Jack Rankin Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Jack Rankin

Information between 22nd April 2026 - 2nd May 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 80 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155
27 Apr 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over) - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 176
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 164
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 171
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 170
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 170
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 167


Speeches
Jack Rankin speeches from: Education
Jack Rankin contributed 1 speech (36 words)
Monday 27th April 2026 - Written Corrections
Department for Education


Written Answers
Retail Trade: Urban Areas
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what consideration he has given to the potential impact of the planned visitor levy on (a) job opportunities and vacancies, (b) job losses and (c) high street footfall in (i) city centres, (ii) rural communities and (iii) coastal towns as part of her High Street Strategy.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The government’s consultation on the proposed visitor levy closed on 18 February. The government is currently analysing responses and will publish an official response in due course.

The decision on whether to introduce a visitor levy would rest with individual Mayors, who would need to determine whether a levy is right for their area. Any impacts, including on employment and high street footfall, would therefore depend on local decisions, following local consideration and consultation on specific proposals.

Treasury: Written Questions
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when she plans to respond to Question 126382 from the Hon. Member for Windsor.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The answers to PQs UIN126382, UIN 126383 & UIN 126384 have been answered on 16 April 2026. This was within the Parliamentary deadline.

Treasury: Written Questions
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when she plans to respond to Question 126383 from the Hon. Member for Windsor.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The answers to PQs UIN126382, UIN 126383 & UIN 126384 have been answered on 16 April 2026. This was within the Parliamentary deadline.

Treasury: Written Questions
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, when she plans to respond to Question 126384 from the Hon. Member for Windsor.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The answers to PQs UIN126382, UIN 126383 & UIN 126384 have been answered on 16 April 2026. This was within the Parliamentary deadline.

Visitor Levy: Young People
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of the introduction of a visitor levy on the number of young people employed in hospitality.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The impacts of introducing a visitor levy will depend on decisions taken locally. It would be for Mayors and local leaders to decide whether a levy is appropriate for their area, following local consultation on specific proposals.

The detailed design and scope of any visitor levy remain under development. The Government’s response to the consultation, which closed on 18 February, will be published in due course.

Visitor Levy
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has undertaken modelling of the potential impact of introducing an overnight visitor levy on tourism demand in terms of a) number of nights stayed by domestic and international visitors, b) number of visits by domestic and international visitors, c) accommodation spend linked to number of nights spent in accommodation and d) tourism spend.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.

At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.

The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Evidence from international and domestic schemes suggested modest rates have minimal impact on visitor numbers. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment.

Visitor Levy
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has undertaken modelling on the potential impact of introducing an overnight visitor levy on a) high street footfall, b) numbers of empty shops and c) social mobility.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.

At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.

The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Evidence from international and domestic schemes suggested modest rates have minimal impact on visitor numbers. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment.

Visitor Levy
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has undertaken an assessment of the potential impact of an overnight visitor levy on (a) employment in the hospitality and tourism sector, (b) regional growth and (c) tax receipts, including (i) VAT, (ii) income tax and (iii) National Insurance contributions associated with overnight stays and related visitor spending.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.

At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.

The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Evidence from international and domestic schemes suggested modest rates have minimal impact on visitor numbers. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment.

Visitor Levy
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has undertaken modelling of the potential impact of introducing an overnight visitor levy on the economy in terms of a) jobs, b) GDP, c) sectoral investment and d) net tax benefit.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.

At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.

The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Evidence from international and domestic schemes suggested modest rates have minimal impact on visitor numbers. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment.

Visitor Levy: Hospitality Industry
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Thursday 23rd April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the evidence they commissioned prior to launching a consultation on introducing an overnight levy included an international comparison of VAT levels on hospitality.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Ahead of launching the consultation, the Government considered a broad range of evidence on the case for a discretionary overnight visitor levy, including international comparisons of VAT rates on hospitality. The consultation closed on 18 February, and the Government will publish its formal response in due course.

Any decision to introduce a levy would be taken locally, with Mayors required to consult widely before determining whether it is appropriate for their area.

Home Office: Written Questions
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Friday 24th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to respond to Question 126358 from the Hon. Member for Windsor.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

A response to this question was issued on April 20th, 2026.

Home Office: Written Questions
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to respond to Question 121021 from the Hon. Member for Windsor.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Hon Member received an answer on April 29, 2026.

Home Office: Apprentices
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many apprentices her Department recruited in (a) 2025, (b) 2022, (c) 2023 and (d) 2024.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The number of apprentices that enrolled onto apprenticeship programmes within the department in each calendar year is as follows:

Year Apprentice Enrolments

2022 475

2023 890

2024 944

2025 233

Apprenticeship enrolments have reduced due to workforce controls, a prolonged pause of the Public Sector Operational Delivery Officer apprenticeship (which previously accounted for 70–80% of starts), and reform changes to available standards. Data includes all 39 apprenticeship standards used across the Home Office.

