Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Peter Bedford and David Lammy
Tuesday 16th December 2025

(1 day, 12 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ashley Fox Portrait Sir Ashley Fox (Bridgwater) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

23. What assessment he has made of the potential impact of the proposal to restrict the right to a jury trial for certain offences on the rule of law.

David Lammy Portrait The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Mr David Lammy)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Everyone has a right to a fair trial, and the essence of a fair trial is a timely trial. Only 3% of all criminal cases are heard by a judge and jury under the current regime. Jury trials will remain a cornerstone of the British justice system. Delayed justice is justice denied.

Peter Bedford Portrait Mr Bedford
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Justice Secretary may have complete faith in the independence of the judiciary; sadly, I do not. We have seen a plethora of cases, particularly involving freedom of speech, where the judiciary has arguably been influenced by political correctness and the virtue signalling of bodies such as the Sentencing Council. If his proposals are designed to reduce the backlog, why do they not include a sunset clause?

David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely reject what the hon. Gentleman said. It is an absolute essential foundation of our democracy that all of us in this House and in government respect the independence of the judiciary. I remind him that it is precisely because of the judiciary’s independence that it is not able to answer for itself. The Lord Chancellor has that responsibility, and I will do it robustly.