To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context
John McNally (SNP) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 36 Scottish National Party Aye votes vs 0 Scottish National Party No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 300
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Mar 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Reduction in Rates) (No.2) Bill - View Vote Context
John McNally (SNP) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 36 Scottish National Party No votes vs 0 Scottish National Party Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 43
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 12 Mar 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all John McNally (SNP - Falkirk) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 12 Mar 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all John McNally (SNP - Falkirk) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2024 - 6. Capital gains tax (reduction in higher rate for residential property gains to 24%) - View Vote Context
John McNally (SNP) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 38 Scottish National Party No votes vs 0 Scottish National Party Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 46
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
John McNally (SNP) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 37 Scottish National Party No votes vs 0 Scottish National Party Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 43
Written Question
Pension Protection Fund
Tuesday 12th March 2024

Asked by: John McNally (Scottish National Party - Falkirk)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to Q339 of the evidence given by the Minister for Pensions to the Work and Pensions Committee on 10 January 2024, HC144, whether the Minister has had recent discussions with representatives of the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) on indexation of pre-1997 contributions; and when he next plans to meet with PPF representatives.

Answered by Paul Maynard - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)

I meet regularly with the Pensions Protection Fund and have discussed pre-97 Pensions Protection Fund indexation with them. The most recent meeting was on 7th March 2024.


Division Vote (Commons)
6 Mar 2024 - Financial Statement and Budget Report - View Vote Context
John McNally (SNP) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 33 Scottish National Party No votes vs 0 Scottish National Party Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 38
Written Question
Biofuels: Carbon Capture and Storage
Monday 4th March 2024

Asked by: John McNally (Scottish National Party - Falkirk)

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of the use of woody biomass as feedstock for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage on (a) global land use and (b) the availability of land for growing crops.

Answered by Andrew Bowie - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

To ensure that bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) delivers genuine negative emissions, Government will require that only sustainable biomass is used. The 2023 Biomass Strategy included an assessment of sustainable biomass availability to the UK (including woody biomass), to support the UK’s net zero target. The availability of sustainable woody biomass was estimated using updated modelling which included considerations of global land use to exclude unsustainable changes, as well as accounting for wider land use pressures such as food security and biodiversity.


Written Question
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Monday 4th March 2024

Asked by: John McNally (Scottish National Party - Falkirk)

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if she will update her Department’s greenhouse gas removals business model to include (a) enhanced rock weathering and (b) other technologies that do not use carbon capture and storage.

Answered by Andrew Bowie - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Government recognises the potential role of greenhouse gas removal (GGR) technologies that do not require carbon capture and storage (CCS) in meeting net zero, including enhanced rock weathering, though specific technical and regulatory barriers must be addressed before any decisions can be made on their eligibility for the GGR business model. As set out in the Government response to the GGR business model consultation, published in June 2023, this includes the need for further evidence on permanence, reversibility, and environmental impacts associated with these methods.

The Government is working closely with academics, industry, and the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) GGR Demonstrator projects to investigate the feasibility of scaling non-CCS GGR technologies in future.