Information between 31st January 2026 - 10th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jerome Mayhew speeches from: Lord Mandelson
Jerome Mayhew contributed 3 speeches (118 words) Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Jerome Mayhew speeches from: Railways Bill (Ninth sitting)
Jerome Mayhew contributed 26 speeches (6,084 words) Committee stage: 9th sitting Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport |
|
Jerome Mayhew speeches from: Railways Bill (Tenth sitting)
Jerome Mayhew contributed 38 speeches (8,820 words) Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport |
|
Jerome Mayhew speeches from: High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill
Jerome Mayhew contributed 2 speeches (877 words) Carry-over motion Monday 2nd February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
UK Emissions Trading Scheme: Shipping
Asked by: Jerome Mayhew (Conservative - Broadland and Fakenham) Tuesday 3rd February 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps he plans to take to prevent the UK ETS from operating as a pay-to-pollute scheme for maritime operators unable to access decarbonisation infrastructure. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Emissions Trading Scheme is a cap-and-trade system with a declining cap that ensures emissions from the traded sector, including the domestic maritime sector, fall in line with the United Kingdom’s statutory net zero commitments.
The scheme limits total emissions and enables reductions to occur where they are most cost effective, without prescribing specific technologies in any sector. For maritime operators, the scheme provides a clear price signal that supports investment in cleaner vessels, operational efficiency and emerging low carbon fuels.
The Government will continue to work with industry to support the development of infrastructure and technologies needed to facilitate decarbonisation. |
|
UK Emissions Trading Scheme: Shipping
Asked by: Jerome Mayhew (Conservative - Broadland and Fakenham) Tuesday 3rd February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether revenues generated by the inclusion of domestic maritime within the UK Emissions Trading Scheme will be ringfenced for maritime decarbonisation. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government is committed to maintaining an ambitious carbon pricing scheme to ensure that polluters continue to pay for their emissions. The UK Emissions Trading Scheme is our key lever to do so. This supports a cost-efficient transition toward net zero.
In July 2025, the UK Emissions Trading Scheme Authority confirmed an expansion to emissions from domestic maritime regime, commencing on 1 July 2026.
The UK does not hypothecate revenue from the UK ETS. All receipts from the UK ETS accrue to the consolidated fund, and go to funding government priorities, which includes decarbonisation support for the maritime sector. |
|
UK Emissions Trading Scheme: Shipping
Asked by: Jerome Mayhew (Conservative - Broadland and Fakenham) Thursday 5th February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of ringfencing UK ETS revenues generated from maritime emissions for investment in shore power, grid upgrades, vessel retrofits and alternative fuels. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government is committed to maintaining an ambitious carbon pricing scheme to ensure that polluters continue to pay for their emissions. The UK Emissions Trading Scheme is our key lever to do so. This supports a cost-efficient transition toward net zero.
In July 2025, the UK Emissions Trading Scheme Authority confirmed an expansion to emissions from domestic maritime regime, commencing on 1 July 2026.
The UK does not hypothecate revenue from the UK ETS. All receipts from the UK ETS accrue to the consolidated fund, and go to funding government priorities, which includes decarbonisation support for the maritime sector. |
|
Ferries: UK Emissions Trading Scheme
Asked by: Jerome Mayhew (Conservative - Broadland and Fakenham) Thursday 12th February 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the UK ETS on lifeline ferry services outside Scotland, including routes serving the Isle of Wight, the Isles of Scilly and Northern Ireland. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) An Impact Assessment was published alongside the main Authority Response in November 2025, which includes analysis of regional and distributional impacts. To mitigate risks of competitive impacts with routes between Great Britain and Ireland, we intend to introduce a 50% surrender deduction on voyages between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. All ferries serving the Isles of Scilly and most serving the Isle of Wight will not be in scope of the ETS under the planned rules. Potential or realised impacts on UK islands will be considered within our 2028 review and future decisions will be based on the evidence available at that time.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
2 Feb 2026, 7:02 p.m. - House of Commons "give way. I'm Jerome Mayhew. >> The Secretary of State and I am the first one to accept that there " Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MP, The Secretary of State for Transport (Swindon South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Feb 2026, 6:45 p.m. - House of Commons "Jerome Mayhew. " Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MP, The Secretary of State for Transport (Swindon South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Railways Bill (Ninth sitting)
105 speeches (15,301 words) Committee stage: 9th sitting Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Jerome Mayhew (Con - Broadland and Fakenham) —(Jerome Mayhew.) See explanatory statement for Amendment 46. - Link to Speech |
|
Railways Bill (Tenth sitting)
130 speeches (24,397 words) Tuesday 3rd February 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Edward Morello (LD - West Dorset) —(Jerome Mayhew.)This amendment would require the Secretary of State and Great British Railways to respond - Link to Speech 2: Jerome Mayhew (Con - Broadland and Fakenham) —(Jerome Mayhew.)This amendment would require the Passengers’ Council to set standards relating to the - Link to Speech |
|
High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill
26 speeches (6,925 words) Carry-over motion Monday 2nd February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Heidi Alexander (Lab - Swindon South) Member for Broadland and Fakenham (Jerome Mayhew), that this is a practical mechanism for taking forward - Link to Speech |