Information between 16th March 2024 - 5th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 250 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 251 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 251 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 249 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 255 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 252 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 255 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 250 |
18 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 253 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 305 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 305 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 306 |
19 Mar 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 301 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 265 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 39 Noes - 257 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 265 |
25 Mar 2024 - Investigatory Powers (Amendment)Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michael Fabricant voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 38 |
Speeches |
---|
Michael Fabricant speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Michael Fabricant contributed 2 speeches (118 words) Thursday 21st March 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
Written Answers |
---|
Inland Waterways: Planning
Asked by: Michael Fabricant (Conservative - Lichfield) Thursday 21st March 2024 Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities: To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, if he will introduce National Planning Policy Guidance to assist local government planning authorities to provide a consistent approach to (a) canal and (b) associated infrastructure restoration. Answered by Lee Rowley - Minister of State (Minister for Housing) The restoration of inland waterways are hugely important to so many communities around the country. Whilst we do not currently have plans to introduce further guidance, we will certainly keep the matter under review. |
Inland Waterways: World Heritage Sites
Asked by: Michael Fabricant (Conservative - Lichfield) Thursday 21st March 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department provides guidance to navigation authorities on attaining World Heritage Status for canal systems. Answered by Julia Lopez - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is responsible for nominating sites across the United Kingdom, the Overseas Territories, and the Crown Dependencies to UNESCO for World Heritage Status. The Department last updated the Tentative List of prospective World Heritage nominations in 2022/23. Following the conclusion of this exercise, guidance was published on GOV.UK, which sets out the process for sites seeking World Heritage Status and advises those interested to contact the heritage agency responsible for heritage in their part of the UK (or the relevant Government authority if overseas) in the first instance. |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 27 2024
Notices of Amendments as at 27 March 2024 Criminal Justice Bill 2023-24 Amendment Paper Found: Hannah Bardell Elliot Colburn John Nicolson Mr Ben Bradshaw Dehenna Davison Kate Osborne Michael |