To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Taxation: Electronic Government
Friday 14th November 2025

Asked by: Mike Wood (Conservative - Kingswinford and South Staffordshire)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the Answer of 8 July 2025 to Question HL8787 on Taxation: Electronic Government, for what reason the functionality of HMRC IT systems does not allow taxpayers to submit their Making Tax Digital reporting requirements for income tax through their online (a) personal and (b) business tax accounts.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

Making Tax Digital (MTD) for Income Tax requires users to use software to keep digital tax records, submit quarterly updates of income and expenditure and submit a tax return. HMRC’s Personal and Business Tax Accounts are not able to provide this level of functionality and ensuring that the software is digitally linked directly to a taxpayer account helps users avoid the errors that could occur when transposing figures manually.

The government is encouraging a thriving third-party software market to support the diverse range of business that will be using MTD. This will deliver flexible and tailored ways for users to manage their tax affairs, including integration with other business software and management tools as well as free and low-cost options.


Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 71 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 69 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 73 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Mike Wood (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135