Oral Answers to Questions

Harriet Cross Excerpts
Monday 14th July 2025

(2 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jim McMahon Portrait Jim McMahon
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are in a consultation now, so we are willing and ready to hear representations, but many people—I am not accusing the hon. Member of this—have jumped to conclusions based on headlines that are not supported by the evidence when we track where money ultimately goes. All the matters that she rightly said need to be taken into account are taken into account. In the consultation, we have included the cost of temporary accommodation in the base formula for the first time ever, so she will find that outer-London boroughs in particular will benefit from that. So far, they have been underappreciated for the cost of that pressure.

Harriet Cross Portrait Harriet Cross (Gordon and Buchan) (Con)
- Hansard - -

12. What plans she has to increase community involvement in the planning process.

Sarah Bool Portrait Sarah Bool (South Northamptonshire) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

22. What plans she has to increase community involvement in the planning process.

Matthew Pennycook Portrait The Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government strongly encourage broad community engagement in the planning process, and we want to see greater public participation in the development of local plans in particular. We are currently exploring new ways to increase and enhance community engagement in the planning process, including by improving access to planning data through its digitisation.

Harriet Cross Portrait Harriet Cross
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I am sure the Minister agrees it is vital that local residents’ concerns are properly listened to, especially on major planning decisions. Having listened to many constituents in places such as New Deer, Kintore and Rothienorman who are facing huge amounts of energy infrastructure, I tabled an amendment to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill that would have created a statutory duty of consultation for infrastructure in Scotland. In Committee, the Minister argued against it and said that the Scottish Government’s discretionary power was satisfactory. Will he please explain why the Government believe that a discretionary power, which my constituents fear will simply be ignored, provides meaningful engagement while the statutory right that I proposed would not?

Matthew Pennycook Portrait Matthew Pennycook
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can do no better than to draw the hon. Lady’s attention to the extensive remarks that I made in the Bill Committee.