Schools: Knives
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many children have been the victim of a stabbing incident in educational settings in each of the last two academic years for which data is available by type of setting.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Department for Education: Written Questions
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when she plans to respond to Question 120248 from the Hon. Member for Windsor.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Students: Loans
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she plans to pause recovery action being undertaken by the Student Loans Company against students whose universities misclassified weekend courses as in-attendance courses whilst any (a) review and (b) regulatory action takes place.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Students: Loans
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential merits of introducing transitional protection for students who enrolled on university courses since found to have been wrongly classified for student finance purposes.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Students: Loans
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of Student Loan Company recovery action following the misclassification of weekend courses as in-attendance courses for the purposes of student finance on students.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Universities
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Wednesday 29th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to support universities in correctly classify courses (a) in-attendance and (b) weekend only.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.




Jack Rankin mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

29 Apr 2026, 12:52 p.m. - House of Commons
"Morrissey. Andrew Griffith. Claire Coutinho. Laura Trott. Jack Rankin. Nick Timothy. John Cooper. Neil "
Alan Mak MP (Havant, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
In-Person Banking Services
3 speeches (1,460 words)
1st reading
Wednesday 29th April 2026 - Commons Chamber

Mentions:
1: Alan Mak (Con - Havant) Mak, Sir Jeremy Hunt, John Glen, Joy Morrissey, Andrew Griffith, Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott, Jack Rankin - Link to Speech




Jack Rankin - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Thursday 14th May 2026 10 a.m.
Scottish Affairs Committee - Private Meeting
Subject: GB Energy and the net zero transition
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 20th May 2026 9 a.m.
Scottish Affairs Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links
At 9:30am: Oral evidence
Councillor Heather Woodbridge - Leader at Orkney Islands Council
Councillor Paul F Steele - Leader at Western Isles Council
Councillor Gary Robinson - Depute Leader at Shetland Islands Council
At 10:30am: Oral evidence
Andy Sloan - Managing Director, UK and Ireland at COWI
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - ZetTrans - Shetland's Regional Transport Partnership
CISFL0004 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Rupert Joy
CISFL0003 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Dr Walter Cormack
CISFL0005 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Mrs Caroline Webster
CISFL0013 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Road Haulage Association
CISFL0015 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Shetland Islands Council
CISFL0012 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Neil Kermode
CISFL0011 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - COWI
CISFL0010 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Travis Newby-Tucker
CISFL0002 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Leslie Sinclair
CISFL0007 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - The Highlands and Islands Transport Partnership (HITRANS)
CISFL0009 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Written Evidence - Scottish Wholesale Association
CISFL0006 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-04-22 09:30:00+01:00

Securing Scotland’s Future: Defence Skills and Jobs - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - North Yell Development Council (NYDC)
CISFL0030 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Unst Tunnel Action Group
CISFL0029 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Yell Tunnel Action Group
CISFL0031 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - SaxaVord Spaceport
CISFL0027 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - The Institution of Civil Engineers
CISFL0017 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Quality Meat Scotland
CISFL0018 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - VisitScotland
CISFL0019 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Highlands and Islands Enterprise
CISFL0024 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Scrutiny evidence - Note of Scottish Affairs Committee visit to Paisley

Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Scrutiny evidence - Public survey into ‘Connectivity in Scotland: Digital connectivity’ – summary of results

Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Western Isles Council (Comhairle nan Eilean Siar)
CISFL0022 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Islands Strategic Partnership
CISFL0021 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Seafood Shetland
CISFL0026 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - The Scotch Whisky Association
CISFL0020 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence with Sky following up from 25 March session, dated 20 April 2026 & 14 April 2026

Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from VodafoneThree following up from 25 March session, dated 20 April 2026.

Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence with Scotland Public Pensions Agency regarding McCloud Remedy, dated 20 April 2026 & 8 April 2026

Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Salmon Scotland
CISFL0023 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - The Department for Transport (DfT)
CISFL0028 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - Quality Meat Scotland
CISFL0018 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - VisitScotland
CISFL0019 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Written Evidence - The Institution of Civil Engineers
CISFL0017 - Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links

Connectivity in Scotland: Fixed links - Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from TalkTalk following up from 25 March session, dated 20 April 2026

Scottish Affairs Committee
Thursday 14th May 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Energy Minister Michael Shanks following up from 15 April evidence session, dated 13 May 2026

Scottish Affairs Committee
Friday 15th May 2026
Estimate memoranda - Memorandum on the Scotland Office and Office of the Advocate General Main Estimates 2026-2027

Scottish Affairs Committee
Friday 15th May 2026
Estimate memoranda - Annex to Memorandum - Memoranda tables - Scottish Government Main Estimates 2026-2027

Scottish Affairs Committee