To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Performance Appraisal
Thursday 16th October 2014

Asked by: John Healey (Labour - Rawmarsh and Conisbrough)

Question to the Department for International Development:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many officials in her Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.

Answered by Desmond Swayne

Performance Rating

Number of employees who have declared a disability

Number of employees who work full time

Number of employees who works part-time/reduced hours

Exceeded

13

448

38

Met

49

1080

113

Must improve

6

132

11

Data provided on disability is based on those employees who have chosen to make a declaration of their diversity information on DFID’s HR system.


Written Question
Performance Appraisal
Thursday 16th October 2014

Asked by: John Healey (Labour - Rawmarsh and Conisbrough)

Question to the Department for International Development:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many officials in her Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.

Answered by Desmond Swayne

1822 officials in my Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14.

· 27% received an ‘Exceeded’ marking

· 65% received a ‘Met’ marking

· 8% received a ‘Must improve’ marking

1679 (92%) of officials qualified for an Individual Performance Award. This was paid at two rates depending on the level of performance. 143 (8%) did not qualify for an Individual Performance Award.


Written Question
Performance Appraisal
Thursday 16th October 2014

Asked by: John Healey (Labour - Rawmarsh and Conisbrough)

Question to the Department for International Development:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many officials in her Department of what (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.

Answered by Desmond Swayne

Performance Rating

Gender

Ethnicity

Age Bands

Male

Female

Black and Ethnic Minority (BME)

Non- BME

and

undeclared

34

and

under

35-44

45-54

55

and

over

Exceeded

225

261

37

449

185

167

117

17

Met

569

624

138

1055

318

388

354

133

Must improve

73

70

23

120

31

34

54

24

Totals

867

955

198

1624

534

589

525

174

Data provided on ethnicity is based on those employees who have chosen to make a declaration of their diversity information on DFID’s HR system.