Asked by: John Healey (Labour - Rawmarsh and Conisbrough)
Question to the Northern Ireland Office:
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how many officials in her Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
Answered by Theresa Villiers
The number of officials in my Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System that (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14 is set out below.
The response relates only to Home Civil Servants as Northern Ireland Civil Servants (NICS) seconded staff have a different performance management system, with different markings.
| Exceeded | Met/Must improve | Must improve |
Declared disability | None declared | * | * |
Full-time | 13 | 76** | ** |
Part-time | 1 | 5 | 0 |
* Given the small numbers of staff involved, fewer than five, it would not be appropriate to provide a greater break down as to do so would risk the identification of the individuals concerned.
** Figures for “Must improve” have been merged with “Met”; given the small numbers of staff involved it would not be appropriate to provide a greater break down as to do so would risk the identification of the individuals concerned.
Asked by: John Healey (Labour - Rawmarsh and Conisbrough)
Question to the Northern Ireland Office:
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how many officials in her Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
Answered by Theresa Villiers
All Home Civil Servants (HCS) in my Department completed the Performance Management system in 2013-14. Of these, 14 (14.7%) received the “exceeded” marking and qualified for a non-consolidated bonus.
The remaining 81 staff (85.3%) were ranked as “met” or “must improve”. No staff in these categories qualified for a bonus.
Given the small number of staff who were ranked as “must improve”, it would not be appropriate to provide any further breakdown as to do so would risk the identification of the individuals concerned
The response relates only to HCS staff as NICS seconded staff have a different performance management system with different markings and to which no pay awards are attached.
Asked by: John Healey (Labour - Rawmarsh and Conisbrough)
Question to the Northern Ireland Office:
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how many officials in her Department of what (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
Answered by Theresa Villiers
The number of officials in my Department of what (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14 are set out below.
Gender | Ethnicity | Age | |
Exceeded | Female 12 Male 2 | 10 Undeclared; 4 declared but given low numbers cannot provide further details. | 25-29 - 1 30-34 - 5 35-39 - 4 45-49 - 3 55-59 - 1 |
Met | Female 42 Male 39 | 49 undeclared; 30 white/English/British; 2 declared in other categories but given low numbers cannot provide further details.
| 20-24 - 2 25-29 - 6 30-34 - 8 35-39 - 5 40-44 - 11 45-49 - 21 50-54 - 11 55-59 - 11 60-64 - 5 65-70 - 1 |
Must improve | Female * Male * | * | * |
* Figures for “Must improve” have been merged with “Met”; given the small numbers of staff involved it would not be appropriate to provide a greater break down as to do so would risk the identification of the individuals concerned.