Information between 11th September 2025 - 21st October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
 Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes | 
|---|
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161  | 
| 
    15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161  | 
| 
    16 Sep 2025 - Child Poverty Strategy  (Removal of Two Child Limit) - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 79  | 
| Speeches | 
|---|
| 
       
        
            Jack Rankin speeches from: Manchester Terrorism Attack
            
                 Jack Rankin contributed 1 speech (148 words) Monday 13th October 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office  | 
    
| 
       
        
            Jack Rankin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
            
                 Jack Rankin contributed 2 speeches (95 words) Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice  | 
    
| Written Answers | 
|---|
| 
        
            Palestian Authority
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 17th September 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, with reference to the policy paper entitled UK and Palestinian strategic cooperation: memorandum of understanding, published on 28 April 2025, what recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of the Palestinian Authority’s commitment to peaceful coexistence with neighbouring countries. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) I refer the Hon Member to my response of 17 September to Question 74028.  | 
| 
        
            Prisons: Food
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 15th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the estimated average cost of a prisoner's breakfast is according to the latest available data. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip Data about expenditure on food and specific meals is not held centrally. Prison food budgets are determined locally (by the Governor in public sector prisons or the Director in privately managed prisons). They are kept under review as part of normal non-pay budget allocation. Our policy sets out clear expectations to provide for three balanced nutritious meals a day, including breakfast and catering managers are provided guidance to support this.  | 
| 
        
            River Thames: Public Footpaths
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 15th October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she is taking to repair and restore footbridges along the Jubilee River; and what estimate she has made of the associated cost to the taxpayer. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Jubilee River is part of the Maidenhead, Windsor and Eaton Flood Alleviation Scheme which is operated and maintained by the Environment Agency. Footbridges along the Jubilee River are the responsibility of the respective local authorities including Buckinghamshire Council, Slough Council and the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The Environment Agency works closely with these councils; however, questions relating to plans to repair and restore these footbridges should be directed to the respective local authority, not the Environment Agency.  | 
| 
        
            Empty Property: Council Tax
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 15th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the empty home premium applies to (a) retirement and (b) care properties where the tenant has passed away and ownership has fallen to an executor. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Local authorities have the discretionary power to charge a council tax premium on long-term empty dwellings in their area. Where the premium is in place, it applies to properties that have been unoccupied and substantially unfurnished for one or more years. The government has introduced regulations on mandatory exceptions, which are explained in guidance here, including an exception where probate has been granted. Once the exemption period has ended, normal rules on empty properties apply.  | 
| 
        
            Neighbourhood Plans: Community Infrastructure Levy
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether Councils are able to use money from the Community Infrastructure Levy to refresh neighbourhood plans. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) receipts must be used for the purposes which are set out in section 216 of the Planning Act 2008 and Part 7 of the CIL regulations. 
 Local authorities must spend the levy on infrastructure needed to support the development of their area Where charging authorities collect the levy, they can use up to 5% of funds from the levy to recover the costs of administering the levy. 
 Where all or part of a chargeable development is within the area of a parish council, the charging authority must pass a proportion of the CIL receipts from the development to the parish council. The ‘neighbourhood portion’ of CIL can be spent on infrastructure or anything else that is concerned with addressing the demands that development places on an area. 
 Further information on spending the levy is set out in CIL guidance which can be found on gov.uk here.  | 
| 
        
            Local Plans: Reform
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the role of local plans in the planning system in the future. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Member to the Written Ministerial Statement made on 27 February 2025 (HCWS480).  | 
| 
        
            Local Plans and Neighbourhood Plans
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether borough local plans have precedence over parish level neighbourhood plans. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Once passed at referendum, neighbourhood plans form part of the development plan. Policies in a neighbourhood plan may become out of date, including if they conflict with policies in a local plan adopted after the making of the neighbourhood plan. In such cases, the more recent plan policy would take precedence.  | 
| 
        
