Steel Industry Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Wales Office

Steel Industry

Nic Dakin Excerpts
Wednesday 28th October 2015

(8 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Stephen Crabb Portrait Stephen Crabb
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As we debate this crisis today, we rightly make the thousands of workers in the steel industry and their families, who have faced devastating news about their jobs, and the many more who are working with the cloud of uncertainty hanging over the industry at this time, the central and primary focus of our concerns. When an individual loses their job, the pressures it creates can be a tragedy for their family and themselves. When whole communities are affected by large-scale job losses, the impact can be devastating—I completely recognise that.

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I am pleased that the Secretary of State is now looking forward, because I, along with my colleagues on the other side of the House, have been talking about the needs of the steel industry in our community since being elected to Parliament in 2010. We need to look forward together and work together to build a better future. It just so happens that it is his Government who can make decisions now, not anybody else.

Stephen Crabb Portrait Stephen Crabb
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely take the hon. Gentleman’s points and I pay tribute to the work he does on behalf of his constituents.

--- Later in debate ---
None Portrait Several hon. Members rose—
- Hansard -

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - -

Minister!

Stephen Crabb Portrait Stephen Crabb
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

—and what more the Government can do to boost productivity and help steel manufacturers to cut production costs.

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - -

Minister!

Stephen Crabb Portrait Stephen Crabb
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The UK’s steel industry is part of the foundation of many of the nation’s great, world-beating supply chains—

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - -

Minister!

Natascha Engel Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Natascha Engel)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. The Secretary of State has indicated that he is not giving way. Shouting “Minister!” from a sedentary position is not going to help anyone.

Let me also say that Members who are included in a very long list of speakers and who make constant interventions will not be called. We shall not be able to fit everyone in as it is, but if the interventions are kept to a minimum, we may have a chance of getting a little way down the list.

--- Later in debate ---
Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I am bemused when I compare the Government’s amendment with the main motion, because I cannot see what they have to object to. The amendment leaves out the motion’s reference to the “national strategic importance” of the steel industry. I think it is nationally strategically important. The motion refers to having an industrial strategy. I think we should have an industrial strategy, and many Conservative Members have said so too. It refers to

“looking at temporary action on business rates”.

As my constituency neighbour, the hon. Member for Brigg and Goole (Andrew Percy), pointed out, discussions are ongoing with North Lincolnshire Council, BIS and Tata on that very issue. I really do not understand why the Government feel they need to amend this very effective motion seeking the five industrial asks, and I hope the Minister will explain why.

I want to give a voice to my constituents, to whom I pay the utmost tribute for the way in which they are handling themselves in these difficult circumstances following the announcements last week. Kevin Allen, who voted Conservative at the recent local and national elections, wrote to me to say:

“I’m a 4th generation steel worker and I’m in fear of my livelihood, if I lose my job then I’ve lost everything, I support two house holds in this town two families so not only have I lost everything so has the other party, that will be 5 people seeking government hand outs, I won’t be the only one in this position, for every steel job this town loses there will be a huge knock on effect with others”.

That is the heartfelt reality in my community.

I had an email from a homeowner in Bottesford who says,

“my husband and I have worked on the steelworks for 36 and 31 years respectively and we are passionate about our jobs and the industry that we are proud to be part of. It hasn’t been easy and we have faced many issues but have fought to survive over the years often working long unpaid hours. The severe situation that we now face feels very different to all others”.

She continues:

“From a strategic point of view we cannot afford to lose our steel industry, we will be totally at the mercy of other countries with little bargaining power.”

Alex Cunningham Portrait Alex Cunningham (Stockton North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

A couple of weeks ago I met community officials in Stockton who talked about Ravenscraig in central Scotland, saying that the community there has not yet recovered. That fear must be shared in my hon. Friend’s communities, as well as in others across Teesside.

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is why it is great to see steelworkers here lobbying Parliament today. It is great to see steelworkers and their families in Scunthorpe high street gathering signatures for petitions and people queuing up to sign them. This is crucial to our community.

It is clear what needs to be done. The five industrial asks that were considered at the steel summit are the five industrial asks that the Government now need to deliver on. They need to act before it is too late.

None Portrait Several hon. Members rose—
- Hansard -