Fred Thomas Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Fred Thomas

Information between 8th September 2025 - 18th October 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 278 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 300
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Fred Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300


Written Answers
Fampridine
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Monday 15th September 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has had discussions with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on the prescription of Fampridine as a treatment for MS.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Ministers and departmental officials have regular discussions with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on a range of issues, including in relation to its guidelines.

NICE’s guideline on the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis in adults, published in June 2022, recommends that fampridine should not be offered to treat mobility issues in people with multiple sclerosis as it is not found to be a cost-effective treatment.

General Practitioners: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Friday 12th September 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing standardised charges for (a) non-core GP services and (b) the D4 medical check for drivers.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

There are some medical evidence letters, certificates, or reports that general practices (GPs) may charge for, and other certificates that they must not charge patients for. The legislation that sets this out is the General Medical Services and Personal Medical Services Regulations, which forms the basis of the GP Contract with the National Health Service. The D4 medical checks are considered private work.

The Professional Fees Committee of the British Medical Association suggests guideline fees for such services to help doctors set their own fees, and in some instances, have agreed standardised fees directly with organisations for some public services. For GPs setting their own fees, we would expect practices to charge a reasonable sum for any workload involved, and to forewarn patients at the earliest opportunity.

The Government is intent on reducing the burden of administrative tasks and unnecessary bureaucracy. This includes encouraging the use of alternative evidence where medical evidence is not part of the GP Contract, and this may include hospital discharge letters, previous reports, or prescriptions, as in many cases these will be accepted as evidence.

The Government and NHS England have launched a Red Tape Challenge to cut down on bureaucracy, to free up time to spend with patients. The 10-Year Health Plan set outs our commitment to deliver the recommendations of the Red Tape Challenge, which includes ensuring that GPs can spend less time filling in forms and more time caring for patients.

Disability Aids
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Thursday 11th September 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to help ensure that essential home adaptations required for hospital discharge are (a) supported and (b) delivered in a timely manner.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The statutory ‘Hospital discharge and community support guidance’ outlines that health and care systems and providers should collaborate to share information early to support a safe and timely discharge, minimise issues that may disrupt care provision, and ensure necessary home adaptations and equipment are considered, while also requiring local authorities to engage housing services to provide support and advice where needed.

In January, we published a new policy framework for the Better Care Fund, which requires local areas to agree joint plans, developed in collaboration with local housing authorities, that achieve more timely and effective hospital discharge.

Housing adaptations, including those delivered through the Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) play a key role in supporting these objectives by funding changes that help people remain well, safe, and independent at home for longer. We have provided an additional £172 million across this and the last financial year to uplift the DFG, which could provide around 15,600 home adaptations to give older and disabled people more independence in their homes. This brings the total funding for the DFG to £711 million in 2024/25 and 2025/26.

Alongside this, local authorities have a statutory duty under various legislations, including the Care Act 2014 and the Children and Families Act 2014, to ensure provision of community equipment and disability aids in order to meet the assessed eligible needs of individuals who are resident in their area, which help support independent living at home. This facilitates safe discharge into the community from hospital and prevents avoidable admissions into acute services, such as hospitals or care homes.

Child Maintenance Service
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Wednesday 10th September 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what evidence the Child Maintenance Service requires to incorporate (a) additional income from online selling platforms and (b) other additional income sources in their calculations.

Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)

Information about the paying parent's gross income is taken directly from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for the latest tax year available. This allows calculations to be made quickly and accurately. Any income subject to income tax including bonuses and overtime received by an employed paying parent, is included within their gross weekly income when calculating a child maintenance liability.

For self-employed paying parents, the gross income used in a maintenance calculation is provided by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) in the first instance. HMRC will provide details of the gross taxable profit of the paying parent's business, for the most recent complete tax year.

People who are self-employed are required to keep accurate records of their business income and expenses for tax purposes. HMRC can charge penalties for inaccurate reporting where it results in tax being unpaid.

Variations legislation allows the Child Maintenance Service to look at some circumstances which are not covered by the basic maintenance calculation. Either parent may apply for a variation at any time during the life of their case, provided enough information for an appropriate ground can be identified. If a variation application is successful, the maintenance calculation will be adjusted accordingly.

