To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Scheduled Event - Friday 29th January - Add to calendar
View Source
Commons - Private Members' Bills - Main Chamber
Welfare Reform Bill 2026-27
MP: David Simmonds
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
David Simmonds (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 64 Conservative No votes vs 21 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 218
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
David Simmonds (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 17 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286
Written Question
Asylum
Friday 11th September 2026

Asked by: David Simmonds (Conservative - Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Government plans to make changes to the dispersal system for asylum seekers to different local authority areas.

Answered by Anna Turley - Minister of State (Home Office)


The Home Office remains responsible for meeting its statutory obligations to accommodate asylum seekers under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Decisions on the procurement and allocation of asylum accommodation are therefore a matter for the Home Office.

The Department works closely with local authorities, Strategic Migration Partnerships and other local partners to inform decisions on asylum accommodation provision. Local authorities are consulted on proposed dispersed accommodation properties and are able to provide local information and intelligence to support decision-making.


Written Question
Industrial Disputes: Birmingham City Council
Friday 11th September 2026

Asked by: David Simmonds (Conservative - Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what discussions has the (a) Secretary of State and (b) Minister for Local Government had with (i) Birmingham City Council, (ii) the Best Value intervention team, (iii) trade unions on the bin strike in Birmingham.

Answered by Jim McMahon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

During the acute phase of the waste dispute last year, the Government took decisive action in lock step with the Council to ensure waste in the city was safely and sustainably managed. The result was to establish a regular, reliable waste collection service despite industrial action.

The ongoing waste dispute is damaging for the residents and reputation of the great city of Birmingham. It is disappointing that a resolution has not yet been achieved, but this matter remains a local issue and is between Birmingham City Council, as the employer, and Unite, representing employees. The Government is not a party to this dispute, but we continue to urge both parties to work together to bring about a sustainable solution to end the strike, in the interests of the people of Birmingham.

We take the progress made across Birmingham City Council very seriously. A successful and prospering Birmingham is a priority for this government, and the department regularly engages with the Council in line with standard practice for statutory interventions. This is alongside receiving regular updates on progress from Commissioners, including on the waste dispute.


Division Vote (Commons)
10 Sep 2026 - Social Housing Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
David Simmonds (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 292
Written Question
Homelessness
Thursday 10th September 2026

Asked by: David Simmonds (Conservative - Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Answer of 5 August 2026 to Question HL2418, on Homelessness, what is the total amount of (a) CDEL and (b) RDEL funding in each year of the Spending Review which is currently uncommitted.

Answered by Florence Eshalomi - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

In line HM Treasury guidance, departments are expected to manage new pressures within existing budgets and therefore maintain robust contingency arrangements. Departments are required to identify around 5 percent of their allocated Departmental Expenditure Limits that could be reprioritised if unforeseen pressures arise, either through unallocated provision, contingency plans, or a combination of the two.

Consistent with this approach, MHCLG retains a degree of budget flexibility rather than committing all funding at the start of the financial year. The precise level of flexibility changes as budgets are allocated and decisions taken over the course of the financial year and the Spending Review period.


Written Question
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: Research
Thursday 10th September 2026

Asked by: David Simmonds (Conservative - Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to ref: 5105613138 in her Department's document entitled MHCLG: spending over £25,000, May 2026, published on 10 August 2026, what are the terms of reference for the Multiple Disadvantage Research to be conducted by Verian Group UK Limited.

Answered by Jim McMahon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The multiple disadvantage research carried out by Verian included the preparation of a series of webinars which will share the learning generated from the evaluation of Changing Futures 1 with the sector, and internal work to support the design and delivery of the evaluation of Changing Futures 2.


Division Vote (Commons)
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context
David Simmonds (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100
Written Question
Housing: Repairs and Maintenance
Wednesday 9th September 2026

Asked by: David Simmonds (Conservative - Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what was the business case for the Avant Homes payment plan agreement for its Developer Remediation Contract of January 2026; and how many other housing developers have been given payment plans agreements.

Answered by Florence Eshalomi - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Under the Developer Remediation Contract, developers committed to fix or pay to fix over 2,600 buildings at a cost to themselves of around £4.2bn. This includes repaying taxpayers for money spent to fix any of those buildings through government schemes.

The terms of the Contract, which are publicly available, provide for any developer who signed it to request a payment plan to allow it to spread those repayments over an agreed period, with interest.

Developer eligibility is informed by due diligence undertaken by government.

To date, government has agreed a payment plan with one developer (Avant Homes).