will aim to:
|