Cases involving complex income can be investigated by the Financial Investigation Unit. This is a specialist team which can request information from financial institutions (such as banks, investment companies and mortgage companies) to check the accuracy of information that the CMS is given. If any discrepancies are found, then they can implement a correct maintenance liability that is supported by CMS legislation

The Department has been conducting a review of the child maintenance calculation to make sure it is fit for purpose and reflects today’s social trends. The review will also consider the treatment of unearned income and assets within the automatic calculation.

Child Maintenance Service
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Wednesday 10th September 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps the Child Maintenance Service is taking to help tackle cases where undeclared income from the paying parent is found.

Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)

Information about the paying parent's gross income is taken directly from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for the latest tax year available. This allows calculations to be made quickly and accurately. Any income subject to income tax including bonuses and overtime received by an employed paying parent, is included within their gross weekly income when calculating a child maintenance liability.

For self-employed paying parents, the gross income used in a maintenance calculation is provided by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) in the first instance. HMRC will provide details of the gross taxable profit of the paying parent's business, for the most recent complete tax year.

People who are self-employed are required to keep accurate records of their business income and expenses for tax purposes. HMRC can charge penalties for inaccurate reporting where it results in tax being unpaid.

Variations legislation allows the Child Maintenance Service to look at some circumstances which are not covered by the basic maintenance calculation. Either parent may apply for a variation at any time during the life of their case, provided enough information for an appropriate ground can be identified. If a variation application is successful, the maintenance calculation will be adjusted accordingly.

Cases involving complex income can be investigated by the Financial Investigation Unit. This is a specialist team which can request information from financial institutions (such as banks, investment companies and mortgage companies) to check the accuracy of information that the CMS is given. If any discrepancies are found, then they can implement a correct maintenance liability that is supported by CMS legislation

The Department has been conducting a review of the child maintenance calculation to make sure it is fit for purpose and reflects today’s social trends. The review will also consider the treatment of unearned income and assets within the automatic calculation.

Nurseries: CCTV
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Tuesday 23rd September 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of bringing forward legislative proposals to mandate the use of CCTV in nurseries.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

The department continually monitors and reviews safeguarding requirements for early years settings to make sure children are kept as safe as possible.

The decision to install and use camera surveillance equipment in a nursery is a matter for individual providers to determine based on their own risk assessment and policies.

The department is currently reviewing with Ofsted how CCTV is used in early years settings and how we can support settings to use it effectively as part of their safeguarding provision.

Nurseries: Safety
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Tuesday 23rd September 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of introducing mandatory safe sleep training for all early years staff working in nurseries.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

The early years foundation stage (EYFS) statutory framework, which all early years providers are required to follow, includes a requirement for babies to be placed down to sleep in line with the latest government safety guidance, which can be found here: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids/.

Departmental officials recently met with The Lullaby Trust to discuss the lessons that can be learned from previous serious incidents and to ensure that children are kept as safe as possible.

The 'Early years qualification requirements and standards' document sets out the minimum qualification requirements that staff must meet to be recognised as level 2, level 3 or level 6 members of staff for the purpose of working within the EYFS staff:child ratios. Both the level 2 and level 3 criteria include knowledge of rest and sleep provision, with level 3 also including the safe use of equipment, furniture and materials with regard for sleep safety.

Pre-school Education: Inspections
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Thursday 25th September 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of introducing unannounced Ofsted inspections in early years settings.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

While Ofsted does typically provide notice before an inspection in early years, inspections without prior notification do happen, particularly when concerns have been raised about a setting or if a previous inspection resulted in a grade of ‘Inadequate’.

Between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025 there were 1,400 unannounced inspections in early years, which was 16% of all inspections. The department recognises the importance of unannounced inspections and they will continue.

Routine announced inspections are also an important part of the system. We are increasing inspection frequency in early years to ensure better oversight of the setting landscape, and more regular inspections will be most effective when accompanied by improvements to inspection quality.

Armed Forces: Children
Asked by: Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
Wednesday 8th October 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the challenges faced by military families when applying for school places (a) during school holiday periods and (b) other times outside of the normal admissions cycle.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The department is committed to supporting the education of service children. Families of UK service personnel can be subject to frequent moves, often requiring them to apply for school places outside the normal admissions round.

The School Admissions Code requires admission authorities to allocate school places in advance of a service family moving into the area, where certain conditions are met.

