Juliet Campbell Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Juliet Campbell

Information between 14th October 2026 - 24th October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context
Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108


Speeches
Juliet Campbell speeches from: Community Policing: Government Support
Juliet Campbell contributed 1 speech (302 words)
Wednesday 21st October 2026 - Westminster Hall
Home Office


Written Answers
Social Services
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe)
Thursday 15th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether free at the point of use care under the proposed National Care Service will apply to (a) adults under the age of 65 with assessed care needs, and (b) whether the entitlement will cover accommodation and living costs, in addition to personal care.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, and others with direct, real-life experience of the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That will include individuals aged under 65 years old in need of care, and the individuals caring for them. The Government will wait for the outcome of Baroness Casey’s review before taking any final decisions.

Dyslexia
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment the Department has made of the potential impact of late or absent identification of dyslexia on the mental health and wellbeing of children and young people.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

Effective timely identification and intervention is critical in improving the outcomes of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities. We recognise that special educational needs do not always become apparent in the early years of education, and that needs can emerge, change or become more visible during adolescence as social, emotional and academic demands increase

The Code of Practice makes it clear that we expect teachers to monitor the progress of all pupils and put support in place where needed. Access to targeted educational support should not be dependent on a child or young person having a diagnosis. Instead, evidence-based support should be put in place at the earliest possible point following the identification of a need. This is to ensure that children and young people do not miss out on high-quality teaching and support, which limits progress, confidence, independence, and future life chances.

To support settings, we are strengthening the evidence base of what works to improve timely identification in mainstream settings. The department has appointed an independent expert panel to develop the National Inclusion Standards that set out evidence-informed tools, strategies and approaches for educators to draw on to identify and support children and young people with additional needs.

We are clear that education settings have an ongoing and important role to play in promoting and supporting the mental health and wellbeing of their pupils.

Young People: Neurodiversity
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to support local authorities to develop coordinated pathways into education, training and employment for neurodivergent young people.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The government is committed to ensuring neurodivergent young people and those with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) have clear, coordinated pathways into education, training and employment. Local authorities have statutory responsibilities to support participation and effective preparation for adulthood.

Through SEND reforms, the department is strengthening transitions between education and adult life, improving information sharing and supporting pathways including apprenticeships and Supported Internships. Youth Guarantee Trailblazers are testing approaches for young people at risk of becoming NEET.

The Post-16 Education and Skills White Paper complements this by strengthening local coordination across skills, employment, health and transport. Post-16 qualification reforms will provide clearer, inclusive routes into further study, apprenticeships and skilled employment, with providers able to tailor support to individual needs. We are also developing technical education routes from age 14, working with Strategic Authorities to create a consistent national framework that can respond to local labour market needs and growth priorities.



Early Day Motions Signed
Monday 2nd November
Juliet Campbell signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 2nd November 2026

Sir Patrick Stewart

8 signatures (Most recent: 3 Nov 2026)
Tabled by: Chris Webb (Labour - Blackpool South)
That this House expresses its profound sadness at the death of Sir Patrick Stewart, aged 86; pays tribute to his extraordinary career spanning more than six decades across theatre, television and film; recognises his immense contribution to British acting, from his distinguished performances with the Royal Shakespeare Company to his …



Juliet Campbell mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Community Policing: Government Support
63 speeches (9,502 words)
Wednesday 21st October 2026 - Westminster Hall
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Sarah Jones (Lab - Croydon West) Friend the Member for Broxtowe (Juliet Campbell), I say that I spoke to the deputy chief constable following - Link to Speech




Juliet Campbell - Select Committee Information

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 4th November 2026
Report - Works of Art Annual Report 2025-26

Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art