            River Thames: Flood Control
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what estimate she has made of the cost of maintaining and keeping open the Jubilee River Channel in the last four years. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Jubilee River is part of the Maidenhead, Windsor and Eaton Flood Alleviation Scheme which is operated and maintained by the Environment Agency. The cost of maintaining and keeping the Jubilee River channel open are difficult to extract from the overall cost of operating and maintaining the flood alleviation scheme; calculating this would fall into disproportionate costs. The Environment Agency has allocated £2.3m for maintenance and capital improvements on the whole Maidenhead, Windsor and Eaton Flood Alleviation Scheme this year. In previous years spending has varied, depending on the programme of work.  | 
| 
        
            Planning Permission
        
         Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the tilted balance in decision making is formally recognised as part of national planning policy; and what guidance his Department has issued to ensure consistent application by planning authorities. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Users of the National Planning Policy Framework sometimes describe the effect of paragraph 11d of the Framework as a ‘tilted balance’. However, the term itself does not form part of national planning policy. 
 The Framework is a material consideration in decision-making. The government’s suite of planning practice guidance contains guidance for decision makers regarding the application of the policies in the Framework.  | 
| Early Day Motions Signed | 
|---|
| 
        Thursday 23rd October Jack Rankin signed this EDM on Monday 27th October 2025 Poppy Appeal in Northern Ireland 13 signatures (Most recent: 3 Nov 2025)Tabled by: Robin Swann (Ulster Unionist Party - South Antrim) That this House recognises the great and invaluable work of the Royal British Legion and its volunteers in delivering the internationally recognised Poppy Appeal; and calls on the Minister for Veterans and the Minister for the Constitution and European Relations to work with the Royal British Legion and the European …  | 
| 
        Thursday 23rd October Jack Rankin signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd October 2025 Attendance of the Attorney General at the Bar of the House on the Chinese espionage case 25 signatures (Most recent: 27 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark) That this House regrets the collapse of the prosecution of two alleged Chinese spies and is alarmed that the Attorney General, the Rt Hon Lord Hermer KC, was reportedly informed in August 2024 that the prosecution was at risk, yet has not publicly explained what actions he took to support …  | 
| 
        Monday 13th October Jack Rankin signed this EDM as a sponsor on Wednesday 15th October 2025 National inquiry into group-based child sexual exploitation and abuse 25 signatures (Most recent: 30 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Rupert Lowe (Independent - Great Yarmouth) That this House expresses its deep concern at the continued lack of visible progress in establishing the National Inquiry into Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, announced by the Government in June 2025; notes that, four months later, no Chair has been appointed, no Terms of Reference have been published, …  | 
| 
        Monday 15th September Jack Rankin signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 15th September 2025 Conduct of the Hon. Mr Justice Jay 17 signatures (Most recent: 13 Oct 2025)Tabled by: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark) That this House notes with profound concern reports that, during proceedings in the High Court concerning the convicted Al-Qaeda terrorist Haroon Aswat, the Hon. Mr Justice Jay made remarks to the terrorist, extending him "best wishes" and sympathy for his imprisonment ("it could not have been too pleasant being in …  | 
| Live Transcript | 
|---|
| 
             Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.  | 
    
