To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Treasury: Re-employment
Tuesday 17th January 2017

Asked by: David Lammy (Labour - Tottenham)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many members of staff who ceased to be employed by his Department, its agencies and non-departmental public bodies in the last three years have subsequently been re-employed by his Department on a temporary basis or as a third-party contractor or consultant.

Answered by Simon Kirby

The information requested is not readily available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.


Written Question
Concentrix: Tottenham
Tuesday 8th November 2016

Asked by: David Lammy (Labour - Tottenham)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many people in Tottenham constituency have had a tax credit claim stopped by Concentrix.

Answered by Jane Ellison

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will be preparing regional analysis of tax credits claims and Mandatory Reconsideration requests, and this will be available in due course.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 11 Jul 2016
Article 50: Parliamentary Approval

"Is not the situation a bit more than ticklish? This is the biggest constitutional change for our country for half a century. Last week, Chilcot criticised the legal processes that led to the Iraq war, criticised the way in which prerogative power worked in the run-up to that war and, …..."
David Lammy - View Speech

View all David Lammy (Lab - Tottenham) contributions to the debate on: Article 50: Parliamentary Approval

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 30 Jun 2016
Bank Branch Closures

"I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for City of Chester (Christian Matheson) and the hon. Member for Wells (James Heappey) on securing this important debate and echo the concerns that have been raised. Looking at the evidence, it appears that the Government lack the political will to hold the …..."
David Lammy - View Speech

View all David Lammy (Lab - Tottenham) contributions to the debate on: Bank Branch Closures

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 30 Jun 2016
Bank Branch Closures

"The hon. Lady makes an excellent point; that is also my experience.

I am talking about consultation with democratically elected people. Banks certainly ought to speak to the local authority leader before making a decision to say, “We’re thinking about it. What do you think the impact might be?” All …..."

David Lammy - View Speech

View all David Lammy (Lab - Tottenham) contributions to the debate on: Bank Branch Closures

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 30 Jun 2016
Bank Branch Closures

"My hon. Friend is right. The House will recall the hugely important role that building societies played in local communities 20 years ago. We destroyed that important relationship as they all merged and became banks, and now we are left where we are. That local proximity and that different structure …..."
David Lammy - View Speech

View all David Lammy (Lab - Tottenham) contributions to the debate on: Bank Branch Closures

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 30 Jun 2016
Bank Branch Closures

"The hon. Gentleman has just made an excellent point, but may I ask him this? Given the iconic status of Glastonbury, and given the problems that clearly existed before the last branch closed, did the bank bother to consult him before making its decision, or was he presented with a …..."
David Lammy - View Speech

View all David Lammy (Lab - Tottenham) contributions to the debate on: Bank Branch Closures

Written Question
Bank Services
Wednesday 1st June 2016

Asked by: David Lammy (Labour - Tottenham)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans his Department has to submit evidence to the independent review of the British Bankers' Association Access to Banking Protocol led by Professor Russell Griggs.

Answered by Harriett Baldwin - Shadow Minister (Business and Trade)

The Government welcomed the industry-wide Access to Banking protocol announced in March 2015. The Government believes that banks should act in the best interests of their customers and continue to serve the needs of the consumer as well as the wider economy. Although decisions on opening and closing branches are commercial ones, in which the Government does not intervene, it is imperative that the banks live up to the spirit, as well as the letter, of the commitments in the protocol.

The British Bankers’ Association consulted relevant government departments and the regulator, as envisaged in the protocol, when it appointed Professor Russel Griggs to lead the independent review. The independent reviewer’s role is to consider and identify best practice in implementation and, if appropriate, make recommendations for amendments to the protocol to ensure it continues to meet its objectives.

The Government has not assessed the impact of the protocol or banks’ compliance with their commitments in the protocol and as such will not submit formal evidence. However, the Government awaits the independent review’s conclusions, and any recommendations that the reviewer makes for the future of the protocol, when they are published later this year.


Written Question
Bank Services
Wednesday 1st June 2016

Asked by: David Lammy (Labour - Tottenham)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions his Department has had with the British Bankers' Association Industry Protocol on how effectively banks have applied and implemented the Protocol during its first year and the efficacy of the Protocol in mitigating the effect of branch closures on (a) local businesses and (b) the elderly, disabled and other vulnerable customers.

Answered by Harriett Baldwin - Shadow Minister (Business and Trade)

The Government welcomed the industry-wide Access to Banking protocol announced in March 2015. The Government believes that banks should act in the best interests of their customers and continue to serve the needs of the consumer as well as the wider economy. Although decisions on opening and closing branches are commercial ones, in which the Government does not intervene, it is imperative that the banks live up to the spirit, as well as the letter, of the commitments in the protocol.

The British Bankers’ Association consulted relevant government departments and the regulator, as envisaged in the protocol, when it appointed Professor Russel Griggs to lead the independent review. The independent reviewer’s role is to consider and identify best practice in implementation and, if appropriate, make recommendations for amendments to the protocol to ensure it continues to meet its objectives.

The Government has not assessed the impact of the protocol or banks’ compliance with their commitments in the protocol and as such will not submit formal evidence. However, the Government awaits the independent review’s conclusions, and any recommendations that the reviewer makes for the future of the protocol, when they are published later this year.


Written Question
Bank Services
Wednesday 1st June 2016

Asked by: David Lammy (Labour - Tottenham)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the efficacy of the British Bankers' Association Industry Protocol on Branch Closures in mitigating the effect of branch closures on local businesses and customers.

Answered by Harriett Baldwin - Shadow Minister (Business and Trade)

The Government welcomed the industry-wide Access to Banking protocol announced in March 2015. The Government believes that banks should act in the best interests of their customers and continue to serve the needs of the consumer as well as the wider economy. Although decisions on opening and closing branches are commercial ones, in which the Government does not intervene, it is imperative that the banks live up to the spirit, as well as the letter, of the commitments in the protocol.

The British Bankers’ Association consulted relevant government departments and the regulator, as envisaged in the protocol, when it appointed Professor Russel Griggs to lead the independent review. The independent reviewer’s role is to consider and identify best practice in implementation and, if appropriate, make recommendations for amendments to the protocol to ensure it continues to meet its objectives.

The Government has not assessed the impact of the protocol or banks’ compliance with their commitments in the protocol and as such will not submit formal evidence. However, the Government awaits the independent review’s conclusions, and any recommendations that the reviewer makes for the future of the protocol, when they are published later this year.