Roads: Speed Cameras Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Berkeley

Main Page: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer)

Roads: Speed Cameras

Lord Berkeley Excerpts
Tuesday 5th October 2010

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Asked by
Lord Berkeley Portrait Lord Berkeley
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the effect on road accidents of their decision to phase out central funding of fixed speed cameras.

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, no assessment has been made about the effect on road accidents that may result from the decision to discontinue the specific road safety capital grant. The Government continue to provide substantial funding for local transport, including for road safety. Fixed camera operation is an option for local authorities, which remain free to invest in new cameras using their own resources.

Lord Berkeley Portrait Lord Berkeley
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the Minister for that reply. He will be aware, I am sure, that there will be very few convictions for offences now that the cameras have been discontinued. Is he aware that the Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership assessed the speed of cars after these machines were switched off and found that 2.9 to four times more cars are exceeding the speed limit? Is that what the Government’s road safety policy is about? There have been many more accidents, deaths and serious injuries. Is that really what the Government intend?

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we certainly do not want people to exceed the speed limit and we will monitor the casualty rates both nationally and locally. Local authorities should consider the potential of the full range of road safety interventions, including educational and engineering solutions, and the Government will encourage them to do so.