South China Sea: Royal Navy Deployment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord West of Spithead

Main Page: Lord West of Spithead (Labour - Life peer)

South China Sea: Royal Navy Deployment

Lord West of Spithead Excerpts
Thursday 1st November 2018

(5 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord West of Spithead Portrait Lord West of Spithead (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the Minister will know that we are the largest European investor in south-east Asia and the Pacific Rim, and that $3 trillion-worth of trade passes through the South China Sea. It is absolutely crucial and we cannot let any nation stop freedom of navigation through there, or allow China to make that effectively an inland sea. However—today is the 104th anniversary of the Battle of Coronel, where in the Pacific, I fear, a British squadron was not just beaten but almost annihilated, with the loss of several thousand sailors. That brings home the fact that if you are to show presence out there, which is important for stability, there needs to be backup, and there need to be sufficient ships and capability to do it. Does the Minister not believe that we need to put some effort into getting some more ships?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Why am I not surprised, my Lords? I realise that no navy in the world is big enough to satisfy the noble Lord’s insatiable appetite for frigates. It is still the Government’s intention to order eight Type 26 frigates but also, as I think the noble Lord knows, to order several of the new Type 31e frigates, which we believe will fulfil a multipurpose role. The Royal Navy is a very important part of our defence capability, and the Government are committed to doing everything they can to support the Navy in its endeavours.

Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the key issue is of course the protection of international shipping lines, which noble Lords have referred to. In fact, the last time my noble friend mentioned the value of trade, the Minister said it was worth $4 trillion, so I do not know what has happened.

Lord West of Spithead Portrait Lord West of Spithead
- Hansard - -

It is $4 trillion; I got it wrong.

Lord Collins of Highbury Portrait Lord Collins of Highbury
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

So I have been able to correct my noble friend. When the noble Earl, Lord Howe, responded to this issue when it was last raised, he said that ultimately, our actions will be judged by our allies. Obviously, the balance that needs to be struck involves our trading partners throughout the Pacific Rim. What are we doing to ensure that concerted action takes place to defend international shipping rights?