South China Sea: Royal Navy Deployment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Collins of Highbury

Main Page: Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour - Life peer)

South China Sea: Royal Navy Deployment

Lord Collins of Highbury Excerpts
Thursday 1st November 2018

(5 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Why am I not surprised, my Lords? I realise that no navy in the world is big enough to satisfy the noble Lord’s insatiable appetite for frigates. It is still the Government’s intention to order eight Type 26 frigates but also, as I think the noble Lord knows, to order several of the new Type 31e frigates, which we believe will fulfil a multipurpose role. The Royal Navy is a very important part of our defence capability, and the Government are committed to doing everything they can to support the Navy in its endeavours.

Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the key issue is of course the protection of international shipping lines, which noble Lords have referred to. In fact, the last time my noble friend mentioned the value of trade, the Minister said it was worth $4 trillion, so I do not know what has happened.

Lord West of Spithead Portrait Lord West of Spithead
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is $4 trillion; I got it wrong.

Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury
- Hansard - -

So I have been able to correct my noble friend. When the noble Earl, Lord Howe, responded to this issue when it was last raised, he said that ultimately, our actions will be judged by our allies. Obviously, the balance that needs to be struck involves our trading partners throughout the Pacific Rim. What are we doing to ensure that concerted action takes place to defend international shipping rights?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The UK is playing a very significant role in that respect. I have outlined the Government’s attitude in relation to the South China Sea; that is a clear position. I emphasise that we do not take sides on the sovereignty issue but we are disturbed by reports of any militarisation, for example, of the South China Sea and any threat or implied threat of force. We oppose any action that changes the facts on the ground, raises tension and hinders the chances of peaceful settlement of these disputes.