Information between 1st March 2026 - 11th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Anneliese Midgley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Anneliese Midgley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Anneliese Midgley contributed 2 speeches (100 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Anneliese Midgley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Anneliese Midgley contributed 2 speeches (106 words) Monday 2nd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Education |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Prostate Cancer: Screening
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing a targeted national screening programme for prostate cancer for men identified as high risk. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is guided by the independent scientific advice of the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC). It is only where the offer to screen provides more good than harm that a screening programme is recommended. The UK NSC makes its recommendations based on internationally recognised criteria and a rigorous evidence review and consultation process. The UK NSC is currently considering the responses to a public consultation on their draft recommendation to: - offer a targeted national prostate cancer screening programme to men with confirmed BRCA1/2 gene variants every two years, from the age 45 years old to age 61 years old; - not recommend population screening; - not recommend targeted screening of black men; - not recommend targeted screening of men with family history; and - collaborate with the Transform trial team to answer outstanding questions on screening effectiveness for black men and men with a family history, as soon as trial data becomes available, and await the results of the study to develop and trial a more accurate test than the prostate specific antigen test alone, to improve the balance of the benefits and harms of screening. The evidence that supports this recommendation can be found on the following link: https://nationalscreening.blog.gov.uk/ The modelling used to arrive at the recommendation included cost benefit analysis. |
|
Prostate Cancer: Screening
Asked by: Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) Tuesday 3rd March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has conducted a cost-benefit analysis of offering routine prostate-specific antigen testing to high-risk groups. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is guided by the independent scientific advice of the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC). It is only where the offer to screen provides more good than harm that a screening programme is recommended. The UK NSC makes its recommendations based on internationally recognised criteria and a rigorous evidence review and consultation process. The UK NSC is currently considering the responses to a public consultation on their draft recommendation to: - offer a targeted national prostate cancer screening programme to men with confirmed BRCA1/2 gene variants every two years, from the age 45 years old to age 61 years old; - not recommend population screening; - not recommend targeted screening of black men; - not recommend targeted screening of men with family history; and - collaborate with the Transform trial team to answer outstanding questions on screening effectiveness for black men and men with a family history, as soon as trial data becomes available, and await the results of the study to develop and trial a more accurate test than the prostate specific antigen test alone, to improve the balance of the benefits and harms of screening. The evidence that supports this recommendation can be found on the following link: https://nationalscreening.blog.gov.uk/ The modelling used to arrive at the recommendation included cost benefit analysis. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
9th March 2026
Anneliese Midgley (Labour - Knowsley) 3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources BPI (British Recorded Music Industry) Ltd - £3,432.00 Source |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
9 Mar 2026, 2:54 p.m. - House of Commons " Anneliese Midgley hay. >> Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Last week I met with Knowsley Chambers and we all welcomed the government's Youth Guarantee. " Anneliese Midgley MP (Knowsley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Department Publications - News and Communications |
|---|
|
Thursday 5th March 2026
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Source Page: 100 schools cutting bills with Great British Energy solar panels Document: 100 schools cutting bills with Great British Energy solar panels (webpage) Found: Liverpool North West Kim Johnson Park Brow Community Primary School L32 6QH Knowsley North West Anneliese Midgley |
| Non-Departmental Publications - News and Communications |
|---|
|
Mar. 05 2026
Great British Energy Source Page: 100 schools cutting bills with Great British Energy solar panels Document: 100 schools cutting bills with Great British Energy solar panels (webpage) News and Communications Found: Liverpool North West Kim Johnson Park Brow Community Primary School L32 6QH Knowsley North West Anneliese Midgley |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 9th March 2026 5 p.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Children's tv and video content At 10:00am: Oral evidence Dr Garth Graham - Head of Health at YouTube Mairi Brewis - Head of Media Co and Responsibility Partnerships at YouTube UK Alex Rawle - Head of Public Policy at YouTube UK View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Review of Arts Council England At 3:00pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Hodge of Barking DBE View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Major events At 10:00am: Oral evidence Rebecca Edser - Head of Events at VisitScotland At 10:45am: Oral evidence Anne Marie Chebib - Chair at United Kingdom Crowd Management Association Ken Scott MBE - Deputy Chief Executive and Head of Inspectorate at Sports Grounds Safety Authority View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
12 Mar 2026
BBC Royal Charter Review Culture, Media and Sport Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 17 Apr 2026) The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is inviting written submissions on the future of the BBC as part of a new inquiry into the Royal Charter Review. The review of the BBC Charter, which sets out how the broadcaster is governed, regulated and funded, takes place about every ten years. The current process started with the launch of the Government’s consultation in December. To help shape the next Charter, which is due to come into effect at the start of 2028, the Committee is now launching an inquiry on the future purpose, governance and funding of the corporation ahead of making its recommendations to the Government. |