Children eligible for the Service Pupil Premium can be prioritised in oversubscription criteria, and service pupils can be admitted as exceptions to the infant class size limit, outside the normal admissions round. Publicly-funded boarding schools must give second highest priority to service children who qualify for Ministry of Defence assistance with boarding fees.

Through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, we are taking further steps to support children having difficulty securing school places in-year by giving local authorities improved levers to secure places for children quickly and efficiently.



MP Financial Interests
15th September 2025
Fred Thomas (Labour - Plymouth Moor View)
8. Miscellaneous
Honorary unpaid position as 'ambassador' for the HALO Trust, the UK mine clearance and conflict prevention charity.
Source



Fred Thomas mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Monday 15th September 2025
Formal Minutes - Defence Committee Formal Minutes 2024-25 (until Summer recess)

Defence Committee

Found: Baker Lincoln Jopp Emma Lewell-Buck Jesse Norman Mike Martin Ian Roome Michelle Scrogham Fred Thomas

Tuesday 9th September 2025
Oral Evidence - Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), and Centre for Statecraft and National Security, King's College London

AUKUS - Defence Committee

Found: Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Chair); Mr Calvin Bailey; Jesse Norman; Ian Roome; Michelle Scrogham; Fred Thomas




Fred Thomas - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 21st October 2025 10 a.m.
Defence Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: AUKUS
At 10:30am: Oral evidence
Steve Timms - Managing Director at BAE Systems Submarines
Steve Carlier - President at Rolls Royce Submarines Limited
Harry Holt - Chief Executive Nuclear at Babcock International Group
At 11:30am: Oral evidence
Samira Braund - Defence Director at ADS Group
Andrew Kinniburgh - Director-General at Make UK Defence
Matthew Evans - Chief Operating Officer and Director of Markets at techUK
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 4th November 2025 9:30 a.m.
Defence Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes
At 10:30am: Oral evidence
Holly Bancroft - Home Affairs Correspondent at The Independent
Larisa Brown - Defence Editor at The Times
Mr Sam Greenhill - Chief Reporter at Daily Mail
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Monday 15th September 2025
Formal Minutes - Defence Committee Formal Minutes 2024-25 (until Summer recess)

Defence Committee
Wednesday 17th September 2025
Written Evidence - Ministry of Defence
UKCES0032 - The UK contribution to European Security

The UK contribution to European Security - Defence Committee
Tuesday 9th September 2025
Oral Evidence - Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), and Centre for Statecraft and National Security, King's College London

AUKUS - Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Ministry of Defence paper providing information on Defence Reform

Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Letter from the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry to the Chair dated 15th October providing a quarterly update on the UK Military Flying Training System (UKMFTS).

Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Letter dated 17th September from GC Gavin Anderson to Chair providing an update on the new Cyber & Specialist Operations Command (CSOC)

Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Oral Evidence - BAE Systems Submarines, Rolls Royce Submarines Limited, and Babcock International Group

AUKUS - Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Letter from the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry to the Chair dated 19th September providing an update on the F-35 Lightning Force and Atlas A400M

Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Letter from the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry to the Chair dated 15th October providing Royal Navy Surface Fleet readiness days data

Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Letter from the Chair to the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry dated 10th October regarding the Fleet Solid Support (FSS) ship programme

Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Special Report - 5th Special Report - Defence in the Grey Zone: Government Response

Defence Committee
Tuesday 21st October 2025
Correspondence - Letter dated 10th October from the Minister for Veterans and People to Chair providing an update regarding the Armed Forces Commissioner appointment

Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Solace
ADBRS0008 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - University College London (UCL), London Metropolitan University, University College London (UCL), London Metropolitan University, University College London (UCL), University College London (UCL), and London Middlesex University
ADBRS0019 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Mr Mohammad Rafi Hottak
ADBRS0021 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - FairGo CIC
ADBRS0005 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Afghan Solidarity Coalition (ASC)
ADBRS0011 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - COSLA
ADBRS0013 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Daily Mail
ADBRS0007 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Sulha Alliance
ADBRS0017 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Defence On The Brink
ADBRS0018 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Refugee Legal Support
ADBRS0010 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - ADBRS0006 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Wakefield MDC
ADBRS0012 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Local Government Association
ADBRS0022 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee
Friday 24th October 2025
Written Evidence - Ministry of Defence
ADBRS0024 - Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes

Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee