Information between 19th February 2026 - 11th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No and in line with the House One of 3 Independent No votes vs 3 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 286 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye and in line with the House One of 6 Independent Aye votes vs 1 Independent No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No and in line with the House One of 3 Independent No votes vs 4 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No and in line with the House One of 3 Independent No votes vs 2 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 280 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No and in line with the House One of 3 Independent No votes vs 5 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272 |
|
24 Feb 2026 - Online Harm: Child Protection - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No and in line with the House One of 3 Independent No votes vs 2 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 279 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No and in line with the House One of 7 Independent No votes vs 1 Independent Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 10 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Markus Campbell-Savours voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177 |
| Early Day Motions |
|---|
|
Wednesday 25th February Flooded homes in Wigton (No. 2) 1 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour - Penrith and Solway) That this House notes that despite the continued anguish of the residents of Burnside, Wigton, CCL Secure have still not removed the six foot metal security fence that, during the heavy rain in November 2025, trapped debris and contributed to the flooding of homes; acknowledges the existence of drone footage … |
|
Wednesday 25th February Castlegate and Derwent Surgery in Cockermouth (No. 5) 2 signatures (Most recent: 10 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour - Penrith and Solway) That this House urges NHS England to work closely with the North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB) and consider all options for removing the GP contract from the Castlegate and Derwent GP partnership in order to protect patient safety; further urges the Department of Health and Social … |
|
Wednesday 25th February Castlegate and Derwent Surgery in Cockermouth (No. 4) 1 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour - Penrith and Solway) That this House notes the findings of CQC inspections in 2023, 2024 and 2025 which identified significant failures in safety, governance, responsiveness and leadership at Castlegate and Derwent GP Practice, including a warning notice issued in August 2024 for failures to establish effective systems to ensure safe patient care; further … |
|
Wednesday 25th February Castlegate and Derwent Surgery in Cockermouth (No. 3) 1 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour - Penrith and Solway) That this House notes with regret the serious deterioration of working relationships between partners at Castlegate and Derwent GP Practice; further notes that nearly all the GP partners have resigned, leaving only one partner planning to stay, with several others working out their notice periods; also notes evidence of financial … |
|
Wednesday 25th February Castlegate and Derwent Surgery in Cockermouth (No. 2) 1 signatures (Most recent: 25 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour - Penrith and Solway) That this House notes with concern the growing loss of public confidence in the Castlegate and Derwent GP Practice in Cockermouth, which serves over 18,500 patients; acknowledges long-standing issues detailed in successive Care Quality Commission inspections in 2023, 2024 and 2025, which gave an overall rating of "Requires Improvement", with … |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 19th January Markus Campbell-Savours signed this EDM on Wednesday 25th March 2026 Public health campaign on tackling stigma towards suicide 50 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) That this House highlights, on Blue Monday, that every life lost to suicide is a tragedy; recognises the importance of breaking down barriers surrounding the stigma towards the topic of suicide; understands the importance of opening up conversations on the issue; further acknowledges that many people do not feel comfortable … |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Lord Maude of Horsham Public Bodies - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Simon Hoare (Chair); Markus Campbell-Savours; Sam Carling; Lauren |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Daniel Greenberg CB, and Paula Sussex CBE Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Lauren Edwards (Chair); Markus Campbell-Savours; Sam Carling; Peter |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026
Oral Evidence - John Pullinger CB, and Ed Humpherson CB Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Lauren Edwards (Chair); Markus Campbell-Savours; Sam Carling; Peter |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 3rd March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Cabinet Office At 10:00am: Oral evidence Catherine Little CB - Chief Operating Officer for the Civil Service and Permanent Secretary to the Cabinet Office at Cabinet Office Caroline Patterson - Chief Financial Officer at Cabinet Office David Foley - Chief Executive at Infected Blood Compensation Authority Angela MacDonald - Second Permanent Secretary at HM Revenue and Customs Ellen Atkinson - Acting Director General of Propriety and Ethics at Cabinet Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Public Bodies At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Lord Maude of Horsham - Former Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office (2010-2015) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 5th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1) At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Andrew Williams - Head of Department, University of Warwick Rosanna Ellul - Policy and Parliamentary Manager, INQUEST View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman At 10:00am: Oral evidence Paula Sussex CBE - Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Rebecca Hilsenrath KC (Hon) - Chief Executive Officer at Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?
3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber? |