| 
    13 Oct 2025, 5:16 p.m. - House of Commons "that we can be a strong country going forward. >> Jack Rankin thank you. " Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood KC MP, The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Birmingham Ladywood, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript  | 
| Select Committee Documents | 
|---|
| 
        Friday 17th October 2025
         Special Report - 3rd Special Report – The Financing of the Scottish Government: Government response Scottish Affairs Committee Found: Douglas McAllister (Labour; West Dunbartonshire) Susan Murray (Liberal Democrat; Mid Dunbartonshire) Jack Rankin  | 
| 
        Tuesday 16th September 2025
         Report - 3rd report - Problem drug use in Scotland follow-up: Glasgow’s Safer Drug Consumption Facility Scottish Affairs Committee Found: Douglas McAllister (Labour; West Dunbartonshire) Susan Murray (Liberal Democrat; Mid Dunbartonshire) Jack Rankin  | 
| 
        Wednesday 10th September 2025
         Oral Evidence - 2025-09-10 09:30:00+01:00 Industrial transition in Scotland - Scottish Affairs Committee Found: Patricia Ferguson (Chair); Lillian Jones; Mr Angus MacDonald; Douglas McAllister; Susan Murray; Jack Rankin  | 
| Bill Documents | 
|---|
| 
        Sep. 12 2025
     Notices of Amendments as at 12 September 2025 - large print Victims and Courts Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _NC4 Robert Jenrick Dr Kieran Mullan Mike Wood Jack Rankin Mr Richard Holden .  | 
| 
        Sep. 12 2025
     Notices of Amendments as at 12 September 2025 Victims and Courts Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _NC4 Robert Jenrick Dr Kieran Mullan Mike Wood Jack Rankin Mr Richard Holden .  | 
| Calendar | 
|---|
| 
        
        
            Monday 20th October 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Glasgow’s Commonwealth Games 2026 View calendar - Add to calendar  | 
| 
        
        
            Wednesday 15th October 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Private Meeting Subject: GB Energy and the net zero transition View calendar - Add to calendar  | 
| 
        
        
            Tuesday 28th October 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Proposed STV cuts At 9:30am: Oral evidence Nick McGowan-Lowe - National Organiser for Scotland at National Union of Journalists Philippa Childs - Head at Bectu At 10:30am: Oral evidence Rufus Radcliffe - CEO at STV Bobby Hain - Managing Director, Audience (News, Regulatory and Audio) at STV View calendar - Add to calendar  | 
| 
        
        
            Wednesday 29th October 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Industrial transition in Scotland At 9:30am: Oral evidence Sara Thiam - Chief Executive at Prosper Dave Moxham - Deputy General Secretary at Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) At 10:30am: Oral evidence Dame Nancy Rothwell - Deputy Chair at Industrial Strategy Advisory Council Leonie Lambert - Director at Industrial Strategy Advisory Council View calendar - Add to calendar  | 
| 
        
        
            Wednesday 5th November 2025 9 a.m. Scottish Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the department At 9:30am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP - Secretary of State for Scotland at Scotland Office Kirsty McNeill MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland at Scotland Office Fiona Mettam - Director at Scotland Office View calendar - Add to calendar  | 
| Select Committee Inquiry | 
|---|
| 
        
            15 Oct 2025
        
         Proposed STV cuts Scottish Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions No description available  | 
| 
        
            27 Oct 2025
        
         Securing Scotland’s Future: Defence Skills and Jobs Scottish Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The UK Government has committed to increase defence spending to 2.6% of GDP by 2027, with plans to reach 3% in the next Parliament. Given Scotland’s significant role in the UK’s defence sector, this inquiry will explore how Scotland’s economy and job market can benefit, particularly through the creation of highly skilled jobs. The Committee will examine existing skills gaps in the sector, how they can be addressed to maximise the economic impact of investment, and the UK Government’s role in supporting the creation and retention of the skilled jobs needed to grow the defence industry. It will also consider how Scotland can support the delivery of the Defence Industrial Strategy, the Ministry of Defence’s engagement with Scottish SMEs, which dominate the Scottish private sector, as well as the use of local supply chains. Read the call for evidence for more details about the inquiry.  | 
| 
        
            31 Oct 2025
        
         Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links Scottish Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 12 Dec 2025) Transport infrastructure plays an important role among island communities, supporting local economies and ensuring access to essential services. In Scotland, geographic barriers and limited transport options can restrict mobility and contribute to depopulation. This inquiry will examine the strategic case for permanent transport links—such as tunnels and bridges—between Scotland’s islands and assess whether there is a role for the UK Government in supporting such projects. Read the call for evidence for more details about the inquiry.  |