Information between 2nd February 2026 - 4th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 107 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 286 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 280 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Christopher Chope contributed 1 speech (38 words) Thursday 12th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address Motion
Christopher Chope contributed 1 speech (75 words) Thursday 12th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: Lord Mandelson
Christopher Chope contributed 16 speeches (1,972 words) Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: US Department of Justice Release of Files
Christopher Chope contributed 1 speech (28 words) Monday 2nd February 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Museums and Galleries: VAT
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the annual cost to the Exchequer is of the exemption from VAT on repairs enjoyed by museums and galleries. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) HMRC does not hold data that specifically relates to the refunds of VAT on repairs enjoyed by museums and galleries. HMRC does not hold information on VAT revenue from specific products or services because businesses are not required to provide figures at a product level on their VAT returns, as this would impose an excessive administrative burden.
|
|
Places of Worship Renewal Fund
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, for what reason the new Places of Worship Renewal Fund is open to applications from places of worship which are not listed; and whether the new Places of Worship Renewal Fund is open to applications from all places of worship irrespective of denomination. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Places of Worship Renewal Fund (PWRF) will only be targeted at listed places of worship. PWRF will be open to applications from all faiths and denominations. Further details regarding the eligibility criteria and application process, will be published in due course.
|
|
Members: Correspondence
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 9th February 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when the Minister plans to respond to the email from the hon. Member for Christchurch dated 26 November 2025 on the use of civil enforcement powers by local authorities. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Following a search, I can confirm that the Department holds no record of receiving this email. If a copy can be forwarded a response will be provided. |
|
Religious Buildings: VAT
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 23rd February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential cost exempting repairs enjoyed by museums and galleries from VAT to include listed places of worship to the Exchequer. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) VAT is a broad-based tax on consumption, and the 20 per cent standard rate applies to most goods and services. Outside of a limited number of VAT reliefs aimed at stimulating the supply of new homes, the standard VAT rate of 20 per cent applies to most construction work.
Some museums and galleries receive VAT refunds on the costs associated with providing free access to their permanent collections, under the museums and galleries VAT Refund Scheme. This includes the refunds of the VAT paid on repairs to the buildings that contain museums/galleries’ permanent collections. Further information about the refund scheme can be found here: VAT Refund Scheme for museums and galleries (VAT Notice 998) - GOV.UK
The Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme, administered by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, provides grants for VAT paid by listed places of worship on their repair and maintenance costs, with the objective of helping to preserve UK heritage. From April 2026, the scheme will be replaced by a Places of Worship Renewal Fund, which will invest £92 million capital funding into listed places of worship. It is designed to ensure that taxpayer funding is targeted more effectively toward the preservation of our heritage assets.
|
|
Immigration: Christchurch
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 23rd February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will reinstate the right to remain of a Christchurch constituent who has been classified as an overstayer pending review of his case, with reference 1212-0001-5632-8110/00. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) We are working with the hon Gentleman’s constituent to resolve the situation and will contact them directly to resolve the situation. |
|
VAT: Fraud
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 23rd February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many UK businesses at the most recent date for which information is available have had their Government Gateway access restricted on the grounds that their accounts may have been compromised by fraudulent attempts to reclaim VAT. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The security of HMRC’s online services is a top priority. We are aware of attempts by organised criminals to access VAT accounts using genuine customers’ registration details, and our immediate focus is to protect customer data and correct any affected tax or payment records. Customer accounts may be restricted, i.e. suspended or deleted, for a range of reasons, including proactive fraud monitoring, reports of suspicious activity, and the closure of inactive accounts. Specialist security and VAT teams are actively investigating and delivering improvements to strengthen VAT account security, which could include restricting accounts where fraudulent activity has not been identified.
When and if fraudulent activity has occurred, HMRC contacts affected customers to explain the remedial actions taken and outline any steps they need to take.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
2 Feb 2026, 5:15 p.m. - House of Commons "make it available to investigators. >> So Christopher Chope. >> Madam Deputy Speaker, does the " Rt Hon Darren Jones MP, Minister of State (Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister) (Bristol North West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Feb 2026, 4:58 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Yeah. >> So Christopher Chope. >> Madam Deputy Speaker, it's a " Dr Luke Evans MP (Hinckley and Bosworth, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Feb 2026, 9:48 a.m. - House of Commons " Sir Christopher Chope. " Lilian Greenwood MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) (Nottingham South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Feb 2026, 10:56 a.m. - House of Commons "that, the better. >> So Christopher Chope. >> Mr. speaker, does the Minister share my concern about the " Chris Ward MP, The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Feb 2026, 9:45 a.m. - House of Commons " Christopher Chope. >> Christopher Chope. >> Question number five, Mr. Speaker. >> Minister. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This government is championing the UK's " Rt Hon Ian Murray MP, The Minister of State, Department for Culture, Media and Sport (Edinburgh South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 27th February 2026
Special Report - 5th Special Report - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy: Government Response Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Work of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Bill Esterson (Chair); Sir Christopher Chope; Lizzi Collinge; Torcuil |
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026
Report - 5th Report - Elections within the House of Commons Procedure Committee Found: Asser (Labour; West Ham and Beckton) Bambos Charalambous (Labour; Southgate and Wood Green) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026
Report - 4th Report – Call lists Procedure Committee Found: Asser (Labour; West Ham and Beckton) Bambos Charalambous (Labour; Southgate and Wood Green) Sir Christopher Chope |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th February 2026 1 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero At 1:30pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP - Secretary of State at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Clive Maxwell CB CBE - Interim Permanent Secretary at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th February 2026 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Revisiting the nuclear roadmap At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Sue Ferns - Senior Deputy General Secretary at Prospect Trade Union David Cunningham - Chartered nuclear engineer Mark Rouse - Skills Director at Nuclear Sector Skills Team At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Zion Lights - Science communicator Cllr Struan Mackie - Highland Councillor at Thurso and Northwest Caithness and Chair of Dounreay Stakeholder Group Cllr Richard Rout - Chair of the New Nuclear Local Authorities Group at Suffolk County Council View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The cost of energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Jonathan Brearley - Chief Executive at Ofgem Akshay Kaul - Director General for Infrastructure at Ofgem Fintan Slye - Chief Executive Officer at National Energy System Operator (NESO) Claire Dykta - Director of Strategy and Policy at National Energy System Operator (NESO) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Warm Homes Plan At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Dr Brenda Boardman - Emeritus Fellow, Environmental Change Institute at University of Oxford Dion Tickner - Energy Policy Manager at Age UK Peter Smith - Director of Policy and Advocacy at National Energy Action At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Sam Perry - Heat Workforce Policy Lead at TUC Louise Shooter - Head of Heat Decarbonisation at Energy UK Joanne Wheeler - Co-Head of Policy and Places at UK Green Building Council View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The cost of energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Michael Shanks MP - Minister for Energy at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Jonathan Mills CB - Director General for Energy Markets and Supply at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 5th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
6 Feb 2026
Reviewing the electricity market Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 27 Mar 2026) The Committee is inquiring into what reforms are needed to the UK electricity market to enable the transition to clean, lower cost energy by 2023. After long consultation, the Government indicated last year that it does not intend to undertake wholesale reform toward a model of locational pricing. But it has not set out its thinking or research on the range of possible individual reforms to the current system, that could break down some of the blocks and inefficiencies in the current market (see the Committee’s ongoing inquiry on the Cost of Energy for more work on those). Progressive vs wholesale reform The Committee is now inviting evidence on the range of possible reforms open to Government to implement and their impacts on reaching the UK’s twin goals of 95% clean energy generation by 2030 and bringing down energy bills. |
|
16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?
3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber? |